Padageshwar Sunkara, Gary E Rosenthal, Chi-Cheng Huang, Gregory B Russell, Tareq S Islam, William C Lippert
{"title":"评估一个大型学术医疗中心的二级观察室对患者预后的影响,该中心同时存在I型观察室。","authors":"Padageshwar Sunkara, Gary E Rosenthal, Chi-Cheng Huang, Gregory B Russell, Tareq S Islam, William C Lippert","doi":"10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001836","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Observation units (OUs) are a common healthcare delivery model for health systems across the United States. OUs vary from a type I to type IV based on several factors. Another category of OUs-second-level OUs-does not fit this traditional classification due to a different patient population composition and staffing model. The impact of a second-level OU in the setting of a coexisting type I OU has not been previously evaluated. As such, our study assesses the impact of patient outcomes in a second-level OU with a coexisting type I OU.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We established a second-level OU comprising 14 beds on a medical-surgical floor. Patients designated as observation status who did not meet the criteria for the type I OU in the emergency department were cohorted on this unit and cared for by a multidisciplinary team that included nurses, case managers, pharmacists, and hospital medicine providers. We compared patient outcomes pre- and postsecond-level OU implementation for all observation status patients admitted to hospital medicine between January 1, 2019 and December 31, 2019.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients cohorted on the second-level OU had a shorter length of stay (estimated reduction in 11.7 hours; <i>P</i> < 0.0001) and a lower conversion rate from observation to inpatient status (\"admission rate\"; 14.5% vs 57.7%; <i>P</i> < 0.0001) in comparison to the nonintervention group; this led to a saving of 506.5 bed-days in comparison to the preimplementation phase.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Implementation of a second-level OU in the setting of a coexisting type I OU led to a reduced length of stay, admission rate, and bed-days saved.</p>","PeriodicalId":22043,"journal":{"name":"Southern Medical Journal","volume":"118 6","pages":"324-329"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating the Impact of a Second-Level Observation Unit on Patient Outcomes at a Large Academic Health Center with a Coexisting Type I Observation Unit.\",\"authors\":\"Padageshwar Sunkara, Gary E Rosenthal, Chi-Cheng Huang, Gregory B Russell, Tareq S Islam, William C Lippert\",\"doi\":\"10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001836\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Observation units (OUs) are a common healthcare delivery model for health systems across the United States. OUs vary from a type I to type IV based on several factors. Another category of OUs-second-level OUs-does not fit this traditional classification due to a different patient population composition and staffing model. The impact of a second-level OU in the setting of a coexisting type I OU has not been previously evaluated. As such, our study assesses the impact of patient outcomes in a second-level OU with a coexisting type I OU.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We established a second-level OU comprising 14 beds on a medical-surgical floor. Patients designated as observation status who did not meet the criteria for the type I OU in the emergency department were cohorted on this unit and cared for by a multidisciplinary team that included nurses, case managers, pharmacists, and hospital medicine providers. We compared patient outcomes pre- and postsecond-level OU implementation for all observation status patients admitted to hospital medicine between January 1, 2019 and December 31, 2019.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients cohorted on the second-level OU had a shorter length of stay (estimated reduction in 11.7 hours; <i>P</i> < 0.0001) and a lower conversion rate from observation to inpatient status (\\\"admission rate\\\"; 14.5% vs 57.7%; <i>P</i> < 0.0001) in comparison to the nonintervention group; this led to a saving of 506.5 bed-days in comparison to the preimplementation phase.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Implementation of a second-level OU in the setting of a coexisting type I OU led to a reduced length of stay, admission rate, and bed-days saved.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22043,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Southern Medical Journal\",\"volume\":\"118 6\",\"pages\":\"324-329\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Southern Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001836\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Southern Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001836","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:观察单位(ou)是美国卫生系统中常见的医疗服务模式。基于几个因素,ou从I型到IV型有所不同。由于不同的患者群体构成和人员配置模式,另一类u -二级u -不适合这种传统的分类。第二级OU对共存的第一类OU的影响以前没有被评估过。因此,我们的研究评估了并发I型OU的二级OU患者预后的影响。方法:我们在内科外科楼层建立了一个由14张床位组成的二级门诊。不符合急诊科I型OU标准的患者被指定为观察状态,并由包括护士、病例管理人员、药剂师和医院医务人员在内的多学科团队进行护理。我们比较了2019年1月1日至2019年12月31日住院的所有观察状态患者在实施二级OU之前和之后的患者结局。结果:在二级OU队列的患者住院时间较短(估计减少11.7小时;P < 0.0001),从观察到住院状态的转换率较低(“入院率”;14.5% vs 57.7%;P < 0.0001);与实施前阶段相比,这节省了506.5个床日。结论:在现有I型OU的情况下,实施二级OU可缩短住院时间、住院率和节省住院日。
Evaluating the Impact of a Second-Level Observation Unit on Patient Outcomes at a Large Academic Health Center with a Coexisting Type I Observation Unit.
Background: Observation units (OUs) are a common healthcare delivery model for health systems across the United States. OUs vary from a type I to type IV based on several factors. Another category of OUs-second-level OUs-does not fit this traditional classification due to a different patient population composition and staffing model. The impact of a second-level OU in the setting of a coexisting type I OU has not been previously evaluated. As such, our study assesses the impact of patient outcomes in a second-level OU with a coexisting type I OU.
Methods: We established a second-level OU comprising 14 beds on a medical-surgical floor. Patients designated as observation status who did not meet the criteria for the type I OU in the emergency department were cohorted on this unit and cared for by a multidisciplinary team that included nurses, case managers, pharmacists, and hospital medicine providers. We compared patient outcomes pre- and postsecond-level OU implementation for all observation status patients admitted to hospital medicine between January 1, 2019 and December 31, 2019.
Results: Patients cohorted on the second-level OU had a shorter length of stay (estimated reduction in 11.7 hours; P < 0.0001) and a lower conversion rate from observation to inpatient status ("admission rate"; 14.5% vs 57.7%; P < 0.0001) in comparison to the nonintervention group; this led to a saving of 506.5 bed-days in comparison to the preimplementation phase.
Conclusions: Implementation of a second-level OU in the setting of a coexisting type I OU led to a reduced length of stay, admission rate, and bed-days saved.
期刊介绍:
As the official journal of the Birmingham, Alabama-based Southern Medical Association (SMA), the Southern Medical Journal (SMJ) has for more than 100 years provided the latest clinical information in areas that affect patients'' daily lives. Now delivered to individuals exclusively online, the SMJ has a multidisciplinary focus that covers a broad range of topics relevant to physicians and other healthcare specialists in all relevant aspects of the profession, including medicine and medical specialties, surgery and surgery specialties; child and maternal health; mental health; emergency and disaster medicine; public health and environmental medicine; bioethics and medical education; and quality health care, patient safety, and best practices. Each month, articles span the spectrum of medical topics, providing timely, up-to-the-minute information for both primary care physicians and specialists. Contributors include leaders in the healthcare field from across the country and around the world. The SMJ enables physicians to provide the best possible care to patients in this age of rapidly changing modern medicine.