对Lynch综合征患者风险分层结肠镜检查中粪便免疫化学检测(FIT)的用户体验、认知和态度的评估

IF 3.3 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Anne Lincoln, Jo Waller, Sally Benton, Peter Sasieni, Kevin J Monahan
{"title":"对Lynch综合征患者风险分层结肠镜检查中粪便免疫化学检测(FIT)的用户体验、认知和态度的评估","authors":"Anne Lincoln, Jo Waller, Sally Benton, Peter Sasieni, Kevin J Monahan","doi":"10.1136/bmjgast-2025-001751","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study evaluates the experiences, perceptions, and attitudes of people with Lynch syndrome (LS) towards faecal immunochemical testing (FIT) as an adjunct to colonoscopy for colorectal cancer surveillance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A mixed-methods design included two cohorts: an emergency clinical service during the COVID-19 pandemic and a longitudinal research initiative. Paper-based surveys assessed user experiences and attitudes using Likert scales and open-ended questions. Quantitative data were analysed for response patterns, while thematic analysis explored qualitative feedback.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 85% of participants who rated FIT positively, 90% were confident in using the test correctly. Women reported higher anxiety (7.8%) compared with men (2.0%, p=0.045). Thematic analysis revealed gratitude for FIT's convenience during healthcare disruptions but emphasised concerns about its accuracy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>FIT is widely perceived as an acceptable supplemental tool among surveyed people with LS, who appreciate its potential to reduce intervals between colonoscopies without compromising surveillance quality. Ongoing patient engagement is crucial to addressing concerns about FIT's reliability. Future research should evaluate long-term outcomes and explore diverse population perspectives to guide FIT implementation in LS surveillance.</p>","PeriodicalId":9235,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Gastroenterology","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12090851/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of user experiences, perceptions and attitudes towards faecal immunochemical testing (FIT) for risk-stratified colonoscopy in people with Lynch syndrome.\",\"authors\":\"Anne Lincoln, Jo Waller, Sally Benton, Peter Sasieni, Kevin J Monahan\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjgast-2025-001751\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study evaluates the experiences, perceptions, and attitudes of people with Lynch syndrome (LS) towards faecal immunochemical testing (FIT) as an adjunct to colonoscopy for colorectal cancer surveillance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A mixed-methods design included two cohorts: an emergency clinical service during the COVID-19 pandemic and a longitudinal research initiative. Paper-based surveys assessed user experiences and attitudes using Likert scales and open-ended questions. Quantitative data were analysed for response patterns, while thematic analysis explored qualitative feedback.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 85% of participants who rated FIT positively, 90% were confident in using the test correctly. Women reported higher anxiety (7.8%) compared with men (2.0%, p=0.045). Thematic analysis revealed gratitude for FIT's convenience during healthcare disruptions but emphasised concerns about its accuracy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>FIT is widely perceived as an acceptable supplemental tool among surveyed people with LS, who appreciate its potential to reduce intervals between colonoscopies without compromising surveillance quality. Ongoing patient engagement is crucial to addressing concerns about FIT's reliability. Future research should evaluate long-term outcomes and explore diverse population perspectives to guide FIT implementation in LS surveillance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9235,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Open Gastroenterology\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12090851/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Open Gastroenterology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgast-2025-001751\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgast-2025-001751","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究评估Lynch综合征(LS)患者对粪便免疫化学检测(FIT)作为结肠镜检查的辅助手段进行结直肠癌监测的经验、看法和态度。方法:混合方法设计包括两个队列:COVID-19大流行期间的紧急临床服务和纵向研究计划。基于纸张的调查使用李克特量表和开放式问题评估用户体验和态度。定量数据被用于分析反应模式,而专题分析则探讨定性反馈。结果:85%的参与者对FIT有正面评价,90%的参与者对正确使用测试有信心。女性的焦虑程度(7.8%)高于男性(2.0%,p=0.045)。专题分析显示,人们对FIT在医疗中断期间的便利表示感谢,但强调了对其准确性的担忧。结论:在接受调查的LS患者中,FIT被广泛认为是一种可接受的补充工具,他们欣赏其在不影响监测质量的情况下缩短结肠镜检查间隔的潜力。持续的患者参与是解决FIT可靠性问题的关键。未来的研究应评估长期结果,并探索不同人群的观点,以指导FIT在LS监测中的实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of user experiences, perceptions and attitudes towards faecal immunochemical testing (FIT) for risk-stratified colonoscopy in people with Lynch syndrome.

Objective: This study evaluates the experiences, perceptions, and attitudes of people with Lynch syndrome (LS) towards faecal immunochemical testing (FIT) as an adjunct to colonoscopy for colorectal cancer surveillance.

Methods: A mixed-methods design included two cohorts: an emergency clinical service during the COVID-19 pandemic and a longitudinal research initiative. Paper-based surveys assessed user experiences and attitudes using Likert scales and open-ended questions. Quantitative data were analysed for response patterns, while thematic analysis explored qualitative feedback.

Results: Among 85% of participants who rated FIT positively, 90% were confident in using the test correctly. Women reported higher anxiety (7.8%) compared with men (2.0%, p=0.045). Thematic analysis revealed gratitude for FIT's convenience during healthcare disruptions but emphasised concerns about its accuracy.

Conclusions: FIT is widely perceived as an acceptable supplemental tool among surveyed people with LS, who appreciate its potential to reduce intervals between colonoscopies without compromising surveillance quality. Ongoing patient engagement is crucial to addressing concerns about FIT's reliability. Future research should evaluate long-term outcomes and explore diverse population perspectives to guide FIT implementation in LS surveillance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Open Gastroenterology
BMJ Open Gastroenterology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.20%
发文量
68
审稿时长
2 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Open Gastroenterology is an online-only, peer-reviewed, open access gastroenterology journal, dedicated to publishing high-quality medical research from all disciplines and therapeutic areas of gastroenterology. It is the open access companion journal of Gut and is co-owned by the British Society of Gastroenterology. The journal publishes all research study types, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialist studies. Publishing procedures are built around continuous publication, publishing research online as soon as the article is ready.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信