基于lstm增强编码器网络的区域对流层延迟预测模型

IF 4.7 2区 地球科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
Yuanfang Peng;Chenglin Cai;Zexian Li;Kaihui Lv;Xue Zhang;Yihao Cai
{"title":"基于lstm增强编码器网络的区域对流层延迟预测模型","authors":"Yuanfang Peng;Chenglin Cai;Zexian Li;Kaihui Lv;Xue Zhang;Yihao Cai","doi":"10.1109/JSTARS.2025.3565569","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Precise modeling of zenith tropospheric delay (ZTD) is essential for real-time high-precision positioning in global navigation satellite systems. Due to the stochastic variability of atmospheric water vapor across different regions, tropospheric delay exhibits strong regional characteristics. Empirical tropospheric delay models built on the reanalysis of meteorological data often show significant accuracy discrepancies across regions, failing to meet the needs for precise regional ZTD forecasting. Deep learning methods excel in learning complex patterns and dependencies from time-series data. Our study utilized ZTD data from 178 Nevada Geodetic Laboratory stations in Australia during 2023 as ground truth values and modeled them using a long short-term memory (LSTM)-enhanced encoder network. This model incorporated both spatial and temporal information as well as correlations with GPT3 ZTD. Predictions were compared with those from GPT3 ZTD, ERA5 ZTD, artificial neural network (ANN) ZTD, general regression neural network (GRNN) ZTD, and LSTM ZTD. The results showed that the LSTM-enhanced encoder ZTD achieved a root-mean-square error (RMSE) of 14.43 mm and a mean bias close to zero, with mean absolute error and mean correlation coefficient of 12.42 mm and 0.95, respectively. The proposed model outperforms the GPT3, ERA5, ANN, GRNN, and LSTM models, with respective RMSE improvements of approximately 62.3%, 12.3%, 61%, 59.9%, and 60% . In addition, we compared the spatial and temporal properties of the proposed model with those of the GPT3 and ERA5 models. The discussion section further analyzed the prediction performance of different neural network approaches under different prediction periods.","PeriodicalId":13116,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing","volume":"18 ","pages":"13348-13358"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=10980316","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Regional Tropospheric Delay Prediction Model Based on LSTM-Enhanced Encoder Network\",\"authors\":\"Yuanfang Peng;Chenglin Cai;Zexian Li;Kaihui Lv;Xue Zhang;Yihao Cai\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/JSTARS.2025.3565569\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Precise modeling of zenith tropospheric delay (ZTD) is essential for real-time high-precision positioning in global navigation satellite systems. Due to the stochastic variability of atmospheric water vapor across different regions, tropospheric delay exhibits strong regional characteristics. Empirical tropospheric delay models built on the reanalysis of meteorological data often show significant accuracy discrepancies across regions, failing to meet the needs for precise regional ZTD forecasting. Deep learning methods excel in learning complex patterns and dependencies from time-series data. Our study utilized ZTD data from 178 Nevada Geodetic Laboratory stations in Australia during 2023 as ground truth values and modeled them using a long short-term memory (LSTM)-enhanced encoder network. This model incorporated both spatial and temporal information as well as correlations with GPT3 ZTD. Predictions were compared with those from GPT3 ZTD, ERA5 ZTD, artificial neural network (ANN) ZTD, general regression neural network (GRNN) ZTD, and LSTM ZTD. The results showed that the LSTM-enhanced encoder ZTD achieved a root-mean-square error (RMSE) of 14.43 mm and a mean bias close to zero, with mean absolute error and mean correlation coefficient of 12.42 mm and 0.95, respectively. The proposed model outperforms the GPT3, ERA5, ANN, GRNN, and LSTM models, with respective RMSE improvements of approximately 62.3%, 12.3%, 61%, 59.9%, and 60% . In addition, we compared the spatial and temporal properties of the proposed model with those of the GPT3 and ERA5 models. The discussion section further analyzed the prediction performance of different neural network approaches under different prediction periods.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13116,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing\",\"volume\":\"18 \",\"pages\":\"13348-13358\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=10980316\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10980316/\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10980316/","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

精确的天顶对流层延迟(ZTD)建模是全球卫星导航系统实时高精度定位的关键。由于大气水汽在不同区域的随机变率,对流层延迟表现出强烈的区域特征。建立在气象资料再分析基础上的经验对流层延迟模式在区域间往往存在较大的精度差异,不能满足区域ZTD精确预报的需要。深度学习方法擅长从时间序列数据中学习复杂模式和依赖关系。我们的研究利用2023年澳大利亚内华达大地测量实验室178个站点的ZTD数据作为地面真值,并使用长短期记忆(LSTM)增强编码器网络对其进行建模。该模型结合了时空信息以及与GPT3 ZTD的相关性。比较GPT3 ZTD、ERA5 ZTD、人工神经网络(ANN) ZTD、广义回归神经网络(GRNN) ZTD和LSTM ZTD的预测结果。结果表明,lstm增强编码器ZTD的均方根误差(RMSE)为14.43 mm,平均偏差接近于零,平均绝对误差和平均相关系数分别为12.42 mm和0.95。该模型优于GPT3、ERA5、ANN、GRNN和LSTM模型,RMSE分别提高了约62.3%、12.3%、61%、59.9%和60%。此外,我们还将该模型与GPT3和ERA5模型的时空特性进行了比较。讨论部分进一步分析了不同神经网络方法在不同预测周期下的预测性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Regional Tropospheric Delay Prediction Model Based on LSTM-Enhanced Encoder Network
Precise modeling of zenith tropospheric delay (ZTD) is essential for real-time high-precision positioning in global navigation satellite systems. Due to the stochastic variability of atmospheric water vapor across different regions, tropospheric delay exhibits strong regional characteristics. Empirical tropospheric delay models built on the reanalysis of meteorological data often show significant accuracy discrepancies across regions, failing to meet the needs for precise regional ZTD forecasting. Deep learning methods excel in learning complex patterns and dependencies from time-series data. Our study utilized ZTD data from 178 Nevada Geodetic Laboratory stations in Australia during 2023 as ground truth values and modeled them using a long short-term memory (LSTM)-enhanced encoder network. This model incorporated both spatial and temporal information as well as correlations with GPT3 ZTD. Predictions were compared with those from GPT3 ZTD, ERA5 ZTD, artificial neural network (ANN) ZTD, general regression neural network (GRNN) ZTD, and LSTM ZTD. The results showed that the LSTM-enhanced encoder ZTD achieved a root-mean-square error (RMSE) of 14.43 mm and a mean bias close to zero, with mean absolute error and mean correlation coefficient of 12.42 mm and 0.95, respectively. The proposed model outperforms the GPT3, ERA5, ANN, GRNN, and LSTM models, with respective RMSE improvements of approximately 62.3%, 12.3%, 61%, 59.9%, and 60% . In addition, we compared the spatial and temporal properties of the proposed model with those of the GPT3 and ERA5 models. The discussion section further analyzed the prediction performance of different neural network approaches under different prediction periods.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
10.90%
发文量
563
审稿时长
4.7 months
期刊介绍: The IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing addresses the growing field of applications in Earth observations and remote sensing, and also provides a venue for the rapidly expanding special issues that are being sponsored by the IEEE Geosciences and Remote Sensing Society. The journal draws upon the experience of the highly successful “IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing” and provide a complementary medium for the wide range of topics in applied earth observations. The ‘Applications’ areas encompasses the societal benefit areas of the Global Earth Observations Systems of Systems (GEOSS) program. Through deliberations over two years, ministers from 50 countries agreed to identify nine areas where Earth observation could positively impact the quality of life and health of their respective countries. Some of these are areas not traditionally addressed in the IEEE context. These include biodiversity, health and climate. Yet it is the skill sets of IEEE members, in areas such as observations, communications, computers, signal processing, standards and ocean engineering, that form the technical underpinnings of GEOSS. Thus, the Journal attracts a broad range of interests that serves both present members in new ways and expands the IEEE visibility into new areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信