基于四种成像方式的多模态放射组学模型预测乳腺癌新辅助治疗的病理完全缓解。

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Yuwen Liang, Haonan Xu, Jie Lin, Wenqiang Tang, Xinlan Liu, Kunyuan Gan, Qiaodi Wan, Xiaobo Du
{"title":"基于四种成像方式的多模态放射组学模型预测乳腺癌新辅助治疗的病理完全缓解。","authors":"Yuwen Liang, Haonan Xu, Jie Lin, Wenqiang Tang, Xinlan Liu, Kunyuan Gan, Qiaodi Wan, Xiaobo Du","doi":"10.1186/s12885-025-14407-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The radiomics model based on single imaging modality has been demonstrated as a promising approach for predicting the response to neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) in breast cancer. However, whether integrating multiple imaging modalities improve the performance of the radiomics model is undetermined. This study aims to develop a multi-modal radiomics model based on four imaging modalities, including ultrasound (US), mammography (MM), computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), for predicting pathological complete response (pCR) in breast cancer after NAT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who underwent surgery after NAT from January 2019 to July 2023 were retrospectively studied. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify independent clinical risk factors for pCR. The radiomic features were extracted from the volume of interest on the four imaging modalities. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator was used for developing radiomic signatures. The multi-modal radiomics model was developed by combining four radiomic signatures. The combined model was developed by combining clinical risk factors and four radiomic signatures. A nomogram was developed to visualize the combined model. Model performance was internally validated by using the five-fold cross-validation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 89 patients were included, with the pCR rate of 31.5% (28/89). Multivariate analyses identified PR status (OR = 4.450, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.228-18.063, P = 0.028), HER2 status (OR = 9.95, 95% CI, 1.525-201.894, P = 0.044) and clinical T stage (OR = 0.253, 95% CI, 0.076-0.753, P = 0.016) were independent clinical risk factors for pCR. The AUCs and brier scores of the radiomic signatures of US, MM, CT, and MRI were 0.702 (95% CI: 0.583-0.821), 0.762 (95% CI: 0.660-0.865), 0.814 (95% CI: 0.725-0.903), 0.787 (95% CI: 0.685-0.889) and 0.198, 0.177, 0.165, 0.170 respectively. The performance of the multi-modal radiomics model was superior to all radiomic signatures with an AUC of 0.904 (95% CI: 0.838-0.970) and with the brier score of 0.111. After adding independent clinical risk factors, the performance of the combined model further improved, achieving an AUC of 0.943 (95% CI: 0.893-0.992) and a brier score of 0.082. The nomogram showed potential clinical value.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The multi-modal radiomics model based on US, MM, CT, and MRI could accurately predict pCR in breast cancer after NAT, which was superior to all radiomic signatures. Incorporating clinical risk factors may further improve the performance of the muti-modal radiomics model, which could provide valuable information for guiding treatment decisions.</p>","PeriodicalId":9131,"journal":{"name":"BMC Cancer","volume":"25 1","pages":"985"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12128365/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multi-modal radiomics model based on four imaging modalities for predicting pathological complete response to neoadjuvant treatment in breast cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Yuwen Liang, Haonan Xu, Jie Lin, Wenqiang Tang, Xinlan Liu, Kunyuan Gan, Qiaodi Wan, Xiaobo Du\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12885-025-14407-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The radiomics model based on single imaging modality has been demonstrated as a promising approach for predicting the response to neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) in breast cancer. However, whether integrating multiple imaging modalities improve the performance of the radiomics model is undetermined. This study aims to develop a multi-modal radiomics model based on four imaging modalities, including ultrasound (US), mammography (MM), computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), for predicting pathological complete response (pCR) in breast cancer after NAT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who underwent surgery after NAT from January 2019 to July 2023 were retrospectively studied. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify independent clinical risk factors for pCR. The radiomic features were extracted from the volume of interest on the four imaging modalities. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator was used for developing radiomic signatures. The multi-modal radiomics model was developed by combining four radiomic signatures. The combined model was developed by combining clinical risk factors and four radiomic signatures. A nomogram was developed to visualize the combined model. Model performance was internally validated by using the five-fold cross-validation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 89 patients were included, with the pCR rate of 31.5% (28/89). Multivariate analyses identified PR status (OR = 4.450, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.228-18.063, P = 0.028), HER2 status (OR = 9.95, 95% CI, 1.525-201.894, P = 0.044) and clinical T stage (OR = 0.253, 95% CI, 0.076-0.753, P = 0.016) were independent clinical risk factors for pCR. The AUCs and brier scores of the radiomic signatures of US, MM, CT, and MRI were 0.702 (95% CI: 0.583-0.821), 0.762 (95% CI: 0.660-0.865), 0.814 (95% CI: 0.725-0.903), 0.787 (95% CI: 0.685-0.889) and 0.198, 0.177, 0.165, 0.170 respectively. The performance of the multi-modal radiomics model was superior to all radiomic signatures with an AUC of 0.904 (95% CI: 0.838-0.970) and with the brier score of 0.111. After adding independent clinical risk factors, the performance of the combined model further improved, achieving an AUC of 0.943 (95% CI: 0.893-0.992) and a brier score of 0.082. The nomogram showed potential clinical value.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The multi-modal radiomics model based on US, MM, CT, and MRI could accurately predict pCR in breast cancer after NAT, which was superior to all radiomic signatures. Incorporating clinical risk factors may further improve the performance of the muti-modal radiomics model, which could provide valuable information for guiding treatment decisions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9131,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Cancer\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"985\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12128365/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-025-14407-2\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-025-14407-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:基于单一成像模式的放射组学模型已被证明是预测乳腺癌新辅助治疗(NAT)反应的一种有前途的方法。然而,整合多种成像模式是否能提高放射组学模型的性能尚不确定。本研究旨在建立一种基于超声(US)、乳房x线摄影(MM)、计算机断层扫描(CT)和磁共振成像(MRI)等四种成像方式的多模式放射组学模型,用于预测乳腺癌NAT后病理完全缓解(pCR)。方法:回顾性研究2019年1月至2023年7月在NAT后接受手术的患者。进行单因素和多因素分析,以确定pCR的独立临床危险因素。在四种成像方式上从感兴趣的体积中提取放射学特征。最小绝对收缩和选择算子用于开发放射性特征。多模态放射组学模型是通过结合四个放射组学特征建立的。结合临床危险因素和四种放射学特征建立联合模型。开发了一个图来可视化组合模型。模型性能通过使用五重交叉验证进行内部验证。结果:共纳入89例患者,pCR率为31.5%(28/89)。多因素分析发现PR状态(OR = 4.450, 95%可信区间[CI], 1.228 ~ 18.063, P = 0.028)、HER2状态(OR = 9.95, 95% CI, 1.525 ~ 201.894, P = 0.044)和临床T分期(OR = 0.253, 95% CI, 0.076 ~ 0.753, P = 0.016)是pCR的独立临床危险因素。US、MM、CT和MRI放射学特征的auc和brier评分分别为0.702 (95% CI: 0.583-0.821)、0.762 (95% CI: 0.660-0.865)、0.814 (95% CI: 0.725-0.903)、0.787 (95% CI: 0.685-0.889)和0.198、0.177、0.165、0.170。多模态放射组学模型的表现优于所有放射组学特征,AUC为0.904 (95% CI: 0.838 ~ 0.970), brier评分为0.111。加入独立临床危险因素后,联合模型的性能进一步提高,AUC为0.943 (95% CI: 0.893-0.992), brier评分为0.082。图显示了潜在的临床价值。结论:基于US、MM、CT和MRI的多模态放射组学模型能够准确预测NAT后乳腺癌的pCR,优于所有放射组学特征。纳入临床危险因素可以进一步提高多模态放射组学模型的性能,为指导治疗决策提供有价值的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Multi-modal radiomics model based on four imaging modalities for predicting pathological complete response to neoadjuvant treatment in breast cancer.

Objective: The radiomics model based on single imaging modality has been demonstrated as a promising approach for predicting the response to neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) in breast cancer. However, whether integrating multiple imaging modalities improve the performance of the radiomics model is undetermined. This study aims to develop a multi-modal radiomics model based on four imaging modalities, including ultrasound (US), mammography (MM), computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), for predicting pathological complete response (pCR) in breast cancer after NAT.

Methods: Patients who underwent surgery after NAT from January 2019 to July 2023 were retrospectively studied. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify independent clinical risk factors for pCR. The radiomic features were extracted from the volume of interest on the four imaging modalities. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator was used for developing radiomic signatures. The multi-modal radiomics model was developed by combining four radiomic signatures. The combined model was developed by combining clinical risk factors and four radiomic signatures. A nomogram was developed to visualize the combined model. Model performance was internally validated by using the five-fold cross-validation.

Results: In total, 89 patients were included, with the pCR rate of 31.5% (28/89). Multivariate analyses identified PR status (OR = 4.450, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.228-18.063, P = 0.028), HER2 status (OR = 9.95, 95% CI, 1.525-201.894, P = 0.044) and clinical T stage (OR = 0.253, 95% CI, 0.076-0.753, P = 0.016) were independent clinical risk factors for pCR. The AUCs and brier scores of the radiomic signatures of US, MM, CT, and MRI were 0.702 (95% CI: 0.583-0.821), 0.762 (95% CI: 0.660-0.865), 0.814 (95% CI: 0.725-0.903), 0.787 (95% CI: 0.685-0.889) and 0.198, 0.177, 0.165, 0.170 respectively. The performance of the multi-modal radiomics model was superior to all radiomic signatures with an AUC of 0.904 (95% CI: 0.838-0.970) and with the brier score of 0.111. After adding independent clinical risk factors, the performance of the combined model further improved, achieving an AUC of 0.943 (95% CI: 0.893-0.992) and a brier score of 0.082. The nomogram showed potential clinical value.

Conclusion: The multi-modal radiomics model based on US, MM, CT, and MRI could accurately predict pCR in breast cancer after NAT, which was superior to all radiomic signatures. Incorporating clinical risk factors may further improve the performance of the muti-modal radiomics model, which could provide valuable information for guiding treatment decisions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Cancer
BMC Cancer 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
2.60%
发文量
1204
审稿时长
6.8 months
期刊介绍: BMC Cancer is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of cancer research, including the pathophysiology, prevention, diagnosis and treatment of cancers. The journal welcomes submissions concerning molecular and cellular biology, genetics, epidemiology, and clinical trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信