Mogen钳、Gomco钳和Plastibell钳对新生儿包皮环切术后疗效的比较分析。

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
American Surgeon Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-03 DOI:10.1177/00031348251346523
Julianne C Mallinger, Rachel Siretskiy, Azalia Avila, Jamie Tichauer, Lisa Rivas, Shenae Samuels, Holly Neville, Tamar Levene
{"title":"Mogen钳、Gomco钳和Plastibell钳对新生儿包皮环切术后疗效的比较分析。","authors":"Julianne C Mallinger, Rachel Siretskiy, Azalia Avila, Jamie Tichauer, Lisa Rivas, Shenae Samuels, Holly Neville, Tamar Levene","doi":"10.1177/00031348251346523","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Circumcisions using local anesthesia are among the most common procedures performed in the neonatal period and are typically performed using one of three techniques-Mogen clamp, Gomco clamp, or Plastibell device. Comparative data regarding outcomes, specifically rates of complications such as bleeding for which emergency room (ER) evaluation and intervention are indicated as well as operative revision of circumcision, remain unknown. This retrospective review aimed to better define rates of complications for each of the three procedure types. There were statistically significant differences between the three circumcision types as they relate to the subjective report of pain, but there were no statistically significant differences between the three circumcision modalities regarding rates of complications or return to the ER. Neonatal local circumcisions by these devices are all well tolerated with no demonstrable differences in outcomes. Careful patient selection and surgeon preference should continue to drive the approach utilized.</p>","PeriodicalId":7782,"journal":{"name":"American Surgeon","volume":" ","pages":"1263-1266"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Analysis of Postoperative Outcomes Following Various Neonatal Circumcision Techniques: Mogen Clamp, Gomco Clamp, and Plastibell Device.\",\"authors\":\"Julianne C Mallinger, Rachel Siretskiy, Azalia Avila, Jamie Tichauer, Lisa Rivas, Shenae Samuels, Holly Neville, Tamar Levene\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00031348251346523\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Circumcisions using local anesthesia are among the most common procedures performed in the neonatal period and are typically performed using one of three techniques-Mogen clamp, Gomco clamp, or Plastibell device. Comparative data regarding outcomes, specifically rates of complications such as bleeding for which emergency room (ER) evaluation and intervention are indicated as well as operative revision of circumcision, remain unknown. This retrospective review aimed to better define rates of complications for each of the three procedure types. There were statistically significant differences between the three circumcision types as they relate to the subjective report of pain, but there were no statistically significant differences between the three circumcision modalities regarding rates of complications or return to the ER. Neonatal local circumcisions by these devices are all well tolerated with no demonstrable differences in outcomes. Careful patient selection and surgeon preference should continue to drive the approach utilized.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7782,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Surgeon\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1263-1266\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Surgeon\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00031348251346523\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Surgeon","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00031348251346523","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

局部麻醉包皮环切术是新生儿时期最常见的手术之一,通常使用三种技术之一- mogen钳,Gomco钳或Plastibell装置。关于结果的比较数据,特别是并发症的发生率,如出血,需要急诊室(ER)评估和干预,以及包皮环切术的手术修改,仍然未知。本回顾性研究旨在更好地确定三种手术类型的并发症发生率。三种包皮环切术类型在主观疼痛报告方面存在统计学上的显著差异,但三种包皮环切术方式在并发症发生率或重返急诊室方面没有统计学上的显著差异。这些装置对新生儿局部包皮环切的耐受性都很好,在结果上没有明显的差异。谨慎的患者选择和外科医生的偏好应继续推动所采用的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative Analysis of Postoperative Outcomes Following Various Neonatal Circumcision Techniques: Mogen Clamp, Gomco Clamp, and Plastibell Device.

Circumcisions using local anesthesia are among the most common procedures performed in the neonatal period and are typically performed using one of three techniques-Mogen clamp, Gomco clamp, or Plastibell device. Comparative data regarding outcomes, specifically rates of complications such as bleeding for which emergency room (ER) evaluation and intervention are indicated as well as operative revision of circumcision, remain unknown. This retrospective review aimed to better define rates of complications for each of the three procedure types. There were statistically significant differences between the three circumcision types as they relate to the subjective report of pain, but there were no statistically significant differences between the three circumcision modalities regarding rates of complications or return to the ER. Neonatal local circumcisions by these devices are all well tolerated with no demonstrable differences in outcomes. Careful patient selection and surgeon preference should continue to drive the approach utilized.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American Surgeon
American Surgeon 医学-外科
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
623
期刊介绍: The American Surgeon is a monthly peer-reviewed publication published by the Southeastern Surgical Congress. Its area of concentration is clinical general surgery, as defined by the content areas of the American Board of Surgery: alimentary tract (including bariatric surgery), abdomen and its contents, breast, skin and soft tissue, endocrine system, solid organ transplantation, pediatric surgery, surgical critical care, surgical oncology (including head and neck surgery), trauma and emergency surgery, and vascular surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信