治疗方案对住院成人急性免疫性血小板减少症的影响。

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Justin Presutto, Abby Rose Broomfield, Sierra Parsons, Morgan LaMarc, Andre McMahon, Bren Magruder
{"title":"治疗方案对住院成人急性免疫性血小板减少症的影响。","authors":"Justin Presutto, Abby Rose Broomfield, Sierra Parsons, Morgan LaMarc, Andre McMahon, Bren Magruder","doi":"10.1177/10600280251338604","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Definitive management of acute immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) in hospitalized patients remains variable. A lack of standardized treatment protocols has led to varying treatment sequences and inconsistent utilization of resources. A viable remedy exists in developing a standardized sequential treatment protocol balancing therapeutic efficacy with financial responsibility.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this study was to evaluate the pharmacoeconomic impact and clinical efficacy of an inpatient pharmacist-developed sequential ITP treatment protocol. The primary objective was to evaluate drug cost of ITP treatment per patient pre- versus post-protocol implementation. Secondary objectives included hospital length of stay and platelet count at discharge.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicenter, retrospective, quasi-experimental, institutional review board-approved study assessed hospitalized patients treated for acute ITP between October 2018 and June 2023 at Sarasota Memorial Health Care System. The ITP protocol was implemented on June 1, 2022. Retrospective chart review was performed on adult patients diagnosed with ITP who received one or more medications to treat ITP. Patients less than 18 years old, pregnant, or with sustained platelet counts greater than 100 x 10<sup>3</sup>/µL throughout admission were excluded. Propensity score matching was used to estimate the protocol effect on primary and secondary outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 450 patients screened, 168 met inclusion criteria, with 115 patients assigned to the pre-protocol arm and 53 patients assigned post-protocol. In the pre-protocol cohort, 53 propensity-matched pairs were evaluated. The median drug cost of treatment was significantly higher in the pre- protocol arm compared with post-protocol ($24 899 vs $13 833; <i>P</i> < 0.001). There was no difference in either secondary outcome of median length of hospital stay (5.5 vs 5.2 days; <i>P</i> = 0.987) or median platelet count at discharge (82 vs 72; <i>P</i> = 0.477).</p><p><strong>Conclusion and relevance: </strong>Implementation of a standardized sequential ITP treatment protocol at a community hospital resulted in substantial cost savings while maintaining positive clinical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":7933,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Pharmacotherapy","volume":" ","pages":"10600280251338604"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of a Treatment Protocol for Hospitalized Adults With Acute Immune Thrombocytopenia.\",\"authors\":\"Justin Presutto, Abby Rose Broomfield, Sierra Parsons, Morgan LaMarc, Andre McMahon, Bren Magruder\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10600280251338604\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Definitive management of acute immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) in hospitalized patients remains variable. A lack of standardized treatment protocols has led to varying treatment sequences and inconsistent utilization of resources. A viable remedy exists in developing a standardized sequential treatment protocol balancing therapeutic efficacy with financial responsibility.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this study was to evaluate the pharmacoeconomic impact and clinical efficacy of an inpatient pharmacist-developed sequential ITP treatment protocol. The primary objective was to evaluate drug cost of ITP treatment per patient pre- versus post-protocol implementation. Secondary objectives included hospital length of stay and platelet count at discharge.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicenter, retrospective, quasi-experimental, institutional review board-approved study assessed hospitalized patients treated for acute ITP between October 2018 and June 2023 at Sarasota Memorial Health Care System. The ITP protocol was implemented on June 1, 2022. Retrospective chart review was performed on adult patients diagnosed with ITP who received one or more medications to treat ITP. Patients less than 18 years old, pregnant, or with sustained platelet counts greater than 100 x 10<sup>3</sup>/µL throughout admission were excluded. Propensity score matching was used to estimate the protocol effect on primary and secondary outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 450 patients screened, 168 met inclusion criteria, with 115 patients assigned to the pre-protocol arm and 53 patients assigned post-protocol. In the pre-protocol cohort, 53 propensity-matched pairs were evaluated. The median drug cost of treatment was significantly higher in the pre- protocol arm compared with post-protocol ($24 899 vs $13 833; <i>P</i> < 0.001). There was no difference in either secondary outcome of median length of hospital stay (5.5 vs 5.2 days; <i>P</i> = 0.987) or median platelet count at discharge (82 vs 72; <i>P</i> = 0.477).</p><p><strong>Conclusion and relevance: </strong>Implementation of a standardized sequential ITP treatment protocol at a community hospital resulted in substantial cost savings while maintaining positive clinical outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7933,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Pharmacotherapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"10600280251338604\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Pharmacotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10600280251338604\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Pharmacotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10600280251338604","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:住院患者急性免疫性血小板减少症(ITP)的最终处理仍然存在变数。由于缺乏标准化的治疗方案,导致治疗顺序不一,资源利用不一致。一个可行的补救办法是制定一个标准化的顺序治疗方案,平衡治疗效果和经济责任。目的:本研究的目的是评估住院药师开发的序贯ITP治疗方案的药物经济学影响和临床疗效。主要目的是评估ITP治疗方案实施前后每位患者的药物成本。次要目标包括住院时间和出院时的血小板计数。方法:这项多中心、回顾性、准实验性、机构审查委员会批准的研究评估了2018年10月至2023年6月在萨拉索塔纪念医疗保健系统接受急性ITP治疗的住院患者。ITP协议于2022年6月1日实施。对诊断为ITP并接受一种或多种药物治疗的成人ITP患者进行回顾性图表回顾。排除年龄小于18岁、孕妇或在入院期间持续血小板计数大于100 × 103/µL的患者。倾向评分匹配用于估计方案对主要和次要结局的影响。结果:在筛选的450例患者中,168例符合纳入标准,其中115例患者分配到方案前组,53例患者分配到方案后组。在方案前队列中,评估了53对倾向匹配对。方案前组的中位药物治疗费用显著高于方案后组(24899美元vs 13833美元;P < 0.001)。中位住院时间(5.5天vs 5.2天;P = 0.987)或出院时血小板计数中位数(82 vs 72;P = 0.477)。结论和相关性:在社区医院实施标准化的顺序ITP治疗方案,在保持积极临床结果的同时节省了大量成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of a Treatment Protocol for Hospitalized Adults With Acute Immune Thrombocytopenia.

Background: Definitive management of acute immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) in hospitalized patients remains variable. A lack of standardized treatment protocols has led to varying treatment sequences and inconsistent utilization of resources. A viable remedy exists in developing a standardized sequential treatment protocol balancing therapeutic efficacy with financial responsibility.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the pharmacoeconomic impact and clinical efficacy of an inpatient pharmacist-developed sequential ITP treatment protocol. The primary objective was to evaluate drug cost of ITP treatment per patient pre- versus post-protocol implementation. Secondary objectives included hospital length of stay and platelet count at discharge.

Methods: This multicenter, retrospective, quasi-experimental, institutional review board-approved study assessed hospitalized patients treated for acute ITP between October 2018 and June 2023 at Sarasota Memorial Health Care System. The ITP protocol was implemented on June 1, 2022. Retrospective chart review was performed on adult patients diagnosed with ITP who received one or more medications to treat ITP. Patients less than 18 years old, pregnant, or with sustained platelet counts greater than 100 x 103/µL throughout admission were excluded. Propensity score matching was used to estimate the protocol effect on primary and secondary outcomes.

Results: Of the 450 patients screened, 168 met inclusion criteria, with 115 patients assigned to the pre-protocol arm and 53 patients assigned post-protocol. In the pre-protocol cohort, 53 propensity-matched pairs were evaluated. The median drug cost of treatment was significantly higher in the pre- protocol arm compared with post-protocol ($24 899 vs $13 833; P < 0.001). There was no difference in either secondary outcome of median length of hospital stay (5.5 vs 5.2 days; P = 0.987) or median platelet count at discharge (82 vs 72; P = 0.477).

Conclusion and relevance: Implementation of a standardized sequential ITP treatment protocol at a community hospital resulted in substantial cost savings while maintaining positive clinical outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
166
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Pharmacotherapy (AOP) is a peer-reviewed journal that advances pharmacotherapy throughout the world by publishing high-quality research and review articles to achieve the most desired health outcomes.The articles provide cutting-edge information about the most efficient, safe and cost-effective pharmacotherapy for the treatment and prevention of various illnesses. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). Average time from submission to first decision: 14 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信