伊朗学生性别歧视与跨性别恐惧症量表的心理测量特征。

IF 2.8 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Health Promotion Perspectives Pub Date : 2025-05-06 eCollection Date: 2025-05-01 DOI:10.34172/hpp.025.43507
Ali Reza Shafiee-Kandjani, Sara Tajlil, Asal Raeisnia, Şenol Turan, Behzad Shalchi
{"title":"伊朗学生性别歧视与跨性别恐惧症量表的心理测量特征。","authors":"Ali Reza Shafiee-Kandjani, Sara Tajlil, Asal Raeisnia, Şenol Turan, Behzad Shalchi","doi":"10.34172/hpp.025.43507","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although the prevalence of transgender individuals has increased, there is currently no scale that aligns with Iranian culture to assess transphobia. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Persian version of the Genderism and Transphobia Scale (GTS), and its cross-cultural adaptation in an Iranian setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This psychometric study involved 418 students in Tabriz, northwestern Iran. Forward-backward translation was conducted to develop a Persian version of the scale. Reliability was assessed using test-retest, Cronbach's alpha, and the interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) test. Face, content, and construct validity were also evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Cronbach's alpha was 0.91 for transphobia/genderism (T/G), 0.83 for gender-bashing (GB) and 0.91 for the total GTS. The results of the exploratory factor analysis (EFA) showed that the two factors, T/G and GB, collectively explained 47.05% of the total variance. The ICCs for different factors of the Persian-GTS including T/G, GB, and GTS total were r=0.79 (Confidence interval [CI] 95%; 0.86 - 0.90), r=0.65 (CI 95%; 0.71 - 0.80), and r=0.98 (CI 95%; 0.68 - 0.79), respectively. An EFA identified two factors defining 47.05% of all the variance. Items number 8 and 31 were removed from the Persian version of GTS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Persian-GTS was identified to be valid and reliable for evaluating students' attitudes toward transgender individuals. Consequently, the Persian-GTS can be utilized in research concerning health issues related to transgender individuals.</p>","PeriodicalId":46588,"journal":{"name":"Health Promotion Perspectives","volume":"15 1","pages":"73-81"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12125500/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Psychometric properties of the genderism and transphobia scale in Iranian students.\",\"authors\":\"Ali Reza Shafiee-Kandjani, Sara Tajlil, Asal Raeisnia, Şenol Turan, Behzad Shalchi\",\"doi\":\"10.34172/hpp.025.43507\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although the prevalence of transgender individuals has increased, there is currently no scale that aligns with Iranian culture to assess transphobia. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Persian version of the Genderism and Transphobia Scale (GTS), and its cross-cultural adaptation in an Iranian setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This psychometric study involved 418 students in Tabriz, northwestern Iran. Forward-backward translation was conducted to develop a Persian version of the scale. Reliability was assessed using test-retest, Cronbach's alpha, and the interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) test. Face, content, and construct validity were also evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Cronbach's alpha was 0.91 for transphobia/genderism (T/G), 0.83 for gender-bashing (GB) and 0.91 for the total GTS. The results of the exploratory factor analysis (EFA) showed that the two factors, T/G and GB, collectively explained 47.05% of the total variance. The ICCs for different factors of the Persian-GTS including T/G, GB, and GTS total were r=0.79 (Confidence interval [CI] 95%; 0.86 - 0.90), r=0.65 (CI 95%; 0.71 - 0.80), and r=0.98 (CI 95%; 0.68 - 0.79), respectively. An EFA identified two factors defining 47.05% of all the variance. Items number 8 and 31 were removed from the Persian version of GTS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Persian-GTS was identified to be valid and reliable for evaluating students' attitudes toward transgender individuals. Consequently, the Persian-GTS can be utilized in research concerning health issues related to transgender individuals.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46588,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Promotion Perspectives\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"73-81\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12125500/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Promotion Perspectives\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.34172/hpp.025.43507\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Promotion Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/hpp.025.43507","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:虽然变性人的流行率有所增加,但目前还没有一个与伊朗文化相一致的量表来评估变性恐惧症。因此,本研究旨在评估波斯语版性别歧视与跨性别恐惧症量表(GTS)的效度和信度,及其在伊朗情境下的跨文化适应性。方法:对伊朗西北部大不里士的418名学生进行心理测量学研究。为了发展出波斯版本的音阶,进行了向前向后的翻译。信度评估采用重测、Cronbach’s alpha和类间相关系数(ICC)检验。此外,还评估了面孔、内容和结构效度。结果:跨性别恐惧症/性别歧视(T/G)的Cronbach’s alpha为0.91,性别抨击(GB)的Cronbach’s alpha为0.83,总GTS的Cronbach’s alpha为0.91。探索性因子分析(EFA)结果显示,T/G和GB两个因子共同解释了总方差的47.05%。不同因素的ICCs包括T/G、GB和GTS总量r=0.79(置信区间[CI] 95%;0.86 - 0.90), r=0.65 (CI 95%;0.71 - 0.80), r=0.98 (CI 95%;0.68 - 0.79)。EFA确定了两个因素,确定了47.05%的方差。第8项和第31项从波斯语版本的GTS中删除。结论:波斯- gts量表可有效、可靠地评估学生对跨性别者的态度。因此,波斯语- gts可用于研究与跨性别者有关的健康问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Psychometric properties of the genderism and transphobia scale in Iranian students.

Psychometric properties of the genderism and transphobia scale in Iranian students.

Psychometric properties of the genderism and transphobia scale in Iranian students.

Background: Although the prevalence of transgender individuals has increased, there is currently no scale that aligns with Iranian culture to assess transphobia. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Persian version of the Genderism and Transphobia Scale (GTS), and its cross-cultural adaptation in an Iranian setting.

Methods: This psychometric study involved 418 students in Tabriz, northwestern Iran. Forward-backward translation was conducted to develop a Persian version of the scale. Reliability was assessed using test-retest, Cronbach's alpha, and the interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) test. Face, content, and construct validity were also evaluated.

Results: The Cronbach's alpha was 0.91 for transphobia/genderism (T/G), 0.83 for gender-bashing (GB) and 0.91 for the total GTS. The results of the exploratory factor analysis (EFA) showed that the two factors, T/G and GB, collectively explained 47.05% of the total variance. The ICCs for different factors of the Persian-GTS including T/G, GB, and GTS total were r=0.79 (Confidence interval [CI] 95%; 0.86 - 0.90), r=0.65 (CI 95%; 0.71 - 0.80), and r=0.98 (CI 95%; 0.68 - 0.79), respectively. An EFA identified two factors defining 47.05% of all the variance. Items number 8 and 31 were removed from the Persian version of GTS.

Conclusion: The Persian-GTS was identified to be valid and reliable for evaluating students' attitudes toward transgender individuals. Consequently, the Persian-GTS can be utilized in research concerning health issues related to transgender individuals.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Promotion Perspectives
Health Promotion Perspectives PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
2.30%
发文量
27
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信