利用肥胖症患者的三维打印患者特异性模型加强新手环甲环切开术培训。

IF 5.7 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Jaeeun Song, Junhyeok Ock, Wook-Jong Kim, Yong-Seok Park, Namkug Kim, Sung-Hoon Kim
{"title":"利用肥胖症患者的三维打印患者特异性模型加强新手环甲环切开术培训。","authors":"Jaeeun Song, Junhyeok Ock, Wook-Jong Kim, Yong-Seok Park, Namkug Kim, Sung-Hoon Kim","doi":"10.1007/s10916-025-02209-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to enhance cricothyroidotomy training for novice practitioners using three-dimensional-printed patient-specific models based on computed tomography images of a patient with obesity, evaluate these models compared to conventional training phantoms, and suggest possible effective training methods. A prospective, randomised crossover study was conducted with 30 medical students with no prior cricothyroidotomy experience. Participants performed the procedure on a conventional and a patient-specific model. Performance was assessed using time, visual inspections, and a three-dimensional scanner to evaluate the accuracy of the cricothyroidotomy simulation. The correlation between total time and checklist times for procedural step skills was analysed. Furthermore, a post-study survey was conducted to evaluate participants' perceptions of the realism and utility of both simulators. Patient-specific simulators required a longer time (18.63 ± 6.96 s) to confirm tracheal position compared to conventional simulators (15.28 ± 6.96 s; p = 0.034). Conversely, conventional simulators required a longer time (44.86 ± 27.56 s) to intubate than patient-specific simulators (27.96 ± 9.73 s; p < 0.001). Patient-specific simulators exhibited a greater deviation from the intended puncture site (17.14 ± 8.03 mm) compared to conventional simulators (2.95 ± 1.25 mm; p < 0.001), despite high visual success rates for both models. Survey results showed significantly higher ratings for the patient-specific simulator in terms of fidelity, utility, and special features (p < 0.001). This study assessed both time and accuracy in evaluating and enhancing training and procedural outcomes, being the first to incorporate a three-dimensional scanner into assessing outcomes. The findings, along with positive participant feedback from the post-study survey, emphasise the need for specialised training programmes incorporating a three-dimensional-printed, patient-specific models that reflect challenging scenarios particularly involving patients with obesity.</p>","PeriodicalId":16338,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Systems","volume":"49 1","pages":"75"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhancing Cricothyroidotomy Training for Novices Using Three-Dimensional-Printed Patient-Specific Models of a Patient with Obesity.\",\"authors\":\"Jaeeun Song, Junhyeok Ock, Wook-Jong Kim, Yong-Seok Park, Namkug Kim, Sung-Hoon Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10916-025-02209-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study aimed to enhance cricothyroidotomy training for novice practitioners using three-dimensional-printed patient-specific models based on computed tomography images of a patient with obesity, evaluate these models compared to conventional training phantoms, and suggest possible effective training methods. A prospective, randomised crossover study was conducted with 30 medical students with no prior cricothyroidotomy experience. Participants performed the procedure on a conventional and a patient-specific model. Performance was assessed using time, visual inspections, and a three-dimensional scanner to evaluate the accuracy of the cricothyroidotomy simulation. The correlation between total time and checklist times for procedural step skills was analysed. Furthermore, a post-study survey was conducted to evaluate participants' perceptions of the realism and utility of both simulators. Patient-specific simulators required a longer time (18.63 ± 6.96 s) to confirm tracheal position compared to conventional simulators (15.28 ± 6.96 s; p = 0.034). Conversely, conventional simulators required a longer time (44.86 ± 27.56 s) to intubate than patient-specific simulators (27.96 ± 9.73 s; p < 0.001). Patient-specific simulators exhibited a greater deviation from the intended puncture site (17.14 ± 8.03 mm) compared to conventional simulators (2.95 ± 1.25 mm; p < 0.001), despite high visual success rates for both models. Survey results showed significantly higher ratings for the patient-specific simulator in terms of fidelity, utility, and special features (p < 0.001). This study assessed both time and accuracy in evaluating and enhancing training and procedural outcomes, being the first to incorporate a three-dimensional scanner into assessing outcomes. The findings, along with positive participant feedback from the post-study survey, emphasise the need for specialised training programmes incorporating a three-dimensional-printed, patient-specific models that reflect challenging scenarios particularly involving patients with obesity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16338,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Systems\",\"volume\":\"49 1\",\"pages\":\"75\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-025-02209-9\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Systems","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-025-02209-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在利用基于肥胖患者计算机断层扫描图像的三维打印患者特异性模型来加强新手环甲亢切开术培训,将这些模型与传统训练模型进行比较,并提出可能有效的训练方法。一项前瞻性、随机交叉研究对30名没有环甲环切开术经验的医学生进行了研究。参与者在常规模型和患者特定模型上进行了手术。使用时间、目视检查和三维扫描仪评估环甲状软骨切开术模拟的准确性。分析程序步骤技能总时间与检查表次数的相关性。此外,还进行了一项研究后调查,以评估参与者对这两种模拟器的真实感和实用性的看法。患者专用模拟器确认气管位置所需时间(18.63±6.96秒)较常规模拟器(15.28±6.96秒)更长;p = 0.034)。相反,常规模拟器插管时间(44.86±27.56 s)比患者专用模拟器插管时间(27.96±9.73 s)长;p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Enhancing Cricothyroidotomy Training for Novices Using Three-Dimensional-Printed Patient-Specific Models of a Patient with Obesity.

This study aimed to enhance cricothyroidotomy training for novice practitioners using three-dimensional-printed patient-specific models based on computed tomography images of a patient with obesity, evaluate these models compared to conventional training phantoms, and suggest possible effective training methods. A prospective, randomised crossover study was conducted with 30 medical students with no prior cricothyroidotomy experience. Participants performed the procedure on a conventional and a patient-specific model. Performance was assessed using time, visual inspections, and a three-dimensional scanner to evaluate the accuracy of the cricothyroidotomy simulation. The correlation between total time and checklist times for procedural step skills was analysed. Furthermore, a post-study survey was conducted to evaluate participants' perceptions of the realism and utility of both simulators. Patient-specific simulators required a longer time (18.63 ± 6.96 s) to confirm tracheal position compared to conventional simulators (15.28 ± 6.96 s; p = 0.034). Conversely, conventional simulators required a longer time (44.86 ± 27.56 s) to intubate than patient-specific simulators (27.96 ± 9.73 s; p < 0.001). Patient-specific simulators exhibited a greater deviation from the intended puncture site (17.14 ± 8.03 mm) compared to conventional simulators (2.95 ± 1.25 mm; p < 0.001), despite high visual success rates for both models. Survey results showed significantly higher ratings for the patient-specific simulator in terms of fidelity, utility, and special features (p < 0.001). This study assessed both time and accuracy in evaluating and enhancing training and procedural outcomes, being the first to incorporate a three-dimensional scanner into assessing outcomes. The findings, along with positive participant feedback from the post-study survey, emphasise the need for specialised training programmes incorporating a three-dimensional-printed, patient-specific models that reflect challenging scenarios particularly involving patients with obesity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Systems
Journal of Medical Systems 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
1.90%
发文量
83
审稿时长
4.8 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Medical Systems provides a forum for the presentation and discussion of the increasingly extensive applications of new systems techniques and methods in hospital clinic and physician''s office administration; pathology radiology and pharmaceutical delivery systems; medical records storage and retrieval; and ancillary patient-support systems. The journal publishes informative articles essays and studies across the entire scale of medical systems from large hospital programs to novel small-scale medical services. Education is an integral part of this amalgamation of sciences and selected articles are published in this area. Since existing medical systems are constantly being modified to fit particular circumstances and to solve specific problems the journal includes a special section devoted to status reports on current installations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信