{"title":"揭露炎症性肠病:一项探索自我揭露经验、障碍和促进因素的系统综述和综合研究。","authors":"Emma Harriman, Fergal W Jones, Alexa Duff","doi":"10.1007/s10880-025-10079-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Due to its invisible nature, individuals must make decisions around self-disclosing Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD). Existing reviews have explored stigma as a barrier to disclosing IBD; however, other factors potentially affecting disclosure decisions have not been recently reviewed. The current review sought to synthesise qualitative papers exploring the experiences of disclosure, and identify facilitators and barriers to disclosure, within IBD. A systematic search identified 34 journal articles, comprising 1,004 participants. Following critical appraisal, a thematic meta-synthesis was completed. (PROSPERO registration ID CRD42023481441). A total of six main themes relating to self-disclosure were identified: it's a stigmatised illness; a wish to conceal; difficulties discussing IBD; a need to disclose; balancing the need to disclose and the reluctance to disclose; and varied consequences to disclosure. Overall, the included studies were adequate quality; however, weaknesses in reflexivity were observed across a high proportion. This review highlights the complexity of disclosure decisions and describes how personal beliefs, social contexts, and previous experiences can influence these. Potential clinical implications, the impact for public health services, and the need for future research are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":15494,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Disclosing Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Synthesis Exploring the Experience of, and Barriers and Facilitators to, Self-Disclosure.\",\"authors\":\"Emma Harriman, Fergal W Jones, Alexa Duff\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10880-025-10079-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Due to its invisible nature, individuals must make decisions around self-disclosing Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD). Existing reviews have explored stigma as a barrier to disclosing IBD; however, other factors potentially affecting disclosure decisions have not been recently reviewed. The current review sought to synthesise qualitative papers exploring the experiences of disclosure, and identify facilitators and barriers to disclosure, within IBD. A systematic search identified 34 journal articles, comprising 1,004 participants. Following critical appraisal, a thematic meta-synthesis was completed. (PROSPERO registration ID CRD42023481441). A total of six main themes relating to self-disclosure were identified: it's a stigmatised illness; a wish to conceal; difficulties discussing IBD; a need to disclose; balancing the need to disclose and the reluctance to disclose; and varied consequences to disclosure. Overall, the included studies were adequate quality; however, weaknesses in reflexivity were observed across a high proportion. This review highlights the complexity of disclosure decisions and describes how personal beliefs, social contexts, and previous experiences can influence these. Potential clinical implications, the impact for public health services, and the need for future research are discussed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15494,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10880-025-10079-z\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10880-025-10079-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Disclosing Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Synthesis Exploring the Experience of, and Barriers and Facilitators to, Self-Disclosure.
Due to its invisible nature, individuals must make decisions around self-disclosing Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD). Existing reviews have explored stigma as a barrier to disclosing IBD; however, other factors potentially affecting disclosure decisions have not been recently reviewed. The current review sought to synthesise qualitative papers exploring the experiences of disclosure, and identify facilitators and barriers to disclosure, within IBD. A systematic search identified 34 journal articles, comprising 1,004 participants. Following critical appraisal, a thematic meta-synthesis was completed. (PROSPERO registration ID CRD42023481441). A total of six main themes relating to self-disclosure were identified: it's a stigmatised illness; a wish to conceal; difficulties discussing IBD; a need to disclose; balancing the need to disclose and the reluctance to disclose; and varied consequences to disclosure. Overall, the included studies were adequate quality; however, weaknesses in reflexivity were observed across a high proportion. This review highlights the complexity of disclosure decisions and describes how personal beliefs, social contexts, and previous experiences can influence these. Potential clinical implications, the impact for public health services, and the need for future research are discussed.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings is an international forum for the publication of peer-reviewed original papers related to all areas of the science and practice of psychologists in medical settings. Manuscripts are chosen that have a broad appeal across psychology as well as other health care disciplines, reflecting varying backgrounds, interests, and specializations. The journal publishes original research, treatment outcome trials, meta-analyses, literature reviews, conceptual papers, brief scientific reports, and scholarly case studies. Papers accepted address clinical matters in medical settings; integrated care; health disparities; education and training of the future psychology workforce; interdisciplinary collaboration, training, and professionalism; licensing, credentialing, and privileging in hospital practice; research and practice ethics; professional development of psychologists in academic health centers; professional practice matters in medical settings; and cultural, economic, political, regulatory, and systems factors in health care. In summary, the journal provides a forum for papers predicted to have significant theoretical or practical importance for the application of psychology in medical settings.