相信FDA对药品质量的保证对你的病人的健康是危险的。

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
C Michael White, Lyla R White
{"title":"相信FDA对药品质量的保证对你的病人的健康是危险的。","authors":"C Michael White, Lyla R White","doi":"10.1177/10600280251343626","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) exists to protect US consumers. However, while drug manufacturing has shifted dramatically to developing countries like India and China, the FDA first silently followed a \"trust and not verify\" strategy with virtually no overseas inspections until overwhelming evidence of patient harm had occurred. The implementation of the Generic Drug User Fee Act helped alleviate this problem, but the issue recurred after the COVID-19 pandemic set the FDA far behind in foreign inspections. Regardless, the FDA has never attained parity in inspection frequency and rigor in these countries versus the United States. The FDA still over relies on reports of adverse events, whistleblower reports, and independent laboratory findings to prompt an investigation. When serious issues are found in a manufacturing plant, they redact the products manufactured there so clinicians and patients are unprotected. This has directly harmed US citizens, exposed them to cancer-causing agents, and provided products without the expected benefits. When rates of adverse events were recently compared by manufacturer location, they were found to be markedly higher for manufacturers in emerging countries than advanced countries, especially when a drug's patent has been expired for a longer time. Clinicians may be dismissive of patients claiming that a new version of a generic drug isn't as effective as their previous one or is causing new adverse events, but that could be the case. Healthcare professionals should report these cases to the FDA to raise awareness of potential issues.</p>","PeriodicalId":7933,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Pharmacotherapy","volume":" ","pages":"10600280251343626"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Believing FDA's Assurance of Quality Pharmaceutical Products Can Be Dangerous to Your Patients' Health.\",\"authors\":\"C Michael White, Lyla R White\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10600280251343626\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) exists to protect US consumers. However, while drug manufacturing has shifted dramatically to developing countries like India and China, the FDA first silently followed a \\\"trust and not verify\\\" strategy with virtually no overseas inspections until overwhelming evidence of patient harm had occurred. The implementation of the Generic Drug User Fee Act helped alleviate this problem, but the issue recurred after the COVID-19 pandemic set the FDA far behind in foreign inspections. Regardless, the FDA has never attained parity in inspection frequency and rigor in these countries versus the United States. The FDA still over relies on reports of adverse events, whistleblower reports, and independent laboratory findings to prompt an investigation. When serious issues are found in a manufacturing plant, they redact the products manufactured there so clinicians and patients are unprotected. This has directly harmed US citizens, exposed them to cancer-causing agents, and provided products without the expected benefits. When rates of adverse events were recently compared by manufacturer location, they were found to be markedly higher for manufacturers in emerging countries than advanced countries, especially when a drug's patent has been expired for a longer time. Clinicians may be dismissive of patients claiming that a new version of a generic drug isn't as effective as their previous one or is causing new adverse events, but that could be the case. Healthcare professionals should report these cases to the FDA to raise awareness of potential issues.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7933,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Pharmacotherapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"10600280251343626\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Pharmacotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10600280251343626\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Pharmacotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10600280251343626","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)的存在是为了保护美国消费者。然而,当药品生产急剧转移到印度和中国等发展中国家时,FDA首先默默地遵循“信任而不核实”的策略,实际上没有进行海外检查,直到有大量证据表明患者受到了伤害。《仿制药用户收费法案》的实施帮助缓解了这一问题,但在2019冠状病毒病大流行后,这一问题再次出现,导致FDA在外国检查方面远远落后。无论如何,FDA在这些国家的检查频率和严格程度从未与美国相提并论。FDA仍然过度依赖不良事件报告、举报人报告和独立实验室的发现来推动调查。当在制造工厂发现严重问题时,他们会编辑那里生产的产品,以便临床医生和患者不受保护。这直接伤害了美国公民,使他们暴露于致癌物质中,并提供了没有预期益处的产品。最近,当对制造商所在地的不良事件发生率进行比较时,发现新兴国家的制造商的不良事件发生率明显高于发达国家,特别是当药物专利过期时间较长时。临床医生可能会对声称仿制药的新版本不如之前的有效或引起新的不良事件的患者不屑一顾,但情况可能就是这样。医疗保健专业人员应向FDA报告这些病例,以提高对潜在问题的认识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Believing FDA's Assurance of Quality Pharmaceutical Products Can Be Dangerous to Your Patients' Health.

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) exists to protect US consumers. However, while drug manufacturing has shifted dramatically to developing countries like India and China, the FDA first silently followed a "trust and not verify" strategy with virtually no overseas inspections until overwhelming evidence of patient harm had occurred. The implementation of the Generic Drug User Fee Act helped alleviate this problem, but the issue recurred after the COVID-19 pandemic set the FDA far behind in foreign inspections. Regardless, the FDA has never attained parity in inspection frequency and rigor in these countries versus the United States. The FDA still over relies on reports of adverse events, whistleblower reports, and independent laboratory findings to prompt an investigation. When serious issues are found in a manufacturing plant, they redact the products manufactured there so clinicians and patients are unprotected. This has directly harmed US citizens, exposed them to cancer-causing agents, and provided products without the expected benefits. When rates of adverse events were recently compared by manufacturer location, they were found to be markedly higher for manufacturers in emerging countries than advanced countries, especially when a drug's patent has been expired for a longer time. Clinicians may be dismissive of patients claiming that a new version of a generic drug isn't as effective as their previous one or is causing new adverse events, but that could be the case. Healthcare professionals should report these cases to the FDA to raise awareness of potential issues.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
166
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Pharmacotherapy (AOP) is a peer-reviewed journal that advances pharmacotherapy throughout the world by publishing high-quality research and review articles to achieve the most desired health outcomes.The articles provide cutting-edge information about the most efficient, safe and cost-effective pharmacotherapy for the treatment and prevention of various illnesses. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). Average time from submission to first decision: 14 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信