粘接系统对CAD-CAM陶瓷与牙本质和牙釉质粘接强度影响的比较研究。

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
American journal of dentistry Pub Date : 2025-06-01
Burcu Kanat-Ertürk, Begüm Karademir, Yasemin Yildiran-Avcu
{"title":"粘接系统对CAD-CAM陶瓷与牙本质和牙釉质粘接强度影响的比较研究。","authors":"Burcu Kanat-Ertürk, Begüm Karademir, Yasemin Yildiran-Avcu","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the laboratory shear bond strength of four different adhesive systems and to determine the effect of Universal adhesive when bonded to two CAD-CAM ceramics (IPS e.max CAD and Vita Suprinity) to tooth surfaces (enamel and dentin).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>80 human teeth were sectioned to obtain enamel and dentin substrates and embedded into acrylic molds (N= 160). Two CAD-CAM ceramics, including lithium-disilicate glass-ceramic (IPS e.max CAD) and zirconia-reinforced lithium-silicate glass-ceramic (Vita Suprinity), were milled into 2 mm diameter and 2.5 mm height specimens (N= 160). Four adhesive systems were tested: esthetic cement with universal adhesive in total-etch mode (Variolink Esthetic DC with Adhese Universal), total-etch (Variolink II), self-etch (Panavia F 2.0), and self-adhesive (Rely X U200) (n=10/subgroups). Cementation was performed according to the manufacturers' instructions, and shear bond strength test was applied (1mm/minute). Data were statistically analyzed using three-way ANOVA and independent t-tests. Fractured surfaces were also examined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For enamel, the statistically highest values were observed in Variolink Esthetic DC with Adhese Universal and Variolink II, while Rely X U200 showed the lowest values for both ceramics. For dentin, no significant differences were found among most adhesive system groups. Shear bond strength values between IPS e.max CAD and Vita Suprinity were statistically similar for all adhesive systems. Cementation to enamel resulted in higher bond strengths than to dentin, except in the Rely X U200 group, where adhesive failures predominated for both ceramics. Variolink Esthetic DC with Universal Adhesive in total-etch mode produced numerically higher bond strength values for all groups, with a higher incidence of mixed failure types.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>Variolink Esthetic DC with Universal Adhesive in total-etch mode, followed by Variolink II, provided stronger and more durable bonds, with enamel generally resulting in higher shear bond strengths than dentin for both IPS e.max CAD and Vita Suprinity. These findings can guide clinicians in selecting the most appropriate adhesive systems to optimize the longevity and effectiveness of IPS e.max CAD or Vita Suprinity depending on the type of tooth tissue.</p>","PeriodicalId":7538,"journal":{"name":"American journal of dentistry","volume":"38 3","pages":"135-141"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of adhesive systems on the bond strength of CAD-CAM ceramics to enamel and dentin: A comparative study.\",\"authors\":\"Burcu Kanat-Ertürk, Begüm Karademir, Yasemin Yildiran-Avcu\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the laboratory shear bond strength of four different adhesive systems and to determine the effect of Universal adhesive when bonded to two CAD-CAM ceramics (IPS e.max CAD and Vita Suprinity) to tooth surfaces (enamel and dentin).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>80 human teeth were sectioned to obtain enamel and dentin substrates and embedded into acrylic molds (N= 160). Two CAD-CAM ceramics, including lithium-disilicate glass-ceramic (IPS e.max CAD) and zirconia-reinforced lithium-silicate glass-ceramic (Vita Suprinity), were milled into 2 mm diameter and 2.5 mm height specimens (N= 160). Four adhesive systems were tested: esthetic cement with universal adhesive in total-etch mode (Variolink Esthetic DC with Adhese Universal), total-etch (Variolink II), self-etch (Panavia F 2.0), and self-adhesive (Rely X U200) (n=10/subgroups). Cementation was performed according to the manufacturers' instructions, and shear bond strength test was applied (1mm/minute). Data were statistically analyzed using three-way ANOVA and independent t-tests. Fractured surfaces were also examined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For enamel, the statistically highest values were observed in Variolink Esthetic DC with Adhese Universal and Variolink II, while Rely X U200 showed the lowest values for both ceramics. For dentin, no significant differences were found among most adhesive system groups. Shear bond strength values between IPS e.max CAD and Vita Suprinity were statistically similar for all adhesive systems. Cementation to enamel resulted in higher bond strengths than to dentin, except in the Rely X U200 group, where adhesive failures predominated for both ceramics. Variolink Esthetic DC with Universal Adhesive in total-etch mode produced numerically higher bond strength values for all groups, with a higher incidence of mixed failure types.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>Variolink Esthetic DC with Universal Adhesive in total-etch mode, followed by Variolink II, provided stronger and more durable bonds, with enamel generally resulting in higher shear bond strengths than dentin for both IPS e.max CAD and Vita Suprinity. These findings can guide clinicians in selecting the most appropriate adhesive systems to optimize the longevity and effectiveness of IPS e.max CAD or Vita Suprinity depending on the type of tooth tissue.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7538,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of dentistry\",\"volume\":\"38 3\",\"pages\":\"135-141\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价四种不同粘接剂体系的实验室剪切粘接强度,并确定通用粘接剂与两种CAD- cam陶瓷(IPS e.max CAD和Vita Suprinity)在牙表面(牙釉质和牙本质)的粘接效果。方法:对80颗人牙进行切片,获得牙釉质和牙本质基质,植入丙烯酸模内(N= 160)。将两种CAD- cam陶瓷,包括二硅酸锂玻璃陶瓷(IPS e.max CAD)和氧化锆增强锂硅酸盐玻璃陶瓷(Vita Suprinity),铣削成直径为2mm,高度为2.5 mm的样品(N= 160)。测试了四种粘合剂系统:在全蚀刻模式下使用通用粘合剂的美学水泥(Variolink aesthetic DC with adhesive universal)、全蚀刻(Variolink II)、自蚀刻(Panavia F 2.0)和自粘合剂(Rely X U200) (n=10/亚组)。按照厂家说明书进行胶结,并进行剪切粘结强度测试(1mm/min)。数据采用三向方差分析和独立t检验进行统计学分析。断裂表面也进行了检查。结果:对于牙釉质,Variolink美学DC与Adhese Universal和Variolink II在统计学上的值最高,而Rely X U200在两种陶瓷上的值最低。对于牙本质,大多数粘接剂组间无显著差异。IPS e.max CAD和Vita suprity之间的剪切强度值在所有粘合系统中具有统计学上的相似性。除了Rely X U200组外,牙釉质的粘接强度高于牙本质,两种陶瓷的粘接失败占主导地位。在全蚀刻模式下,Variolink aesthetic DC与通用粘合剂在所有组中产生更高的数值粘合强度值,混合失效类型的发生率更高。临床意义:Variolink美学直壁在全蚀刻模式下使用通用粘接剂,随后使用Variolink II,提供更坚固耐用的粘接,对于IPS e.max CAD和Vita Suprinity来说,牙釉质通常比牙本质具有更高的剪切粘接强度。这些发现可以指导临床医生根据牙齿组织类型选择最合适的粘接剂系统,以优化IPS e.max CAD或Vita Suprinity的使用寿命和有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of adhesive systems on the bond strength of CAD-CAM ceramics to enamel and dentin: A comparative study.

Purpose: To evaluate the laboratory shear bond strength of four different adhesive systems and to determine the effect of Universal adhesive when bonded to two CAD-CAM ceramics (IPS e.max CAD and Vita Suprinity) to tooth surfaces (enamel and dentin).

Methods: 80 human teeth were sectioned to obtain enamel and dentin substrates and embedded into acrylic molds (N= 160). Two CAD-CAM ceramics, including lithium-disilicate glass-ceramic (IPS e.max CAD) and zirconia-reinforced lithium-silicate glass-ceramic (Vita Suprinity), were milled into 2 mm diameter and 2.5 mm height specimens (N= 160). Four adhesive systems were tested: esthetic cement with universal adhesive in total-etch mode (Variolink Esthetic DC with Adhese Universal), total-etch (Variolink II), self-etch (Panavia F 2.0), and self-adhesive (Rely X U200) (n=10/subgroups). Cementation was performed according to the manufacturers' instructions, and shear bond strength test was applied (1mm/minute). Data were statistically analyzed using three-way ANOVA and independent t-tests. Fractured surfaces were also examined.

Results: For enamel, the statistically highest values were observed in Variolink Esthetic DC with Adhese Universal and Variolink II, while Rely X U200 showed the lowest values for both ceramics. For dentin, no significant differences were found among most adhesive system groups. Shear bond strength values between IPS e.max CAD and Vita Suprinity were statistically similar for all adhesive systems. Cementation to enamel resulted in higher bond strengths than to dentin, except in the Rely X U200 group, where adhesive failures predominated for both ceramics. Variolink Esthetic DC with Universal Adhesive in total-etch mode produced numerically higher bond strength values for all groups, with a higher incidence of mixed failure types.

Clinical significance: Variolink Esthetic DC with Universal Adhesive in total-etch mode, followed by Variolink II, provided stronger and more durable bonds, with enamel generally resulting in higher shear bond strengths than dentin for both IPS e.max CAD and Vita Suprinity. These findings can guide clinicians in selecting the most appropriate adhesive systems to optimize the longevity and effectiveness of IPS e.max CAD or Vita Suprinity depending on the type of tooth tissue.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American journal of dentistry
American journal of dentistry 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
57
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Dentistry, published by Mosher & Linder, Inc., provides peer-reviewed scientific articles with clinical significance for the general dental practitioner.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信