退行性颈椎病:手术时机。

IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Maria Rossella Fasinella, Alberto Benato, Donato Creatura, Alexis Morgado, Cédric Yves Barrey
{"title":"退行性颈椎病:手术时机。","authors":"Maria Rossella Fasinella, Alberto Benato, Donato Creatura, Alexis Morgado, Cédric Yves Barrey","doi":"10.1530/EOR-2025-0070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite the growing burden of degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM), consensus on the optimal timing of surgical intervention remains lacking, especially for patients with mild symptoms or asymptomatic cord compression or in the context of recent trauma. Different scores, such as the mJOA, Nurick scale and NDI are commonly used to classify disease severity, but guidelines for managing these patients do not provide a clear framework for intervention timing.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We conducted a narrative review of the literature on the optimal timing of surgical intervention for DCM, using PubMed to identify relevant studies. The search was focused on surgical and non-operative management, clinical and radiological assessments, biomarkers and emerging technologies. The selected papers were reviewed for relevance and quality, with guidance from a senior author.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The initial search identified 6,705 articles, which were narrowed down to 136 relevant studies after applying filters for study type and clinical focus. A final selection of 87 papers was categorized by topics and the findings were synthesized to highlight trends, challenges and knowledge gaps in surgical timing for DCM.</p><p><strong>Focus of the study: </strong>This review article examines strategies for determining the optimal timing for surgery in DCM. It explores how radiological signs, clinical indicators and other markers may help identify patients at risk of rapid neurological deterioration, particularly in the 'grey-zone' population (mild symptoms or asymptomatic disease), enabling clinicians to assess correctly different clinical scenarios and to indicate timely surgical intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":48598,"journal":{"name":"Efort Open Reviews","volume":"10 6","pages":"403-415"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12139713/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Degenerative cervical myelopathy: timing of surgery.\",\"authors\":\"Maria Rossella Fasinella, Alberto Benato, Donato Creatura, Alexis Morgado, Cédric Yves Barrey\",\"doi\":\"10.1530/EOR-2025-0070\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite the growing burden of degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM), consensus on the optimal timing of surgical intervention remains lacking, especially for patients with mild symptoms or asymptomatic cord compression or in the context of recent trauma. Different scores, such as the mJOA, Nurick scale and NDI are commonly used to classify disease severity, but guidelines for managing these patients do not provide a clear framework for intervention timing.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We conducted a narrative review of the literature on the optimal timing of surgical intervention for DCM, using PubMed to identify relevant studies. The search was focused on surgical and non-operative management, clinical and radiological assessments, biomarkers and emerging technologies. The selected papers were reviewed for relevance and quality, with guidance from a senior author.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The initial search identified 6,705 articles, which were narrowed down to 136 relevant studies after applying filters for study type and clinical focus. A final selection of 87 papers was categorized by topics and the findings were synthesized to highlight trends, challenges and knowledge gaps in surgical timing for DCM.</p><p><strong>Focus of the study: </strong>This review article examines strategies for determining the optimal timing for surgery in DCM. It explores how radiological signs, clinical indicators and other markers may help identify patients at risk of rapid neurological deterioration, particularly in the 'grey-zone' population (mild symptoms or asymptomatic disease), enabling clinicians to assess correctly different clinical scenarios and to indicate timely surgical intervention.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48598,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Efort Open Reviews\",\"volume\":\"10 6\",\"pages\":\"403-415\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12139713/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Efort Open Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1530/EOR-2025-0070\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Efort Open Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1530/EOR-2025-0070","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:尽管退行性颈椎病(DCM)的负担越来越重,但对于手术干预的最佳时机仍然缺乏共识,特别是对于症状轻微或无症状脊髓压迫或近期创伤的患者。不同的评分,如mJOA, Nurick量表和NDI通常用于对疾病严重程度进行分类,但管理这些患者的指南并没有提供一个明确的干预时间框架。材料和方法:我们对DCM手术干预最佳时机的文献进行了叙述性回顾,使用PubMed来识别相关研究。搜索的重点是外科和非手术管理,临床和放射学评估,生物标志物和新兴技术。在资深作者的指导下,对所选论文的相关性和质量进行了审查。结果:最初的检索确定了6705篇文章,在对研究类型和临床重点进行筛选后,将其缩小到136篇相关研究。最终选择的87篇论文按主题分类,并综合研究结果,以突出DCM手术时机的趋势,挑战和知识差距。研究重点:这篇综述文章探讨了确定DCM最佳手术时机的策略。它探讨了放射学体征、临床指标和其他标记如何有助于识别神经系统快速恶化风险的患者,特别是在“灰色地带”人群中(轻度症状或无症状疾病),使临床医生能够正确评估不同的临床情况并指示及时的手术干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Degenerative cervical myelopathy: timing of surgery.

Degenerative cervical myelopathy: timing of surgery.

Degenerative cervical myelopathy: timing of surgery.

Degenerative cervical myelopathy: timing of surgery.

Background: Despite the growing burden of degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM), consensus on the optimal timing of surgical intervention remains lacking, especially for patients with mild symptoms or asymptomatic cord compression or in the context of recent trauma. Different scores, such as the mJOA, Nurick scale and NDI are commonly used to classify disease severity, but guidelines for managing these patients do not provide a clear framework for intervention timing.

Materials and methods: We conducted a narrative review of the literature on the optimal timing of surgical intervention for DCM, using PubMed to identify relevant studies. The search was focused on surgical and non-operative management, clinical and radiological assessments, biomarkers and emerging technologies. The selected papers were reviewed for relevance and quality, with guidance from a senior author.

Results: The initial search identified 6,705 articles, which were narrowed down to 136 relevant studies after applying filters for study type and clinical focus. A final selection of 87 papers was categorized by topics and the findings were synthesized to highlight trends, challenges and knowledge gaps in surgical timing for DCM.

Focus of the study: This review article examines strategies for determining the optimal timing for surgery in DCM. It explores how radiological signs, clinical indicators and other markers may help identify patients at risk of rapid neurological deterioration, particularly in the 'grey-zone' population (mild symptoms or asymptomatic disease), enabling clinicians to assess correctly different clinical scenarios and to indicate timely surgical intervention.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Efort Open Reviews
Efort Open Reviews Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
2.90%
发文量
101
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: EFORT Open Reviews publishes high-quality instructional review articles across the whole field of orthopaedics and traumatology. Commissioned, peer-reviewed articles from international experts summarize current knowledge and practice in orthopaedics, with the aim of providing systematic coverage of the field. All articles undergo rigorous scientific editing to ensure the highest standards of accuracy and clarity. This continuously published online journal is fully open access and will provide integrated CME. It is an authoritative resource for educating trainees and supports practising orthopaedic surgeons in keeping informed about the latest clinical and scientific advances. One print issue containing a selection of papers from the journal will be published each year to coincide with the EFORT Annual Congress. EFORT Open Reviews is the official journal of the European Federation of National Associations of Orthopaedics and Traumatology (EFORT) and is published in partnership with The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信