行肾切除术的非转移性肾癌患者的血小板-中性粒细胞-单核细胞-淋巴细胞比值的预后价值。

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Dan Chen, Yaxiong Tang, Bin Zhang
{"title":"行肾切除术的非转移性肾癌患者的血小板-中性粒细胞-单核细胞-淋巴细胞比值的预后价值。","authors":"Dan Chen, Yaxiong Tang, Bin Zhang","doi":"10.1186/s12885-025-14418-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Various systemic inflammation indices have emerged as prognostic markers for renal cell carcinoma (RCC); however, these indices have not been comprehensively integrated. In this study, we propose a novel systemic inflammation indice, the platelet-neutrophil-monocyte-lymphocyte ratio (PNMLR), aimed at more accurately assessing survival outcomes of patients with non-metastatic RCC.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective analysis of non-metastatic RCC patients who underwent nephrectomy between 2009 and 2013. Restricted cubic splines (RCS) were used to observe the relationship between PNMLR and disease-free survival (DFS) as well as overall survival (OS). Receiver operating characteristic curve and the Maximally Selected Log-Rank Statistic were employed to determine the optimal cutoff value of PNMLR. Patients were then divided into two groups based on the determined cutoff values and propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to balance baseline characteristics. After that, Kaplan-Meier curves and cox regression models were utilized to evaluate DFS and OS. Finally, the concordance index (c-index) of PLNMR (before PSM) in predicting DFS and OS was calculated and compared with other systemic inflammation indices.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1163 patients were included. RCS showed a significant association between PNMLR and DFS as well as OS (both p < 0.001). The optimized PNMLR cutoff was 168. Patients with higher PNMLR exhibited larger tumor size (OR = 1.16, p = 0.028), higher Fuhrman grade (HR = 1.59, p = 0.001), and advanced pT stage (HR = 1.88, p = 0.003). After PSM, elevated PNMLR was associated with poorer DFS (HR = 1.56, p = 0.011) and OS (HR = 1.75, p = 0.004). The c-index of PNMLR for DFS and OS were 0.643 (95%CI, 0.596-0.689) and 0.669 (95%CI, 0.611-0.708) respectively, suggesting competitive predictive performance compared to other systemic inflammation indices.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PNMLR is a promising prognostic marker for non-metastatic RCC. However, its moderate discriminative ability suggests that PNMLR should be used in conjunction with other established clinical parameters. Further validation, particularly in independent, contemporary external cohorts, is essential to fully harness its clinical utility.</p>","PeriodicalId":9131,"journal":{"name":"BMC Cancer","volume":"25 1","pages":"988"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12131521/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prognostic value of the platelet-neutrophil-monocyte-lymphocyte ratio in patients with non-metastatic renal cell carcinoma who underwent nephrectomy.\",\"authors\":\"Dan Chen, Yaxiong Tang, Bin Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12885-025-14418-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Various systemic inflammation indices have emerged as prognostic markers for renal cell carcinoma (RCC); however, these indices have not been comprehensively integrated. In this study, we propose a novel systemic inflammation indice, the platelet-neutrophil-monocyte-lymphocyte ratio (PNMLR), aimed at more accurately assessing survival outcomes of patients with non-metastatic RCC.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective analysis of non-metastatic RCC patients who underwent nephrectomy between 2009 and 2013. Restricted cubic splines (RCS) were used to observe the relationship between PNMLR and disease-free survival (DFS) as well as overall survival (OS). Receiver operating characteristic curve and the Maximally Selected Log-Rank Statistic were employed to determine the optimal cutoff value of PNMLR. Patients were then divided into two groups based on the determined cutoff values and propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to balance baseline characteristics. After that, Kaplan-Meier curves and cox regression models were utilized to evaluate DFS and OS. Finally, the concordance index (c-index) of PLNMR (before PSM) in predicting DFS and OS was calculated and compared with other systemic inflammation indices.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1163 patients were included. RCS showed a significant association between PNMLR and DFS as well as OS (both p < 0.001). The optimized PNMLR cutoff was 168. Patients with higher PNMLR exhibited larger tumor size (OR = 1.16, p = 0.028), higher Fuhrman grade (HR = 1.59, p = 0.001), and advanced pT stage (HR = 1.88, p = 0.003). After PSM, elevated PNMLR was associated with poorer DFS (HR = 1.56, p = 0.011) and OS (HR = 1.75, p = 0.004). The c-index of PNMLR for DFS and OS were 0.643 (95%CI, 0.596-0.689) and 0.669 (95%CI, 0.611-0.708) respectively, suggesting competitive predictive performance compared to other systemic inflammation indices.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PNMLR is a promising prognostic marker for non-metastatic RCC. However, its moderate discriminative ability suggests that PNMLR should be used in conjunction with other established clinical parameters. Further validation, particularly in independent, contemporary external cohorts, is essential to fully harness its clinical utility.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9131,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Cancer\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"988\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12131521/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-025-14418-z\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-025-14418-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:各种全身性炎症指标已成为肾细胞癌(RCC)的预后指标;然而,这些指标尚未得到全面整合。在这项研究中,我们提出了一种新的全身炎症指标,血小板-中性粒细胞-单核细胞-淋巴细胞比率(PNMLR),旨在更准确地评估非转移性RCC患者的生存结果。患者和方法:我们对2009年至2013年间接受肾切除术的非转移性肾细胞癌患者进行了回顾性分析。采用限制性三次样条(Restricted cubic splines, RCS)观察PNMLR与无病生存期(disease-free survival, DFS)和总生存期(overall survival, OS)的关系。采用受试者工作特征曲线和最大选择Log-Rank统计量确定PNMLR的最佳截止值。然后根据确定的截止值将患者分为两组,并进行倾向评分匹配(PSM)以平衡基线特征。然后采用Kaplan-Meier曲线和cox回归模型评价DFS和OS。最后计算PLNMR (PSM前)预测DFS和OS的一致性指数(c-index),并与其他全身性炎症指标进行比较。结果:共纳入1163例患者。结论:PNMLR是一种很有希望的非转移性RCC预后标志物。然而,其中度判别能力表明PNMLR应与其他已建立的临床参数结合使用。进一步的验证,特别是在独立的当代外部队列中,对于充分利用其临床效用至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prognostic value of the platelet-neutrophil-monocyte-lymphocyte ratio in patients with non-metastatic renal cell carcinoma who underwent nephrectomy.

Background: Various systemic inflammation indices have emerged as prognostic markers for renal cell carcinoma (RCC); however, these indices have not been comprehensively integrated. In this study, we propose a novel systemic inflammation indice, the platelet-neutrophil-monocyte-lymphocyte ratio (PNMLR), aimed at more accurately assessing survival outcomes of patients with non-metastatic RCC.

Patients and methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of non-metastatic RCC patients who underwent nephrectomy between 2009 and 2013. Restricted cubic splines (RCS) were used to observe the relationship between PNMLR and disease-free survival (DFS) as well as overall survival (OS). Receiver operating characteristic curve and the Maximally Selected Log-Rank Statistic were employed to determine the optimal cutoff value of PNMLR. Patients were then divided into two groups based on the determined cutoff values and propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to balance baseline characteristics. After that, Kaplan-Meier curves and cox regression models were utilized to evaluate DFS and OS. Finally, the concordance index (c-index) of PLNMR (before PSM) in predicting DFS and OS was calculated and compared with other systemic inflammation indices.

Results: A total of 1163 patients were included. RCS showed a significant association between PNMLR and DFS as well as OS (both p < 0.001). The optimized PNMLR cutoff was 168. Patients with higher PNMLR exhibited larger tumor size (OR = 1.16, p = 0.028), higher Fuhrman grade (HR = 1.59, p = 0.001), and advanced pT stage (HR = 1.88, p = 0.003). After PSM, elevated PNMLR was associated with poorer DFS (HR = 1.56, p = 0.011) and OS (HR = 1.75, p = 0.004). The c-index of PNMLR for DFS and OS were 0.643 (95%CI, 0.596-0.689) and 0.669 (95%CI, 0.611-0.708) respectively, suggesting competitive predictive performance compared to other systemic inflammation indices.

Conclusions: PNMLR is a promising prognostic marker for non-metastatic RCC. However, its moderate discriminative ability suggests that PNMLR should be used in conjunction with other established clinical parameters. Further validation, particularly in independent, contemporary external cohorts, is essential to fully harness its clinical utility.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Cancer
BMC Cancer 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
2.60%
发文量
1204
审稿时长
6.8 months
期刊介绍: BMC Cancer is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of cancer research, including the pathophysiology, prevention, diagnosis and treatment of cancers. The journal welcomes submissions concerning molecular and cellular biology, genetics, epidemiology, and clinical trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信