DeepSeek-R1和chatgpt - 40在全国医师执业资格考试中的表现比较研究

IF 5.7 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Jin Wu, Zhiheng Wang, Yifan Qin
{"title":"DeepSeek-R1和chatgpt - 40在全国医师执业资格考试中的表现比较研究","authors":"Jin Wu, Zhiheng Wang, Yifan Qin","doi":"10.1007/s10916-025-02213-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Large Language Models (LLMs) have a significant impact on medical education due to their advanced natural language processing capabilities. ChatGPT-4o (Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer), a mainstream Western LLM, demonstrates powerful multimodal abilities. DeepSeek-R1, a newly released free and open-source LLM from China, demonstrates capabilities on par with ChatGPT-4o across various domains. This study aims to evaluate the performance of DeepSeek-R1 and ChatGPT-4o on the Chinese National Medical Licensing Examination (CNMLE) and explore the performance differences of LLMs from distinct linguistic environments in Chinese medical education. We evaluated both LLMs using 600 multiple-choice questions from the written part of 2024 CNMLE, covering four units. The questions were categorized into low- and high-difficulty groups according to difficulty. The primary outcome was the overall accuracy rate of each LLM. The secondary outcomes included accuracy within each of the four units and within the two difficulty-level groups. DeepSeek-R1 achieved a statistically significantly higher overall accuracy of 92.0% compared to ChatGPT-4o's 87.2% (P < 0.05). In the low-difficulty group, DeepSeek-R1 demonstrated an accuracy rate of 95.9%, which was significantly higher than ChatGPT-4o's 92.0% (P < 0.05). No statistically significant differences were observed between the models in any of the four units or in the high-difficulty group (P > 0.05). DeepSeek-R1 demonstrated a performance advantage on CNMLE.</p>","PeriodicalId":16338,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Systems","volume":"49 1","pages":"74"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance of DeepSeek-R1 and ChatGPT-4o on the Chinese National Medical Licensing Examination: A Comparative Study.\",\"authors\":\"Jin Wu, Zhiheng Wang, Yifan Qin\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10916-025-02213-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Large Language Models (LLMs) have a significant impact on medical education due to their advanced natural language processing capabilities. ChatGPT-4o (Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer), a mainstream Western LLM, demonstrates powerful multimodal abilities. DeepSeek-R1, a newly released free and open-source LLM from China, demonstrates capabilities on par with ChatGPT-4o across various domains. This study aims to evaluate the performance of DeepSeek-R1 and ChatGPT-4o on the Chinese National Medical Licensing Examination (CNMLE) and explore the performance differences of LLMs from distinct linguistic environments in Chinese medical education. We evaluated both LLMs using 600 multiple-choice questions from the written part of 2024 CNMLE, covering four units. The questions were categorized into low- and high-difficulty groups according to difficulty. The primary outcome was the overall accuracy rate of each LLM. The secondary outcomes included accuracy within each of the four units and within the two difficulty-level groups. DeepSeek-R1 achieved a statistically significantly higher overall accuracy of 92.0% compared to ChatGPT-4o's 87.2% (P < 0.05). In the low-difficulty group, DeepSeek-R1 demonstrated an accuracy rate of 95.9%, which was significantly higher than ChatGPT-4o's 92.0% (P < 0.05). No statistically significant differences were observed between the models in any of the four units or in the high-difficulty group (P > 0.05). DeepSeek-R1 demonstrated a performance advantage on CNMLE.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16338,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Systems\",\"volume\":\"49 1\",\"pages\":\"74\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-025-02213-z\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Systems","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-025-02213-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

大型语言模型(LLMs)由于其先进的自然语言处理能力而对医学教育产生了重大影响。chatgpt - 40(聊天生成预训练变压器)是西方主流法学硕士,展示了强大的多模式能力。DeepSeek-R1是中国最新发布的免费开源法学硕士,在各个领域展示了与chatgpt - 40相当的能力。本研究旨在评估DeepSeek-R1和chatgpt - 40在中国国家医师执业资格考试(CNMLE)中的表现,并探讨不同语言环境的法学硕士在中国医学教育中的表现差异。我们使用2024年CNMLE书面部分的600个选择题来评估这两个llm,涵盖四个单元。这些问题根据难度被分为低难度和高难度两组。主要结果是每个LLM的总体准确率。次要结果包括四个单位和两个困难级别组的准确性。与chatgpt - 40的87.2%相比,DeepSeek-R1的总体准确率达到了92.0%,具有统计学意义(P 0.05)。DeepSeek-R1在CNMLE上表现出了性能优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Performance of DeepSeek-R1 and ChatGPT-4o on the Chinese National Medical Licensing Examination: A Comparative Study.

Large Language Models (LLMs) have a significant impact on medical education due to their advanced natural language processing capabilities. ChatGPT-4o (Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer), a mainstream Western LLM, demonstrates powerful multimodal abilities. DeepSeek-R1, a newly released free and open-source LLM from China, demonstrates capabilities on par with ChatGPT-4o across various domains. This study aims to evaluate the performance of DeepSeek-R1 and ChatGPT-4o on the Chinese National Medical Licensing Examination (CNMLE) and explore the performance differences of LLMs from distinct linguistic environments in Chinese medical education. We evaluated both LLMs using 600 multiple-choice questions from the written part of 2024 CNMLE, covering four units. The questions were categorized into low- and high-difficulty groups according to difficulty. The primary outcome was the overall accuracy rate of each LLM. The secondary outcomes included accuracy within each of the four units and within the two difficulty-level groups. DeepSeek-R1 achieved a statistically significantly higher overall accuracy of 92.0% compared to ChatGPT-4o's 87.2% (P < 0.05). In the low-difficulty group, DeepSeek-R1 demonstrated an accuracy rate of 95.9%, which was significantly higher than ChatGPT-4o's 92.0% (P < 0.05). No statistically significant differences were observed between the models in any of the four units or in the high-difficulty group (P > 0.05). DeepSeek-R1 demonstrated a performance advantage on CNMLE.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Systems
Journal of Medical Systems 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
1.90%
发文量
83
审稿时长
4.8 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Medical Systems provides a forum for the presentation and discussion of the increasingly extensive applications of new systems techniques and methods in hospital clinic and physician''s office administration; pathology radiology and pharmaceutical delivery systems; medical records storage and retrieval; and ancillary patient-support systems. The journal publishes informative articles essays and studies across the entire scale of medical systems from large hospital programs to novel small-scale medical services. Education is an integral part of this amalgamation of sciences and selected articles are published in this area. Since existing medical systems are constantly being modified to fit particular circumstances and to solve specific problems the journal includes a special section devoted to status reports on current installations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信