EpiCare:动态治疗方案的强化学习基准。

Mason Hargrave, Alex Spaeth, Logan Grosenick
{"title":"EpiCare:动态治疗方案的强化学习基准。","authors":"Mason Hargrave, Alex Spaeth, Logan Grosenick","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Healthcare applications pose significant challenges to existing reinforcement learning (RL) methods due to implementation risks, limited data availability, short treatment episodes, sparse rewards, partial observations, and heterogeneous treatment effects. Despite significant interest in using RL to generate dynamic treatment regimes for longitudinal patient care scenarios, no standardized benchmark has yet been developed. To fill this need we introduce <i>Episodes of Care</i> (<i>EpiCare</i>), a benchmark designed to mimic the challenges associated with applying RL to longitudinal healthcare settings. We leverage this benchmark to test five state-of-the-art offline RL models as well as five common off-policy evaluation (OPE) techniques. Our results suggest that while offline RL may be capable of improving upon existing standards of care given sufficient data, its applicability does not appear to extend to the moderate to low data regimes typical of current healthcare settings. Additionally, we demonstrate that several OPE techniques standard in the the medical RL literature fail to perform adequately on our benchmark. These results suggest that the performance of RL models in dynamic treatment regimes may be difficult to meaningfully evaluate using current OPE methods, indicating that RL for this application domain may still be in its early stages. We hope that these results along with the benchmark will facilitate better comparison of existing methods and inspire further research into techniques that increase the practical applicability of medical RL.</p>","PeriodicalId":72099,"journal":{"name":"Advances in neural information processing systems","volume":"37 ","pages":"130536-130568"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12124763/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"<i>EpiCare</i>: A Reinforcement Learning Benchmark for Dynamic Treatment Regimes.\",\"authors\":\"Mason Hargrave, Alex Spaeth, Logan Grosenick\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Healthcare applications pose significant challenges to existing reinforcement learning (RL) methods due to implementation risks, limited data availability, short treatment episodes, sparse rewards, partial observations, and heterogeneous treatment effects. Despite significant interest in using RL to generate dynamic treatment regimes for longitudinal patient care scenarios, no standardized benchmark has yet been developed. To fill this need we introduce <i>Episodes of Care</i> (<i>EpiCare</i>), a benchmark designed to mimic the challenges associated with applying RL to longitudinal healthcare settings. We leverage this benchmark to test five state-of-the-art offline RL models as well as five common off-policy evaluation (OPE) techniques. Our results suggest that while offline RL may be capable of improving upon existing standards of care given sufficient data, its applicability does not appear to extend to the moderate to low data regimes typical of current healthcare settings. Additionally, we demonstrate that several OPE techniques standard in the the medical RL literature fail to perform adequately on our benchmark. These results suggest that the performance of RL models in dynamic treatment regimes may be difficult to meaningfully evaluate using current OPE methods, indicating that RL for this application domain may still be in its early stages. We hope that these results along with the benchmark will facilitate better comparison of existing methods and inspire further research into techniques that increase the practical applicability of medical RL.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72099,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in neural information processing systems\",\"volume\":\"37 \",\"pages\":\"130536-130568\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12124763/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in neural information processing systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in neural information processing systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

医疗保健应用对现有的强化学习(RL)方法提出了重大挑战,原因包括实施风险、有限的数据可用性、较短的治疗时间、稀疏的奖励、部分观察和不同的治疗效果。尽管人们对使用RL为纵向患者护理方案生成动态治疗方案非常感兴趣,但尚未制定标准化基准。为了满足这一需求,我们引入了护理情节(EpiCare),这是一个基准,旨在模拟将强化学习应用于纵向医疗保健设置时所面临的挑战。我们利用这个基准测试了五种最先进的离线RL模型以及五种常见的非策略评估(OPE)技术。我们的研究结果表明,虽然线下强化学习可能能够在现有的护理标准上得到改善,但它的适用性似乎并没有扩展到当前医疗保健环境中典型的中低数据体系。此外,我们证明了医学RL文献中的几种OPE技术标准在我们的基准测试中表现不佳。这些结果表明,RL模型在动态处理方案中的性能可能难以使用当前的OPE方法进行有意义的评估,这表明RL在该应用领域可能仍处于早期阶段。我们希望这些结果以及基准将有助于更好地比较现有方法,并激发对提高医疗RL实际适用性的技术的进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
EpiCare: A Reinforcement Learning Benchmark for Dynamic Treatment Regimes.

Healthcare applications pose significant challenges to existing reinforcement learning (RL) methods due to implementation risks, limited data availability, short treatment episodes, sparse rewards, partial observations, and heterogeneous treatment effects. Despite significant interest in using RL to generate dynamic treatment regimes for longitudinal patient care scenarios, no standardized benchmark has yet been developed. To fill this need we introduce Episodes of Care (EpiCare), a benchmark designed to mimic the challenges associated with applying RL to longitudinal healthcare settings. We leverage this benchmark to test five state-of-the-art offline RL models as well as five common off-policy evaluation (OPE) techniques. Our results suggest that while offline RL may be capable of improving upon existing standards of care given sufficient data, its applicability does not appear to extend to the moderate to low data regimes typical of current healthcare settings. Additionally, we demonstrate that several OPE techniques standard in the the medical RL literature fail to perform adequately on our benchmark. These results suggest that the performance of RL models in dynamic treatment regimes may be difficult to meaningfully evaluate using current OPE methods, indicating that RL for this application domain may still be in its early stages. We hope that these results along with the benchmark will facilitate better comparison of existing methods and inspire further research into techniques that increase the practical applicability of medical RL.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信