测量重症肌无力的不良事件负担:重症肌无力患者胸腺切除术不良事件单元随机试验的回顾性验证。

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Muscle & Nerve Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-02 DOI:10.1002/mus.28447
Michael K Hehir, Inmaculada B Aban, Henry J Kaminski
{"title":"测量重症肌无力的不良事件负担:重症肌无力患者胸腺切除术不良事件单元随机试验的回顾性验证。","authors":"Michael K Hehir, Inmaculada B Aban, Henry J Kaminski","doi":"10.1002/mus.28447","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction/aims: </strong>The Adverse Event Unit (AEU) is a patient and physician weighted unit that quantifies and compares adverse event (AE) burden among any neurologic treatments. A recent study demonstrated feasibility and preliminary validity of the AEU in myasthenia gravis (MG). This study evaluated feasibility of assigning AEU scores retrospectively from pre-existing data in the randomized clinical trial of thymectomy in MG (MGTX) and quantifying AE burden differences in participants.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Serious and non-serious AE were recorded at MGTX visits. AEU scores were assigned by matching MGTX AE to AEU categories. Total AEU score for each participant was compared to the prednisone dosage area under the curve for years 1, 2, and 3. We also compared differences in AEU scores between participants treated with prednisone and azathioprine versus those treated with prednisone alone.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All 117 MGTX patients received prednisone; 32% also received azathioprine. A weak correlation between increasing prednisone exposure and total AEU score was observed at year 2 (r = 0.19, p = 0.04) and year 3 (r = 0.23, p = 0.01). Participants treated with azathioprine in addition to prednisone had higher AEU scores than patients treated with prednisone alone at years 1 (median AEU 19 vs. 5, p = 0.037), 2 (median AEU 23 vs. 6, p = 0.018), and 3 (median AEU 34 vs. 9, p = 0.006).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Pre-existing clinical trial data can be translated into AEU scores. MG patients treated with multiple immunosuppressants had the highest AEU scores, similar to our prospective trial. Future studies will compare the side effect burden of MG treatments and define clinically meaningful AEU scores.</p>","PeriodicalId":18968,"journal":{"name":"Muscle & Nerve","volume":" ","pages":"313-320"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measuring Adverse Event Burden in Myasthenia Gravis: Retrospective Validation of the Adverse Event Unit With Randomized Trial of Thymectomy in Myasthenia Gravis Data.\",\"authors\":\"Michael K Hehir, Inmaculada B Aban, Henry J Kaminski\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/mus.28447\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction/aims: </strong>The Adverse Event Unit (AEU) is a patient and physician weighted unit that quantifies and compares adverse event (AE) burden among any neurologic treatments. A recent study demonstrated feasibility and preliminary validity of the AEU in myasthenia gravis (MG). This study evaluated feasibility of assigning AEU scores retrospectively from pre-existing data in the randomized clinical trial of thymectomy in MG (MGTX) and quantifying AE burden differences in participants.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Serious and non-serious AE were recorded at MGTX visits. AEU scores were assigned by matching MGTX AE to AEU categories. Total AEU score for each participant was compared to the prednisone dosage area under the curve for years 1, 2, and 3. We also compared differences in AEU scores between participants treated with prednisone and azathioprine versus those treated with prednisone alone.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All 117 MGTX patients received prednisone; 32% also received azathioprine. A weak correlation between increasing prednisone exposure and total AEU score was observed at year 2 (r = 0.19, p = 0.04) and year 3 (r = 0.23, p = 0.01). Participants treated with azathioprine in addition to prednisone had higher AEU scores than patients treated with prednisone alone at years 1 (median AEU 19 vs. 5, p = 0.037), 2 (median AEU 23 vs. 6, p = 0.018), and 3 (median AEU 34 vs. 9, p = 0.006).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Pre-existing clinical trial data can be translated into AEU scores. MG patients treated with multiple immunosuppressants had the highest AEU scores, similar to our prospective trial. Future studies will compare the side effect burden of MG treatments and define clinically meaningful AEU scores.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18968,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Muscle & Nerve\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"313-320\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Muscle & Nerve\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.28447\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Muscle & Nerve","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.28447","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介/目的:不良事件单位(AEU)是一个患者和医生加权单位,用于量化和比较任何神经系统治疗中的不良事件(AE)负担。最近的一项研究证实了AEU在重症肌无力(MG)中的可行性和初步有效性。本研究评估了根据胸腺切除术(MGTX)随机临床试验中已有的数据回顾性分配AEU评分的可行性,并量化了参与者的AE负担差异。方法:在MGTX就诊时记录严重AE和非严重AE。通过将MGTX AE与AEU类别相匹配来分配AEU分数。将每个参与者的AEU总评分与第1、2和3年的强的松剂量面积进行比较。我们还比较了接受强的松和硫唑嘌呤治疗的参与者与单独接受强的松治疗的参与者之间AEU评分的差异。结果:117例MGTX患者均接受强的松治疗;32%的患者还接受了硫唑嘌呤治疗。在第2年(r = 0.19, p = 0.04)和第3年(r = 0.23, p = 0.01),泼尼松暴露增加与AEU总评分之间存在弱相关性。在第1年(AEU中值19比5,p = 0.037)、第2年(AEU中值23比6,p = 0.018)和第3年(AEU中值34比9,p = 0.006),接受硫唑嘌呤和泼尼松联合治疗的患者的AEU评分高于单独接受泼尼松治疗的患者。讨论:预先存在的临床试验数据可以转化为AEU评分。接受多种免疫抑制剂治疗的MG患者AEU评分最高,与我们的前瞻性试验相似。未来的研究将比较MG治疗的副作用负担,并定义有临床意义的AEU评分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Measuring Adverse Event Burden in Myasthenia Gravis: Retrospective Validation of the Adverse Event Unit With Randomized Trial of Thymectomy in Myasthenia Gravis Data.

Introduction/aims: The Adverse Event Unit (AEU) is a patient and physician weighted unit that quantifies and compares adverse event (AE) burden among any neurologic treatments. A recent study demonstrated feasibility and preliminary validity of the AEU in myasthenia gravis (MG). This study evaluated feasibility of assigning AEU scores retrospectively from pre-existing data in the randomized clinical trial of thymectomy in MG (MGTX) and quantifying AE burden differences in participants.

Methods: Serious and non-serious AE were recorded at MGTX visits. AEU scores were assigned by matching MGTX AE to AEU categories. Total AEU score for each participant was compared to the prednisone dosage area under the curve for years 1, 2, and 3. We also compared differences in AEU scores between participants treated with prednisone and azathioprine versus those treated with prednisone alone.

Results: All 117 MGTX patients received prednisone; 32% also received azathioprine. A weak correlation between increasing prednisone exposure and total AEU score was observed at year 2 (r = 0.19, p = 0.04) and year 3 (r = 0.23, p = 0.01). Participants treated with azathioprine in addition to prednisone had higher AEU scores than patients treated with prednisone alone at years 1 (median AEU 19 vs. 5, p = 0.037), 2 (median AEU 23 vs. 6, p = 0.018), and 3 (median AEU 34 vs. 9, p = 0.006).

Discussion: Pre-existing clinical trial data can be translated into AEU scores. MG patients treated with multiple immunosuppressants had the highest AEU scores, similar to our prospective trial. Future studies will compare the side effect burden of MG treatments and define clinically meaningful AEU scores.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Muscle & Nerve
Muscle & Nerve 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
287
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Muscle & Nerve is an international and interdisciplinary publication of original contributions, in both health and disease, concerning studies of the muscle, the neuromuscular junction, the peripheral motor, sensory and autonomic neurons, and the central nervous system where the behavior of the peripheral nervous system is clarified. Appearing monthly, Muscle & Nerve publishes clinical studies and clinically relevant research reports in the fields of anatomy, biochemistry, cell biology, electrophysiology and electrodiagnosis, epidemiology, genetics, immunology, pathology, pharmacology, physiology, toxicology, and virology. The Journal welcomes articles and reports on basic clinical electrophysiology and electrodiagnosis. We expedite some papers dealing with timely topics to keep up with the fast-moving pace of science, based on the referees'' recommendation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信