Stefano Barlati, Viola Bulgari, Irene Calzavara-Pinton, Gabriele Nibbio, Lorenzo Bertoni, Daniela Zardini, Andrea Zucchetti, Antonio Baglioni, Stefano Paolini, Laura Poddighe, Anna Ceraso, Jacopo Lisoni, Giacomo Deste, Antonio Vita
{"title":"抑郁症临床管理中患者报告的结果:现状和未来方向。","authors":"Stefano Barlati, Viola Bulgari, Irene Calzavara-Pinton, Gabriele Nibbio, Lorenzo Bertoni, Daniela Zardini, Andrea Zucchetti, Antonio Baglioni, Stefano Paolini, Laura Poddighe, Anna Ceraso, Jacopo Lisoni, Giacomo Deste, Antonio Vita","doi":"10.1080/09638237.2025.2512305","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Insight into the assessment of patient-reported outcomes among adults with depression can help to understand their perception of their mental health and care experience.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To identify studies on the use of Patient-reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) and Patient-reported Experience Measures (PREMs) in the clinical care of depression.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A narrative review was conducted. PubMed and Scopus databases were searched for studies using patient-reported outcomes among people with depression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Several disease-specific and generic PROMs are available to assess the perceived symptoms severity and functioning. The use of PREMs is instead mostly limited to assessing satisfaction with care. There are also a series of psychometric and content limitations that hinder the reliability of such measures in the clinical management of depression.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is a variety of patient-reported outcomes of relevance among adults with depression. Despite the growing interest regarding such outcomes and their measures, several methodological issues should be considered. Moreover, significant aspects of functional recovery of relevance for people living with depression do not appear to be completely covered by currently available measures.</p>","PeriodicalId":48135,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mental Health","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient-reported outcomes in the clinical management of depression: current status and future directions.\",\"authors\":\"Stefano Barlati, Viola Bulgari, Irene Calzavara-Pinton, Gabriele Nibbio, Lorenzo Bertoni, Daniela Zardini, Andrea Zucchetti, Antonio Baglioni, Stefano Paolini, Laura Poddighe, Anna Ceraso, Jacopo Lisoni, Giacomo Deste, Antonio Vita\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09638237.2025.2512305\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Insight into the assessment of patient-reported outcomes among adults with depression can help to understand their perception of their mental health and care experience.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To identify studies on the use of Patient-reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) and Patient-reported Experience Measures (PREMs) in the clinical care of depression.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A narrative review was conducted. PubMed and Scopus databases were searched for studies using patient-reported outcomes among people with depression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Several disease-specific and generic PROMs are available to assess the perceived symptoms severity and functioning. The use of PREMs is instead mostly limited to assessing satisfaction with care. There are also a series of psychometric and content limitations that hinder the reliability of such measures in the clinical management of depression.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is a variety of patient-reported outcomes of relevance among adults with depression. Despite the growing interest regarding such outcomes and their measures, several methodological issues should be considered. Moreover, significant aspects of functional recovery of relevance for people living with depression do not appear to be completely covered by currently available measures.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48135,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Mental Health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-12\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Mental Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09638237.2025.2512305\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09638237.2025.2512305","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Patient-reported outcomes in the clinical management of depression: current status and future directions.
Background: Insight into the assessment of patient-reported outcomes among adults with depression can help to understand their perception of their mental health and care experience.
Aims: To identify studies on the use of Patient-reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) and Patient-reported Experience Measures (PREMs) in the clinical care of depression.
Methods: A narrative review was conducted. PubMed and Scopus databases were searched for studies using patient-reported outcomes among people with depression.
Results: Several disease-specific and generic PROMs are available to assess the perceived symptoms severity and functioning. The use of PREMs is instead mostly limited to assessing satisfaction with care. There are also a series of psychometric and content limitations that hinder the reliability of such measures in the clinical management of depression.
Conclusions: There is a variety of patient-reported outcomes of relevance among adults with depression. Despite the growing interest regarding such outcomes and their measures, several methodological issues should be considered. Moreover, significant aspects of functional recovery of relevance for people living with depression do not appear to be completely covered by currently available measures.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Mental Health is an international forum for the latest research in the mental health field. Reaching over 65 countries, the journal reports on the best in evidence-based practice around the world and provides a channel of communication between the many disciplines involved in mental health research and practice. The journal encourages multi-disciplinary research and welcomes contributions that have involved the users of mental health services. The international editorial team are committed to seeking out excellent work from a range of sources and theoretical perspectives. The journal not only reflects current good practice but also aims to influence policy by reporting on innovations that challenge traditional ways of working.