孕期决策支持方法对分娩硬膜外镇痛的有效性:一项范围综述。

IF 1.5 Q3 NURSING
European Journal of Midwifery Pub Date : 2025-05-30 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.18332/ejm/204274
Yaya Kishimoto, Kayo Ueda, Toshiko Igarashi, Yuu Tanaka, Masahiko Kawaguchi
{"title":"孕期决策支持方法对分娩硬膜外镇痛的有效性:一项范围综述。","authors":"Yaya Kishimoto, Kayo Ueda, Toshiko Igarashi, Yuu Tanaka, Masahiko Kawaguchi","doi":"10.18332/ejm/204274","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This scoping review aimed to identify effective methods used for decision-making support and their effects on women considering choosing epidural analgesia in labor.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A literature search was conducted using CHNAHL, the Web version of the <i>Central Medical Journal</i>, and PubMed, and articles were extracted based on the eligibility criteria in September 2024. The PRISMA-ScR was followed. Studies that compared two groups of women considering epidural anesthesia for labor (subject), decision-making support (intervention), and standard care (control) were eligible.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search identified a total of 732 articles, of which 15 were eligible. Among these, 10 were randomized controlled trials (RCTs), 1 was a non-RCT, and 4 were cohort studies. The most common decision support approach was the distribution of leaflets, which were often given in the second to third trimester of pregnancy. Outcome measurements varied, limiting the identification of the most effective approach. However, most interventions, including controls, showed some effect on improving satisfaction and knowledge. Specifically, interventions incorporating shared decision-making (SDM) influenced satisfaction with the intervention, satisfaction with the birth experience, the feeling of being supported by others, and controlling emotions and attitudes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study found that decision support methods include both expert intervention and media-based approaches. However, given the scarcity of related studies and the variability in evaluation measures, the most effective method could not be identified. Nevertheless, an SDM approach may enhance effectiveness. These findings may help those who support pregnancy and childbirth in choosing more effective decision support methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":32920,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Midwifery","volume":"9 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12124138/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effectiveness of decision-making support methods during pregnancy regarding epidural analgesia in labor: A scoping review.\",\"authors\":\"Yaya Kishimoto, Kayo Ueda, Toshiko Igarashi, Yuu Tanaka, Masahiko Kawaguchi\",\"doi\":\"10.18332/ejm/204274\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This scoping review aimed to identify effective methods used for decision-making support and their effects on women considering choosing epidural analgesia in labor.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A literature search was conducted using CHNAHL, the Web version of the <i>Central Medical Journal</i>, and PubMed, and articles were extracted based on the eligibility criteria in September 2024. The PRISMA-ScR was followed. Studies that compared two groups of women considering epidural anesthesia for labor (subject), decision-making support (intervention), and standard care (control) were eligible.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search identified a total of 732 articles, of which 15 were eligible. Among these, 10 were randomized controlled trials (RCTs), 1 was a non-RCT, and 4 were cohort studies. The most common decision support approach was the distribution of leaflets, which were often given in the second to third trimester of pregnancy. Outcome measurements varied, limiting the identification of the most effective approach. However, most interventions, including controls, showed some effect on improving satisfaction and knowledge. Specifically, interventions incorporating shared decision-making (SDM) influenced satisfaction with the intervention, satisfaction with the birth experience, the feeling of being supported by others, and controlling emotions and attitudes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study found that decision support methods include both expert intervention and media-based approaches. However, given the scarcity of related studies and the variability in evaluation measures, the most effective method could not be identified. Nevertheless, an SDM approach may enhance effectiveness. These findings may help those who support pregnancy and childbirth in choosing more effective decision support methods.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":32920,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Midwifery\",\"volume\":\"9 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12124138/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Midwifery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18332/ejm/204274\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Midwifery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18332/ejm/204274","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言:本综述旨在确定决策支持的有效方法及其对考虑在分娩中选择硬膜外镇痛的妇女的影响。方法:通过CHNAHL、《中央医学杂志》网络版和PubMed进行文献检索,根据入选标准抽取2024年9月的文章。对prism - scr进行了跟踪。比较两组考虑硬膜外麻醉分娩(受试者)、决策支持(干预)和标准护理(对照组)的妇女的研究是合格的。结果:检索到732篇文章,其中15篇符合条件。其中随机对照试验(rct) 10项,非随机对照试验1项,队列研究4项。最常见的决策支持方法是分发传单,通常在怀孕的第二至第三个月发放。结果测量各不相同,限制了最有效方法的确定。然而,大多数干预措施,包括控制,对提高满意度和知识有一定的影响。具体而言,纳入共同决策(SDM)的干预措施影响了对干预措施的满意度、对出生体验的满意度、被他人支持的感觉以及对情绪和态度的控制。结论:本研究发现决策支持方法包括专家干预和基于媒体的方法。然而,由于相关研究的缺乏和评价手段的多变性,无法确定最有效的方法。然而,SDM方法可能会提高有效性。这些发现可能有助于那些支持怀孕和分娩的人选择更有效的决策支持方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The effectiveness of decision-making support methods during pregnancy regarding epidural analgesia in labor: A scoping review.

Introduction: This scoping review aimed to identify effective methods used for decision-making support and their effects on women considering choosing epidural analgesia in labor.

Methods: A literature search was conducted using CHNAHL, the Web version of the Central Medical Journal, and PubMed, and articles were extracted based on the eligibility criteria in September 2024. The PRISMA-ScR was followed. Studies that compared two groups of women considering epidural anesthesia for labor (subject), decision-making support (intervention), and standard care (control) were eligible.

Results: The search identified a total of 732 articles, of which 15 were eligible. Among these, 10 were randomized controlled trials (RCTs), 1 was a non-RCT, and 4 were cohort studies. The most common decision support approach was the distribution of leaflets, which were often given in the second to third trimester of pregnancy. Outcome measurements varied, limiting the identification of the most effective approach. However, most interventions, including controls, showed some effect on improving satisfaction and knowledge. Specifically, interventions incorporating shared decision-making (SDM) influenced satisfaction with the intervention, satisfaction with the birth experience, the feeling of being supported by others, and controlling emotions and attitudes.

Conclusions: This study found that decision support methods include both expert intervention and media-based approaches. However, given the scarcity of related studies and the variability in evaluation measures, the most effective method could not be identified. Nevertheless, an SDM approach may enhance effectiveness. These findings may help those who support pregnancy and childbirth in choosing more effective decision support methods.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Midwifery
European Journal of Midwifery Nursing-Maternity and Midwifery
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
15.80%
发文量
65
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信