抑郁症临床管理中患者报告的结果:现状和未来方向。

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Stefano Barlati, Viola Bulgari, Irene Calzavara-Pinton, Gabriele Nibbio, Lorenzo Bertoni, Daniela Zardini, Andrea Zucchetti, Antonio Baglioni, Stefano Paolini, Laura Poddighe, Anna Ceraso, Jacopo Lisoni, Giacomo Deste, Antonio Vita
{"title":"抑郁症临床管理中患者报告的结果:现状和未来方向。","authors":"Stefano Barlati, Viola Bulgari, Irene Calzavara-Pinton, Gabriele Nibbio, Lorenzo Bertoni, Daniela Zardini, Andrea Zucchetti, Antonio Baglioni, Stefano Paolini, Laura Poddighe, Anna Ceraso, Jacopo Lisoni, Giacomo Deste, Antonio Vita","doi":"10.1080/09638237.2025.2512305","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Insight into the assessment of patient-reported outcomes among adults with depression can help to understand their perception of their mental health and care experience.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To identify studies on the use of Patient-reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) and Patient-reported Experience Measures (PREMs) in the clinical care of depression.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A narrative review was conducted. PubMed and Scopus databases were searched for studies using patient-reported outcomes among people with depression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Several disease-specific and generic PROMs are available to assess the perceived symptoms severity and functioning. The use of PREMs is instead mostly limited to assessing satisfaction with care. There are also a series of psychometric and content limitations that hinder the reliability of such measures in the clinical management of depression.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is a variety of patient-reported outcomes of relevance among adults with depression. Despite the growing interest regarding such outcomes and their measures, several methodological issues should be considered. Moreover, significant aspects of functional recovery of relevance for people living with depression do not appear to be completely covered by currently available measures.</p>","PeriodicalId":48135,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mental Health","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient-reported outcomes in the clinical management of depression: current status and future directions.\",\"authors\":\"Stefano Barlati, Viola Bulgari, Irene Calzavara-Pinton, Gabriele Nibbio, Lorenzo Bertoni, Daniela Zardini, Andrea Zucchetti, Antonio Baglioni, Stefano Paolini, Laura Poddighe, Anna Ceraso, Jacopo Lisoni, Giacomo Deste, Antonio Vita\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09638237.2025.2512305\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Insight into the assessment of patient-reported outcomes among adults with depression can help to understand their perception of their mental health and care experience.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To identify studies on the use of Patient-reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) and Patient-reported Experience Measures (PREMs) in the clinical care of depression.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A narrative review was conducted. PubMed and Scopus databases were searched for studies using patient-reported outcomes among people with depression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Several disease-specific and generic PROMs are available to assess the perceived symptoms severity and functioning. The use of PREMs is instead mostly limited to assessing satisfaction with care. There are also a series of psychometric and content limitations that hinder the reliability of such measures in the clinical management of depression.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is a variety of patient-reported outcomes of relevance among adults with depression. Despite the growing interest regarding such outcomes and their measures, several methodological issues should be considered. Moreover, significant aspects of functional recovery of relevance for people living with depression do not appear to be completely covered by currently available measures.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48135,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Mental Health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-12\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Mental Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09638237.2025.2512305\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09638237.2025.2512305","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:深入了解成人抑郁症患者报告结果的评估可以帮助了解他们对心理健康和护理经历的看法。目的:确定患者报告结果量表(PROMs)和患者报告体验量表(PREMs)在抑郁症临床护理中的应用研究。方法:采用叙述性回顾法。在PubMed和Scopus数据库中搜索了使用抑郁症患者报告结果的研究。结果:几种疾病特异性和通用PROMs可用于评估感知症状的严重程度和功能。相反,PREMs的使用主要局限于评估护理满意度。还有一系列的心理测量和内容的限制,阻碍了这些措施在抑郁症的临床管理的可靠性。结论:成人抑郁症患者报告的相关结局多种多样。尽管人们对这些结果及其措施越来越感兴趣,但仍应考虑几个方法问题。此外,目前可用的措施似乎并未完全涵盖抑郁症患者相关功能恢复的重要方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Patient-reported outcomes in the clinical management of depression: current status and future directions.

Background: Insight into the assessment of patient-reported outcomes among adults with depression can help to understand their perception of their mental health and care experience.

Aims: To identify studies on the use of Patient-reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) and Patient-reported Experience Measures (PREMs) in the clinical care of depression.

Methods: A narrative review was conducted. PubMed and Scopus databases were searched for studies using patient-reported outcomes among people with depression.

Results: Several disease-specific and generic PROMs are available to assess the perceived symptoms severity and functioning. The use of PREMs is instead mostly limited to assessing satisfaction with care. There are also a series of psychometric and content limitations that hinder the reliability of such measures in the clinical management of depression.

Conclusions: There is a variety of patient-reported outcomes of relevance among adults with depression. Despite the growing interest regarding such outcomes and their measures, several methodological issues should be considered. Moreover, significant aspects of functional recovery of relevance for people living with depression do not appear to be completely covered by currently available measures.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Mental Health
Journal of Mental Health PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
3.00%
发文量
117
期刊介绍: The Journal of Mental Health is an international forum for the latest research in the mental health field. Reaching over 65 countries, the journal reports on the best in evidence-based practice around the world and provides a channel of communication between the many disciplines involved in mental health research and practice. The journal encourages multi-disciplinary research and welcomes contributions that have involved the users of mental health services. The international editorial team are committed to seeking out excellent work from a range of sources and theoretical perspectives. The journal not only reflects current good practice but also aims to influence policy by reporting on innovations that challenge traditional ways of working.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信