纵向真实领导档案的性质与结果。

IF 3.4 Q1 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Journal of Healthcare Leadership Pub Date : 2025-05-25 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/JHL.S486730
Baptiste Cougot, Nicolas Gillet, Jules Gauvin, Florian Ollierou, Alice Le Saout, Leïla Moret, Dominique Tripodi
{"title":"纵向真实领导档案的性质与结果。","authors":"Baptiste Cougot, Nicolas Gillet, Jules Gauvin, Florian Ollierou, Alice Le Saout, Leïla Moret, Dominique Tripodi","doi":"10.2147/JHL.S486730","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Although authentic leadership is known to improve caregivers' functioning, health, and quality of care, information is lacking about whether the authentic leadership subdimensions may be distinguished from an overarching authentic leadership global construct, and how these global and specific factors can combine within various profiles to explain outcomes over time. Relying on an integration of person- and variable-centered perspectives, this study aims to provide a deeper understanding of the dimensionality of the authentic leadership construct. Specifically, it aims to examine the profiles taken by authentic leadership dimensions, document their stability over time, and explore the associations between these profiles and outcomes (need satisfaction, anhedonia, and safety of care).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A questionnaire was completed twice over a one-year period by 750 healthcare professionals. Latent transition analysis was the primary method of analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our results showed that employees' perceptions of authentic leadership behaviors reflected an overarching construct simultaneously coexisting with four specific dimensions (self-awareness, internalized moral perspective, relational transparency, and balanced processing). We identified four profiles highly stable over time: <i>Low Global Authentic, Normative, Low Specific Self-Awareness</i>, and <i>High Specific Balanced Processing</i>. Finally, employees' global and specific (relatedness, competence, and autonomy) levels of need satisfaction as well as perceptions of safety of care and anhedonia differed as a function of their profile, with the most positive outcomes associated with the <i>Normative</i> profile.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In addition to confirming that authentic leadership may be studied as a global construct, this study highlights the importance of considering the combinations of global and specific factors in explaining variations in caregivers' need satisfaction, anhedonia, and quality of care over a one year-period. Our findings suggest that managers should strive to implement a complete array of authentic leadership behaviors at a balanced level to ensure positive outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":44346,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Healthcare Leadership","volume":"17 ","pages":"189-209"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12123637/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nature and Outcomes of Longitudinal Authentic Leadership Profiles.\",\"authors\":\"Baptiste Cougot, Nicolas Gillet, Jules Gauvin, Florian Ollierou, Alice Le Saout, Leïla Moret, Dominique Tripodi\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/JHL.S486730\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Although authentic leadership is known to improve caregivers' functioning, health, and quality of care, information is lacking about whether the authentic leadership subdimensions may be distinguished from an overarching authentic leadership global construct, and how these global and specific factors can combine within various profiles to explain outcomes over time. Relying on an integration of person- and variable-centered perspectives, this study aims to provide a deeper understanding of the dimensionality of the authentic leadership construct. Specifically, it aims to examine the profiles taken by authentic leadership dimensions, document their stability over time, and explore the associations between these profiles and outcomes (need satisfaction, anhedonia, and safety of care).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A questionnaire was completed twice over a one-year period by 750 healthcare professionals. Latent transition analysis was the primary method of analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our results showed that employees' perceptions of authentic leadership behaviors reflected an overarching construct simultaneously coexisting with four specific dimensions (self-awareness, internalized moral perspective, relational transparency, and balanced processing). We identified four profiles highly stable over time: <i>Low Global Authentic, Normative, Low Specific Self-Awareness</i>, and <i>High Specific Balanced Processing</i>. Finally, employees' global and specific (relatedness, competence, and autonomy) levels of need satisfaction as well as perceptions of safety of care and anhedonia differed as a function of their profile, with the most positive outcomes associated with the <i>Normative</i> profile.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In addition to confirming that authentic leadership may be studied as a global construct, this study highlights the importance of considering the combinations of global and specific factors in explaining variations in caregivers' need satisfaction, anhedonia, and quality of care over a one year-period. Our findings suggest that managers should strive to implement a complete array of authentic leadership behaviors at a balanced level to ensure positive outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44346,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Healthcare Leadership\",\"volume\":\"17 \",\"pages\":\"189-209\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12123637/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Healthcare Leadership\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/JHL.S486730\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Healthcare Leadership","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JHL.S486730","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:虽然我们知道真实领导可以改善照顾者的功能、健康和护理质量,但关于真实领导子维度是否可以从总体的真实领导全局结构中区分出来,以及这些全局和特定因素如何在不同的概况中结合起来,以解释随时间推移的结果,这些信息是缺乏的。本研究结合以人为中心与以变量为中心的视角,旨在对真实领导建构的维度有更深入的了解。具体而言,本研究旨在研究真实领导维度的特征,记录其随时间的稳定性,并探索这些特征与结果(需求满意度、快感缺乏症和护理安全性)之间的关系。方法:对750名卫生保健专业人员进行为期一年的两次问卷调查。潜在转移分析是主要的分析方法。结果:本研究发现,员工对真实领导行为的认知反映了一个总体结构,同时存在四个具体维度(自我意识、内化道德视角、关系透明度和平衡处理)。我们确定了随着时间的推移高度稳定的四种概况:低全局真实性,规范性,低特异性自我意识和高特异性平衡处理。最后,员工的整体和特定(相关性,能力和自主性)需求满意度水平以及对护理安全性和快感缺乏症的感知作为其概况的函数而不同,最积极的结果与规范概况相关。结论:除了证实真实领导可以作为一个全球性的结构来研究外,本研究还强调了在解释一年内照顾者需求满意度、快感缺乏和护理质量的变化时,考虑整体和特定因素的组合的重要性。我们的研究结果表明,管理者应该努力在平衡的水平上实施一整套真实的领导行为,以确保积极的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Nature and Outcomes of Longitudinal Authentic Leadership Profiles.

Purpose: Although authentic leadership is known to improve caregivers' functioning, health, and quality of care, information is lacking about whether the authentic leadership subdimensions may be distinguished from an overarching authentic leadership global construct, and how these global and specific factors can combine within various profiles to explain outcomes over time. Relying on an integration of person- and variable-centered perspectives, this study aims to provide a deeper understanding of the dimensionality of the authentic leadership construct. Specifically, it aims to examine the profiles taken by authentic leadership dimensions, document their stability over time, and explore the associations between these profiles and outcomes (need satisfaction, anhedonia, and safety of care).

Methods: A questionnaire was completed twice over a one-year period by 750 healthcare professionals. Latent transition analysis was the primary method of analysis.

Results: Our results showed that employees' perceptions of authentic leadership behaviors reflected an overarching construct simultaneously coexisting with four specific dimensions (self-awareness, internalized moral perspective, relational transparency, and balanced processing). We identified four profiles highly stable over time: Low Global Authentic, Normative, Low Specific Self-Awareness, and High Specific Balanced Processing. Finally, employees' global and specific (relatedness, competence, and autonomy) levels of need satisfaction as well as perceptions of safety of care and anhedonia differed as a function of their profile, with the most positive outcomes associated with the Normative profile.

Conclusion: In addition to confirming that authentic leadership may be studied as a global construct, this study highlights the importance of considering the combinations of global and specific factors in explaining variations in caregivers' need satisfaction, anhedonia, and quality of care over a one year-period. Our findings suggest that managers should strive to implement a complete array of authentic leadership behaviors at a balanced level to ensure positive outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Healthcare Leadership
Journal of Healthcare Leadership HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
2.30%
发文量
27
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Efficient and successful modern healthcare depends on a growing group of professionals working together as an interdisciplinary team. However, many forces shape the delivery of healthcare; changes are being driven by the markets, transformations in concepts of health and wellbeing, technology and research and discovery. Dynamic leadership will guide these necessary transformations. The Journal of Healthcare Leadership is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal focusing on leadership for the healthcare professions. The publication strives to amalgamate current and future healthcare professionals and managers by providing key insights into leadership progress and challenges to improve patient care. The journal aspires to inform key decision makers and those professionals with ambitions of leadership and management; it seeks to connect professionals who are engaged in similar endeavours and to provide wisdom from those working in other industries. Senior and trainee doctors, nurses and allied healthcare professionals, medical students, healthcare managers and allied leaders are invited to contribute to this publication
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信