非心内膜射频消融治疗早室性复合体(NERA-PVC):安全性、有效性和结果。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Pasquale Valerio Falzone, Sara Vazquez-Calvo, Jean Baptiste Guichard, Till Althoff, Paz Garre, Jose Maria Tolosana, Eduard Guasch, Roger Borras, Lluis Mont, Andreu Porta-Sanchez, Ivo Roca-Luque
{"title":"非心内膜射频消融治疗早室性复合体(NERA-PVC):安全性、有效性和结果。","authors":"Pasquale Valerio Falzone, Sara Vazquez-Calvo, Jean Baptiste Guichard, Till Althoff, Paz Garre, Jose Maria Tolosana, Eduard Guasch, Roger Borras, Lluis Mont, Andreu Porta-Sanchez, Ivo Roca-Luque","doi":"10.1111/jce.16716","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Radiofrequency (RF) ablation of premature ventricular complexes (PVCs) is a well-established treatment for patients high PVCs burden, even when arising from epicardial/intramural localization. Consistent data about safety of using high power RF is lacking in the literature in these regions.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of this study is to investigate the safety of different RF power settings, efficacy and outcome of non-endocardial PVCs ablation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Consecutive patients who underwent PVC ablation were included (2017-2023). We defined \"Non-Endocardial Radiofrequency Ablation\"(NERA) a procedure in which at least one ablation site has been identified into the CVS, aortic cusps, inter-leaflet region or pulmonary cusps.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Total number of NERA sites was 64 in 56 procedures. In 63% of the procedures, high power (≥ 40 W) and in 60% long duration (≥ 60 s) RF was delivered in at least one site (median power: 40 W(30-40), median duration of single RF 54 s(45-91). In 21% of the procedures, a combination of both high power and long duration RF applications was performed. Overall procedural success was achieved in 46 procedures 82%), complete in 39 (70%), partial in 7 (12%). Only one severe complication (pericardial bleeding) was observed. Multisite ablation was associated with procedural failure. During follow-up, median PVC burden was 0.5%(0.5-9.5), with a median reduction of 97%. Multisite ablation and coronary venous system RF were predictors of recurrence (HR 3.6; p = 0.03) and HR 3.85; p = 0.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Ablation from non-endocardial sites is a safe and effective procedure, even using high power and/or long duration RF with clear benefit in terms of PVC burden reduction.</p>","PeriodicalId":15178,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Non-Endocardial Radiofrequency Ablation of Premature Ventricular Complexes (NERA-PVC): Safety, Efficacy and Outcome.\",\"authors\":\"Pasquale Valerio Falzone, Sara Vazquez-Calvo, Jean Baptiste Guichard, Till Althoff, Paz Garre, Jose Maria Tolosana, Eduard Guasch, Roger Borras, Lluis Mont, Andreu Porta-Sanchez, Ivo Roca-Luque\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jce.16716\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Radiofrequency (RF) ablation of premature ventricular complexes (PVCs) is a well-established treatment for patients high PVCs burden, even when arising from epicardial/intramural localization. Consistent data about safety of using high power RF is lacking in the literature in these regions.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of this study is to investigate the safety of different RF power settings, efficacy and outcome of non-endocardial PVCs ablation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Consecutive patients who underwent PVC ablation were included (2017-2023). We defined \\\"Non-Endocardial Radiofrequency Ablation\\\"(NERA) a procedure in which at least one ablation site has been identified into the CVS, aortic cusps, inter-leaflet region or pulmonary cusps.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Total number of NERA sites was 64 in 56 procedures. In 63% of the procedures, high power (≥ 40 W) and in 60% long duration (≥ 60 s) RF was delivered in at least one site (median power: 40 W(30-40), median duration of single RF 54 s(45-91). In 21% of the procedures, a combination of both high power and long duration RF applications was performed. Overall procedural success was achieved in 46 procedures 82%), complete in 39 (70%), partial in 7 (12%). Only one severe complication (pericardial bleeding) was observed. Multisite ablation was associated with procedural failure. During follow-up, median PVC burden was 0.5%(0.5-9.5), with a median reduction of 97%. Multisite ablation and coronary venous system RF were predictors of recurrence (HR 3.6; p = 0.03) and HR 3.85; p = 0.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Ablation from non-endocardial sites is a safe and effective procedure, even using high power and/or long duration RF with clear benefit in terms of PVC burden reduction.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15178,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jce.16716\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jce.16716","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:射频(RF)消融早室复合物(室性早搏)是一种公认的治疗高室性早搏负担的方法,即使是由心外膜/壁内定位引起的。在这些地区的文献中缺乏关于使用高功率射频安全性的一致数据。目的:本研究的目的是探讨不同射频功率设置对非心内膜室性早搏消融的安全性、疗效和结果。方法:纳入连续接受PVC消融的患者(2017-2023)。我们将“非心内膜射频消融”(NERA)定义为至少一个消融部位已被确定为CVS、主动脉尖、叶间区或肺尖的手术。结果:56例手术中NERA部位共64个。在63%的手术中,高功率(≥40 W)和60%的长时间(≥60 s)射频至少在一个部位(中位功率:40 W(30-40),单次射频中位持续时间54 s(45-91))。在21%的程序中,进行了高功率和长时间射频应用的组合。全部手术成功46例(82%),完全39例(70%),部分7例(12%)。只观察到一例严重并发症(心包出血)。多部位消融与手术失败相关。随访期间,中位PVC负荷为0.5%(0.5-9.5),中位减少97%。多部位消融和冠状静脉系统射频是复发的预测因素(HR 3.6;p = 0.03), HR为3.85;p = 0.02)。结论:非心内膜部位消融是一种安全有效的方法,即使使用高功率和/或长时间射频消融,在减少PVC负担方面也有明显的好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Non-Endocardial Radiofrequency Ablation of Premature Ventricular Complexes (NERA-PVC): Safety, Efficacy and Outcome.

Background: Radiofrequency (RF) ablation of premature ventricular complexes (PVCs) is a well-established treatment for patients high PVCs burden, even when arising from epicardial/intramural localization. Consistent data about safety of using high power RF is lacking in the literature in these regions.

Aim: The aim of this study is to investigate the safety of different RF power settings, efficacy and outcome of non-endocardial PVCs ablation.

Methods: Consecutive patients who underwent PVC ablation were included (2017-2023). We defined "Non-Endocardial Radiofrequency Ablation"(NERA) a procedure in which at least one ablation site has been identified into the CVS, aortic cusps, inter-leaflet region or pulmonary cusps.

Results: Total number of NERA sites was 64 in 56 procedures. In 63% of the procedures, high power (≥ 40 W) and in 60% long duration (≥ 60 s) RF was delivered in at least one site (median power: 40 W(30-40), median duration of single RF 54 s(45-91). In 21% of the procedures, a combination of both high power and long duration RF applications was performed. Overall procedural success was achieved in 46 procedures 82%), complete in 39 (70%), partial in 7 (12%). Only one severe complication (pericardial bleeding) was observed. Multisite ablation was associated with procedural failure. During follow-up, median PVC burden was 0.5%(0.5-9.5), with a median reduction of 97%. Multisite ablation and coronary venous system RF were predictors of recurrence (HR 3.6; p = 0.03) and HR 3.85; p = 0.02).

Conclusion: Ablation from non-endocardial sites is a safe and effective procedure, even using high power and/or long duration RF with clear benefit in terms of PVC burden reduction.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
14.80%
发文量
433
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology (JCE) keeps its readership well informed of the latest developments in the study and management of arrhythmic disorders. Edited by Bradley P. Knight, M.D., and a distinguished international editorial board, JCE is the leading journal devoted to the study of the electrophysiology of the heart.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信