热成像与多普勒在穿支血管识别中的比较。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Nikitha Potturi, Stephanie H Carpentier, Mark E Feldmann
{"title":"热成像与多普勒在穿支血管识别中的比较。","authors":"Nikitha Potturi, Stephanie H Carpentier, Mark E Feldmann","doi":"10.1097/SAP.0000000000004390","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Precise identification of perforators is necessary for perforator flap planning and success. Various localizing modalities are currently utilized. Doppler is the perioperative modality of choice but can be time consuming and operator dependent. Thermal imaging is an affordable, easy-to-use technology that produces a color image based on surface temperature. This study aims to compare the proficiency and speed of thermal imaging to Doppler in perforator identification.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-one participants (42 thighs) were studied. A circle with a 5-cm radius at the midpoint between theanterior superior iliac spine and lateral patella was marked. Two investigators independently utilized either Doppler or thermal imaging to identify perforators within the marked territory. Thermal hotspots were marked first with invisible UV ink to blind the other investigator, who then scanned the same territory with Doppler. Concordance was determined if respective perforator markings between modalities aligned within 1 cm. After first pass, any nonconcordant thermal hotspots were rescanned with Doppler. Initial time taken and number of perforators found at first pass, first-pass concordance, and overall concordance after Doppler rescan were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At first pass, average time to identify perforators using Doppler was 3.57 minutes and 1.06 minutes using thermal imaging (P < 0.001). Among 42 ALT flap territories, 143 perforators were identified by Doppler and 142 by thermal imaging on initial scan, from which there was 72.5% initial concordance between modalities. Of the 39 nonconcordant thermal hotspots on first pass, an additional 29 then had a Doppler signal confirmed on rescan, resulting in an overall concordance of 93%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>When used as an adjunct for flap planning, thermal imaging allows more efficient perforator identification by more quickly scanning a cutaneous territory and unmasking perforators missed by handheld Doppler alone.</p>","PeriodicalId":8060,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Plastic Surgery","volume":"94 6S Suppl 4","pages":"S568-S571"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparison of Thermal Imaging to Doppler in Perforator Vessel Identification.\",\"authors\":\"Nikitha Potturi, Stephanie H Carpentier, Mark E Feldmann\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/SAP.0000000000004390\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Precise identification of perforators is necessary for perforator flap planning and success. Various localizing modalities are currently utilized. Doppler is the perioperative modality of choice but can be time consuming and operator dependent. Thermal imaging is an affordable, easy-to-use technology that produces a color image based on surface temperature. This study aims to compare the proficiency and speed of thermal imaging to Doppler in perforator identification.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-one participants (42 thighs) were studied. A circle with a 5-cm radius at the midpoint between theanterior superior iliac spine and lateral patella was marked. Two investigators independently utilized either Doppler or thermal imaging to identify perforators within the marked territory. Thermal hotspots were marked first with invisible UV ink to blind the other investigator, who then scanned the same territory with Doppler. Concordance was determined if respective perforator markings between modalities aligned within 1 cm. After first pass, any nonconcordant thermal hotspots were rescanned with Doppler. Initial time taken and number of perforators found at first pass, first-pass concordance, and overall concordance after Doppler rescan were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At first pass, average time to identify perforators using Doppler was 3.57 minutes and 1.06 minutes using thermal imaging (P < 0.001). Among 42 ALT flap territories, 143 perforators were identified by Doppler and 142 by thermal imaging on initial scan, from which there was 72.5% initial concordance between modalities. Of the 39 nonconcordant thermal hotspots on first pass, an additional 29 then had a Doppler signal confirmed on rescan, resulting in an overall concordance of 93%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>When used as an adjunct for flap planning, thermal imaging allows more efficient perforator identification by more quickly scanning a cutaneous territory and unmasking perforators missed by handheld Doppler alone.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8060,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Plastic Surgery\",\"volume\":\"94 6S Suppl 4\",\"pages\":\"S568-S571\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Plastic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000004390\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000004390","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:准确识别穿支是穿支皮瓣规划和成功的必要条件。目前使用了各种本地化方式。多普勒是围手术期的首选方式,但可能耗时且依赖于操作人员。热成像是一种经济实惠、易于使用的技术,可根据表面温度生成彩色图像。本研究的目的是比较热成像和多普勒在穿孔识别中的熟练程度和速度。方法:对21名受试者(42根大腿)进行研究。在髂前上棘和外侧髌骨之间的中点标记一个半径为5cm的圆圈。两名研究人员分别利用多普勒或热成像技术在标记区域内识别穿孔。首先用不可见的UV墨水标记热热点,使另一名研究人员看不见,然后用多普勒扫描同一区域。如果各模式之间的射孔标记排列在1厘米内,则确定一致性。第一次通过后,用多普勒重新扫描任何不一致的热热点。记录首次扫描所花费的时间和发现的穿孔数、首次扫描一致性和多普勒扫描后的整体一致性。结果:首次通过多普勒识别穿支的平均时间为3.57分钟,热成像为1.06分钟(P < 0.001)。在42个ALT皮瓣区域中,初始扫描时多普勒扫描发现143个穿支,热成像发现142个穿支,两者之间有72.5%的初始一致性。在第一次扫描的39个不一致的热热点中,另外29个在重新扫描时得到了多普勒信号的确认,导致总体一致性为93%。结论:当用作皮瓣规划的辅助工具时,热成像通过更快地扫描皮肤区域和发现手持式多普勒单独遗漏的穿支,可以更有效地识别穿支。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Comparison of Thermal Imaging to Doppler in Perforator Vessel Identification.

Background: Precise identification of perforators is necessary for perforator flap planning and success. Various localizing modalities are currently utilized. Doppler is the perioperative modality of choice but can be time consuming and operator dependent. Thermal imaging is an affordable, easy-to-use technology that produces a color image based on surface temperature. This study aims to compare the proficiency and speed of thermal imaging to Doppler in perforator identification.

Methods: Twenty-one participants (42 thighs) were studied. A circle with a 5-cm radius at the midpoint between theanterior superior iliac spine and lateral patella was marked. Two investigators independently utilized either Doppler or thermal imaging to identify perforators within the marked territory. Thermal hotspots were marked first with invisible UV ink to blind the other investigator, who then scanned the same territory with Doppler. Concordance was determined if respective perforator markings between modalities aligned within 1 cm. After first pass, any nonconcordant thermal hotspots were rescanned with Doppler. Initial time taken and number of perforators found at first pass, first-pass concordance, and overall concordance after Doppler rescan were recorded.

Results: At first pass, average time to identify perforators using Doppler was 3.57 minutes and 1.06 minutes using thermal imaging (P < 0.001). Among 42 ALT flap territories, 143 perforators were identified by Doppler and 142 by thermal imaging on initial scan, from which there was 72.5% initial concordance between modalities. Of the 39 nonconcordant thermal hotspots on first pass, an additional 29 then had a Doppler signal confirmed on rescan, resulting in an overall concordance of 93%.

Conclusions: When used as an adjunct for flap planning, thermal imaging allows more efficient perforator identification by more quickly scanning a cutaneous territory and unmasking perforators missed by handheld Doppler alone.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
13.30%
发文量
584
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The only independent journal devoted to general plastic and reconstructive surgery, Annals of Plastic Surgery serves as a forum for current scientific and clinical advances in the field and a sounding board for ideas and perspectives on its future. The journal publishes peer-reviewed original articles, brief communications, case reports, and notes in all areas of interest to the practicing plastic surgeon. There are also historical and current reviews, descriptions of surgical technique, and lively editorials and letters to the editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信