Claudia Iannone, Marco Di Battista, Maria Rosa Pellico, Ilaria Magi, Antonina Minniti, Giuseppe Armentaro, Silvia Cavalli, Manuel Sette, Laura Giudice, Cristina Bochicchio, Alessandra Della Rossa, Antonio G Tavoni, Fabio Cacciapaglia, Stefano Stano, Martina Orlandi, Dilia Giuggioli, Marta Mosca, Roberto Caporali, Nicoletta Del Papa
{"title":"selexipag对系统性硬化症相关数字溃疡的长期影响:一项病例对照多中心观察性研究。","authors":"Claudia Iannone, Marco Di Battista, Maria Rosa Pellico, Ilaria Magi, Antonina Minniti, Giuseppe Armentaro, Silvia Cavalli, Manuel Sette, Laura Giudice, Cristina Bochicchio, Alessandra Della Rossa, Antonio G Tavoni, Fabio Cacciapaglia, Stefano Stano, Martina Orlandi, Dilia Giuggioli, Marta Mosca, Roberto Caporali, Nicoletta Del Papa","doi":"10.1093/rheumatology/keaf292","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Digital ulcers (DUs) affect ∼50% of SSc patients, causing significant pain and functional impairment. Current management involves both systemic and local therapies. However, the burden in terms of pain and quality of life due to refractory DUs still remains heavy. While selexipag is approved for SSc-associated pulmonary arterial hypertension, its potential in treating DUs is unexplored. We aimed to evaluate the long-term efficacy of selexipag compared with iloprost in treating DUs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this multicentre case-control study, we retrospectively evaluated 96 SSc patients with refractory DUs (32 treated with selexipag, 64 with iloprost), matched for gender, disease subset and age. DU number, ischaemic pain and RP severity were assessed at baseline, 6, 12 and 24 months. Pain and RP were evaluated using the Likert Pain Scale (LPS) and Raynaud Condition Score (RCS), respectively. Additionally, DUs recurrence and new onset were recorded. Healing rates were estimated using Kaplan-Meier analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Selexipag showed higher efficacy with 87% of DUs healing rate vs 28% for iloprost at 96 weeks (P < 0.001). DUs number, RCS and LPS showed significant improvement in selexipag-treated patients compared with iloprost (P < 0.001 for all) throughout 24 months. Selexipag-treated patients achieved faster healing (75% by week 40) and maintained significantly lower relapse rates (5% vs 45% at 24 months, P < 0.001). New DUs formation remained consistently lower in the selexipag group compared with the iloprost group (5% vs 40% at 24 months, P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This observational study suggests that selexipag may be strongly effective in treating DUs refractory to conventional drugs.</p>","PeriodicalId":21255,"journal":{"name":"Rheumatology","volume":" ","pages":"5364-5371"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long-term effects of selexipag in SSc-associated digital ulcers: a case-control multicentre observational study.\",\"authors\":\"Claudia Iannone, Marco Di Battista, Maria Rosa Pellico, Ilaria Magi, Antonina Minniti, Giuseppe Armentaro, Silvia Cavalli, Manuel Sette, Laura Giudice, Cristina Bochicchio, Alessandra Della Rossa, Antonio G Tavoni, Fabio Cacciapaglia, Stefano Stano, Martina Orlandi, Dilia Giuggioli, Marta Mosca, Roberto Caporali, Nicoletta Del Papa\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/rheumatology/keaf292\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Digital ulcers (DUs) affect ∼50% of SSc patients, causing significant pain and functional impairment. Current management involves both systemic and local therapies. However, the burden in terms of pain and quality of life due to refractory DUs still remains heavy. While selexipag is approved for SSc-associated pulmonary arterial hypertension, its potential in treating DUs is unexplored. We aimed to evaluate the long-term efficacy of selexipag compared with iloprost in treating DUs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this multicentre case-control study, we retrospectively evaluated 96 SSc patients with refractory DUs (32 treated with selexipag, 64 with iloprost), matched for gender, disease subset and age. DU number, ischaemic pain and RP severity were assessed at baseline, 6, 12 and 24 months. Pain and RP were evaluated using the Likert Pain Scale (LPS) and Raynaud Condition Score (RCS), respectively. Additionally, DUs recurrence and new onset were recorded. Healing rates were estimated using Kaplan-Meier analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Selexipag showed higher efficacy with 87% of DUs healing rate vs 28% for iloprost at 96 weeks (P < 0.001). DUs number, RCS and LPS showed significant improvement in selexipag-treated patients compared with iloprost (P < 0.001 for all) throughout 24 months. Selexipag-treated patients achieved faster healing (75% by week 40) and maintained significantly lower relapse rates (5% vs 45% at 24 months, P < 0.001). New DUs formation remained consistently lower in the selexipag group compared with the iloprost group (5% vs 40% at 24 months, P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This observational study suggests that selexipag may be strongly effective in treating DUs refractory to conventional drugs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21255,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rheumatology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"5364-5371\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rheumatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keaf292\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keaf292","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:数字溃疡(DUs)影响约50%的系统性硬化症(SSc)患者,引起明显的疼痛和功能损害。目前的治疗包括全身和局部治疗。然而,难治性药物引起的疼痛和生活质量方面的负担仍然很重。虽然selexipag被批准用于ssc相关的肺动脉高压,但其治疗DUs的潜力尚未被探索。我们的目的是评价selexipag与iloprost治疗DUs的长期疗效。方法:在这项多中心病例对照研究中,我们回顾性评估了96例SSc难治性DUs患者(32例用selexipag治疗,64例用伊洛前列素治疗),性别、疾病亚群和年龄相匹配。分别在基线、6、12和24个月评估DU数、缺血性疼痛和雷诺现象(RP)严重程度。疼痛和RP分别采用Likert疼痛量表(LPS)和雷诺状态评分(RCS)进行评估。同时记录DUs复发及新发病例。使用Kaplan-Meier分析估计愈合率。结果:96周时,Selexipag的DUs治愈率为87%,而伊洛前列素的治愈率为28% (p< 0.001)。与伊洛前列素相比,selexipag治疗患者的DUs数、RCS和LPS在24个月内均有显著改善(p< 0.001)。selexipag治疗的患者获得了更快的愈合(到第40周时达到75%),并保持了显著较低的复发率(24个月时5% vs 45%, p< 0.001)。与伊洛前列素组相比,selexipag组的新DUs形成始终较低(24个月时5% vs 40%, p< 0.001)。结论:这项观察性研究表明,selexipag可能对治疗常规药物难治性DUs非常有效。
Long-term effects of selexipag in SSc-associated digital ulcers: a case-control multicentre observational study.
Objectives: Digital ulcers (DUs) affect ∼50% of SSc patients, causing significant pain and functional impairment. Current management involves both systemic and local therapies. However, the burden in terms of pain and quality of life due to refractory DUs still remains heavy. While selexipag is approved for SSc-associated pulmonary arterial hypertension, its potential in treating DUs is unexplored. We aimed to evaluate the long-term efficacy of selexipag compared with iloprost in treating DUs.
Methods: In this multicentre case-control study, we retrospectively evaluated 96 SSc patients with refractory DUs (32 treated with selexipag, 64 with iloprost), matched for gender, disease subset and age. DU number, ischaemic pain and RP severity were assessed at baseline, 6, 12 and 24 months. Pain and RP were evaluated using the Likert Pain Scale (LPS) and Raynaud Condition Score (RCS), respectively. Additionally, DUs recurrence and new onset were recorded. Healing rates were estimated using Kaplan-Meier analysis.
Results: Selexipag showed higher efficacy with 87% of DUs healing rate vs 28% for iloprost at 96 weeks (P < 0.001). DUs number, RCS and LPS showed significant improvement in selexipag-treated patients compared with iloprost (P < 0.001 for all) throughout 24 months. Selexipag-treated patients achieved faster healing (75% by week 40) and maintained significantly lower relapse rates (5% vs 45% at 24 months, P < 0.001). New DUs formation remained consistently lower in the selexipag group compared with the iloprost group (5% vs 40% at 24 months, P < 0.001).
Conclusions: This observational study suggests that selexipag may be strongly effective in treating DUs refractory to conventional drugs.
期刊介绍:
Rheumatology strives to support research and discovery by publishing the highest quality original scientific papers with a focus on basic, clinical and translational research. The journal’s subject areas cover a wide range of paediatric and adult rheumatological conditions from an international perspective. It is an official journal of the British Society for Rheumatology, published by Oxford University Press.
Rheumatology publishes original articles, reviews, editorials, guidelines, concise reports, meta-analyses, original case reports, clinical vignettes, letters and matters arising from published material. The journal takes pride in serving the global rheumatology community, with a focus on high societal impact in the form of podcasts, videos and extended social media presence, and utilizing metrics such as Altmetric. Keep up to date by following the journal on Twitter @RheumJnl.