人工智能大语言模型在膝骨关节炎个性化康复方案中的作用:一项观察性研究。

IF 5.7 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Ömer Alperen Gürses, Anıl Özüdoğru, Figen Tuncay, Caner Kararti
{"title":"人工智能大语言模型在膝骨关节炎个性化康复方案中的作用:一项观察性研究。","authors":"Ömer Alperen Gürses, Anıl Özüdoğru, Figen Tuncay, Caner Kararti","doi":"10.1007/s10916-025-02207-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Large language models (LLMs) can contribute to treatment options and outcomes by assisting physiotherapists for conditions like osteoarthritis.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>The objective of this early-stage cross-sectional study is to assess the alignment of large language models with physiotherapists in designing physiotherapy and rehabilitation programs for knee osteoarthritis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty patients diagnosed with knee osteoarthritis were assessed using standardized clinical criteria. For each patient, individualized rehabilitation programs were created by three physiotherapists and by ChatGPT-4o and Gemini Advanced using structured prompts. The presence or absence of 50 clinically relevant rehabilitation parameters was recorded for each program. Chi-square tests were used to evaluate agreement rates between the LLMs and the physiotherapist-generated Consensus programs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ChatGPT-4o achieved a 74% agreement rate with the physiotherapists' Consensus programs, while Gemini Advanced achieved 70%. Although both models showed high compatibility with general rehabilitation components, they demonstrated notable limitations in exercise specificity, including frequency, sets, and progression criteria. ChatGPT-4o performed as well as or better than Gemini in most phases, particularly in Phase 3, while Gemini showed lower consistency in balance and stabilization parameters.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ChatGPT-4o and Gemini Advanced demonstrate promising potential in generating personalized rehabilitation programs for knee osteoarthritis. While their outputs generally align with expert recommendations, notable gaps remain in clinical reasoning and the provision of detailed exercise parameters. These findings underscore the importance of ongoing model refinement and the necessity of expert supervision for safe and effective clinical integration.</p>","PeriodicalId":16338,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Systems","volume":"49 1","pages":"73"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12134017/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Role of Artificial Intelligence Large Language Models in Personalized Rehabilitation Programs for Knee Osteoarthritis: An Observational Study.\",\"authors\":\"Ömer Alperen Gürses, Anıl Özüdoğru, Figen Tuncay, Caner Kararti\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10916-025-02207-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Large language models (LLMs) can contribute to treatment options and outcomes by assisting physiotherapists for conditions like osteoarthritis.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>The objective of this early-stage cross-sectional study is to assess the alignment of large language models with physiotherapists in designing physiotherapy and rehabilitation programs for knee osteoarthritis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty patients diagnosed with knee osteoarthritis were assessed using standardized clinical criteria. For each patient, individualized rehabilitation programs were created by three physiotherapists and by ChatGPT-4o and Gemini Advanced using structured prompts. The presence or absence of 50 clinically relevant rehabilitation parameters was recorded for each program. Chi-square tests were used to evaluate agreement rates between the LLMs and the physiotherapist-generated Consensus programs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ChatGPT-4o achieved a 74% agreement rate with the physiotherapists' Consensus programs, while Gemini Advanced achieved 70%. Although both models showed high compatibility with general rehabilitation components, they demonstrated notable limitations in exercise specificity, including frequency, sets, and progression criteria. ChatGPT-4o performed as well as or better than Gemini in most phases, particularly in Phase 3, while Gemini showed lower consistency in balance and stabilization parameters.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ChatGPT-4o and Gemini Advanced demonstrate promising potential in generating personalized rehabilitation programs for knee osteoarthritis. While their outputs generally align with expert recommendations, notable gaps remain in clinical reasoning and the provision of detailed exercise parameters. These findings underscore the importance of ongoing model refinement and the necessity of expert supervision for safe and effective clinical integration.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16338,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Systems\",\"volume\":\"49 1\",\"pages\":\"73\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12134017/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-025-02207-x\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Systems","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-025-02207-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:大型语言模型(LLMs)可以通过帮助物理治疗师治疗骨关节炎等疾病来帮助治疗方案和结果。目的:这项早期横断面研究的目的是评估大型语言模型与物理治疗师在设计膝关节骨关节炎的物理治疗和康复方案时的一致性。方法:采用标准化临床标准对40例膝骨关节炎患者进行评估。对于每个病人,个性化的康复计划是由三位物理治疗师和chatgpt - 40和Gemini Advanced使用结构化提示创建的。记录每个项目50个临床相关康复参数的存在与否。卡方检验用于评估llm和物理治疗师产生的共识方案之间的一致性率。结果:chatgpt - 40与物理治疗师共识方案的一致性率达到74%,而Gemini Advanced达到70%。尽管这两种模型都显示出与一般康复成分的高度兼容性,但它们在运动特异性(包括频率、组数和进展标准)方面表现出明显的局限性。chatgpt - 40在大多数阶段的表现与Gemini相当或更好,特别是在第三阶段,而Gemini在平衡和稳定参数方面的一致性较低。结论:chatgpt - 40和Gemini Advanced在膝骨关节炎的个性化康复方案中显示出良好的潜力。虽然他们的产出总体上与专家建议一致,但在临床推理和提供详细的运动参数方面仍存在显著差距。这些发现强调了持续改进模型的重要性,以及专家监督安全有效的临床整合的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The Role of Artificial Intelligence Large Language Models in Personalized Rehabilitation Programs for Knee Osteoarthritis: An Observational Study.

The Role of Artificial Intelligence Large Language Models in Personalized Rehabilitation Programs for Knee Osteoarthritis: An Observational Study.

Background: Large language models (LLMs) can contribute to treatment options and outcomes by assisting physiotherapists for conditions like osteoarthritis.

Aims: The objective of this early-stage cross-sectional study is to assess the alignment of large language models with physiotherapists in designing physiotherapy and rehabilitation programs for knee osteoarthritis.

Methods: Forty patients diagnosed with knee osteoarthritis were assessed using standardized clinical criteria. For each patient, individualized rehabilitation programs were created by three physiotherapists and by ChatGPT-4o and Gemini Advanced using structured prompts. The presence or absence of 50 clinically relevant rehabilitation parameters was recorded for each program. Chi-square tests were used to evaluate agreement rates between the LLMs and the physiotherapist-generated Consensus programs.

Results: ChatGPT-4o achieved a 74% agreement rate with the physiotherapists' Consensus programs, while Gemini Advanced achieved 70%. Although both models showed high compatibility with general rehabilitation components, they demonstrated notable limitations in exercise specificity, including frequency, sets, and progression criteria. ChatGPT-4o performed as well as or better than Gemini in most phases, particularly in Phase 3, while Gemini showed lower consistency in balance and stabilization parameters.

Conclusions: ChatGPT-4o and Gemini Advanced demonstrate promising potential in generating personalized rehabilitation programs for knee osteoarthritis. While their outputs generally align with expert recommendations, notable gaps remain in clinical reasoning and the provision of detailed exercise parameters. These findings underscore the importance of ongoing model refinement and the necessity of expert supervision for safe and effective clinical integration.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Systems
Journal of Medical Systems 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
1.90%
发文量
83
审稿时长
4.8 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Medical Systems provides a forum for the presentation and discussion of the increasingly extensive applications of new systems techniques and methods in hospital clinic and physician''s office administration; pathology radiology and pharmaceutical delivery systems; medical records storage and retrieval; and ancillary patient-support systems. The journal publishes informative articles essays and studies across the entire scale of medical systems from large hospital programs to novel small-scale medical services. Education is an integral part of this amalgamation of sciences and selected articles are published in this area. Since existing medical systems are constantly being modified to fit particular circumstances and to solve specific problems the journal includes a special section devoted to status reports on current installations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信