Caitlin E Crumm, Robert M DiBlasi, Dwight Barry, Brian Burns, Lori E Rutman, Chih-Hui Tracy Chen, Stephen R Reeves, Joan S Roberts, Russell Migita
{"title":"振动网状雾化器在儿科急诊科的回顾性观察研究。","authors":"Caitlin E Crumm, Robert M DiBlasi, Dwight Barry, Brian Burns, Lori E Rutman, Chih-Hui Tracy Chen, Stephen R Reeves, Joan S Roberts, Russell Migita","doi":"10.1097/PEC.0000000000003372","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine outcomes of bronchodilator delivery with a vibrating mesh nebulizer (VMN) in a pediatric emergency department (ED).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed an in vitro analysis of the VMN and a retrospective observational study of patients receiving nebulized albuterol for a respiratory indication before (April 24, 2022-August 11, 2022) and after (April 24, 2023-July 29, 2023) introduction of the VMN in the ED.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six hundred five children ages 1 to 17 years were included (302 preintervention, 303 postintervention). The adjusted total albuterol dose per patient was less in the postintervention group (-15.8 mg; 95% CI: -17.5 mg, -14.2 mg). The adjusted time to disposition was less post-intervention (-36 min; 95% CI: -51, -20). The adjusted odds of admission to the hospital or if admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) were not statistically different [admission adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 1.1; 95% CI: 0.7, 1.7; ICU admission if admitted aOR: 1.7; 95% CI: 0.7, 4.3]. Adjusted mean change in respiratory score with first nebulizer was similar (-0.2; 95% CI: -0.6, 0.3). Within 72 hours of disposition, odds of unplanned transfer to the ICU after admission were similar (aOR: 0.4; 95% CI: 0.1, 1.6), as was unplanned ED return after discharge (aOR: 0.7; 95% CI: 0.3, 1.9).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>VMN use in the pediatric ED was associated with a lower total albuterol dose per patient as well as a shorter time to disposition. It did not change the odds of admission, admission to the ICU, unplanned transfers to the ICU after admission, or returns to the ER within 72 hours of discharge.</p>","PeriodicalId":19996,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric emergency care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Retrospective Observational Study of Vibrating Mesh Nebulizers in the Pediatric Emergency Department.\",\"authors\":\"Caitlin E Crumm, Robert M DiBlasi, Dwight Barry, Brian Burns, Lori E Rutman, Chih-Hui Tracy Chen, Stephen R Reeves, Joan S Roberts, Russell Migita\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/PEC.0000000000003372\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine outcomes of bronchodilator delivery with a vibrating mesh nebulizer (VMN) in a pediatric emergency department (ED).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed an in vitro analysis of the VMN and a retrospective observational study of patients receiving nebulized albuterol for a respiratory indication before (April 24, 2022-August 11, 2022) and after (April 24, 2023-July 29, 2023) introduction of the VMN in the ED.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six hundred five children ages 1 to 17 years were included (302 preintervention, 303 postintervention). The adjusted total albuterol dose per patient was less in the postintervention group (-15.8 mg; 95% CI: -17.5 mg, -14.2 mg). The adjusted time to disposition was less post-intervention (-36 min; 95% CI: -51, -20). The adjusted odds of admission to the hospital or if admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) were not statistically different [admission adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 1.1; 95% CI: 0.7, 1.7; ICU admission if admitted aOR: 1.7; 95% CI: 0.7, 4.3]. Adjusted mean change in respiratory score with first nebulizer was similar (-0.2; 95% CI: -0.6, 0.3). Within 72 hours of disposition, odds of unplanned transfer to the ICU after admission were similar (aOR: 0.4; 95% CI: 0.1, 1.6), as was unplanned ED return after discharge (aOR: 0.7; 95% CI: 0.3, 1.9).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>VMN use in the pediatric ED was associated with a lower total albuterol dose per patient as well as a shorter time to disposition. It did not change the odds of admission, admission to the ICU, unplanned transfers to the ICU after admission, or returns to the ER within 72 hours of discharge.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19996,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pediatric emergency care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pediatric emergency care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/PEC.0000000000003372\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric emergency care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PEC.0000000000003372","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
A Retrospective Observational Study of Vibrating Mesh Nebulizers in the Pediatric Emergency Department.
Objective: To determine outcomes of bronchodilator delivery with a vibrating mesh nebulizer (VMN) in a pediatric emergency department (ED).
Methods: We performed an in vitro analysis of the VMN and a retrospective observational study of patients receiving nebulized albuterol for a respiratory indication before (April 24, 2022-August 11, 2022) and after (April 24, 2023-July 29, 2023) introduction of the VMN in the ED.
Results: Six hundred five children ages 1 to 17 years were included (302 preintervention, 303 postintervention). The adjusted total albuterol dose per patient was less in the postintervention group (-15.8 mg; 95% CI: -17.5 mg, -14.2 mg). The adjusted time to disposition was less post-intervention (-36 min; 95% CI: -51, -20). The adjusted odds of admission to the hospital or if admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) were not statistically different [admission adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 1.1; 95% CI: 0.7, 1.7; ICU admission if admitted aOR: 1.7; 95% CI: 0.7, 4.3]. Adjusted mean change in respiratory score with first nebulizer was similar (-0.2; 95% CI: -0.6, 0.3). Within 72 hours of disposition, odds of unplanned transfer to the ICU after admission were similar (aOR: 0.4; 95% CI: 0.1, 1.6), as was unplanned ED return after discharge (aOR: 0.7; 95% CI: 0.3, 1.9).
Conclusions: VMN use in the pediatric ED was associated with a lower total albuterol dose per patient as well as a shorter time to disposition. It did not change the odds of admission, admission to the ICU, unplanned transfers to the ICU after admission, or returns to the ER within 72 hours of discharge.
期刊介绍:
Pediatric Emergency Care®, features clinically relevant original articles with an EM perspective on the care of acutely ill or injured children and adolescents. The journal is aimed at both the pediatrician who wants to know more about treating and being compensated for minor emergency cases and the emergency physicians who must treat children or adolescents in more than one case in there.