细菌与真核宿主相互作用中带注释的smorf编码多肽研究进展。

IF 3.9 4区 生物学 Q2 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Proteomics Pub Date : 2025-06-02 DOI:10.1002/pmic.202400464
Gonzalo Zapata, Ezequiel G. Mogro, Abril L. Pagnutti, Macarena Algañaras, Pilar Cañameras, Walter O. Draghi, Antonio Lagares, Daniela Bottero, Mauricio J. Lozano
{"title":"细菌与真核宿主相互作用中带注释的smorf编码多肽研究进展。","authors":"Gonzalo Zapata,&nbsp;Ezequiel G. Mogro,&nbsp;Abril L. Pagnutti,&nbsp;Macarena Algañaras,&nbsp;Pilar Cañameras,&nbsp;Walter O. Draghi,&nbsp;Antonio Lagares,&nbsp;Daniela Bottero,&nbsp;Mauricio J. Lozano","doi":"10.1002/pmic.202400464","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>smORF encoded polypeptides (SEPs) are difficult to predict due to their small size. While modern genome annotation tools are capable of identifying smORFs, their reliability is often uncertain. Furthermore, experimental validation of smORFs has primarily focused on a limited set of model organisms. Here, we conduct a comprehensive analysis of annotated smORFs in a diverse range of bacteria interacting with eukaryotic hosts. Our analysis revealed that bacterial genomes typically harbor between 100 and 300 annotated smORFs, predominantly encoding SEPs exceeding 40 residues and annotated as hypothetical proteins. We show that functional annotation of SEPs can be improved to some extent with the currently available resources, and that SEPs exhibit distinct functional profiles in bacteria associated with different host types (plant vs. animal). We also found that most of the experimentally validated SEPs are conserved and that all the annotated SEPs begin with methionine, although that is not always the case for the experimentally validated ones. Our findings underscore the need for improved annotation methods and further experimental characterization to fully understand the functional roles and evolutionary significance of smORFs in bacteria-host interactions.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":224,"journal":{"name":"Proteomics","volume":"25 13","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Survey of Annotated smORF-Encoded Polypeptides in Bacteria Interacting With Eukaryotic Hosts\",\"authors\":\"Gonzalo Zapata,&nbsp;Ezequiel G. Mogro,&nbsp;Abril L. Pagnutti,&nbsp;Macarena Algañaras,&nbsp;Pilar Cañameras,&nbsp;Walter O. Draghi,&nbsp;Antonio Lagares,&nbsp;Daniela Bottero,&nbsp;Mauricio J. Lozano\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/pmic.202400464\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>smORF encoded polypeptides (SEPs) are difficult to predict due to their small size. While modern genome annotation tools are capable of identifying smORFs, their reliability is often uncertain. Furthermore, experimental validation of smORFs has primarily focused on a limited set of model organisms. Here, we conduct a comprehensive analysis of annotated smORFs in a diverse range of bacteria interacting with eukaryotic hosts. Our analysis revealed that bacterial genomes typically harbor between 100 and 300 annotated smORFs, predominantly encoding SEPs exceeding 40 residues and annotated as hypothetical proteins. We show that functional annotation of SEPs can be improved to some extent with the currently available resources, and that SEPs exhibit distinct functional profiles in bacteria associated with different host types (plant vs. animal). We also found that most of the experimentally validated SEPs are conserved and that all the annotated SEPs begin with methionine, although that is not always the case for the experimentally validated ones. Our findings underscore the need for improved annotation methods and further experimental characterization to fully understand the functional roles and evolutionary significance of smORFs in bacteria-host interactions.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":224,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proteomics\",\"volume\":\"25 13\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proteomics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://analyticalsciencejournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/pmic.202400464\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proteomics","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://analyticalsciencejournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/pmic.202400464","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

smORF编码的多肽(SEPs)由于其体积小而难以预测。虽然现代基因组注释工具能够识别smorf,但它们的可靠性往往是不确定的。此外,smorf的实验验证主要集中在一组有限的模式生物上。在这里,我们对与真核宿主相互作用的多种细菌中带注释的smorf进行了全面分析。我们的分析显示,细菌基因组通常含有100到300个带注释的smorf,主要编码超过40个残基的sep,并被注释为假设的蛋白质。我们发现,利用现有资源,sep的功能注释可以在一定程度上得到改进,并且sep在不同寄主类型(植物与动物)相关的细菌中表现出不同的功能特征。我们还发现大多数实验验证的sep都是保守的,并且所有注释的sep都以蛋氨酸开头,尽管实验验证的sep并不总是如此。我们的发现强调需要改进注释方法和进一步的实验表征,以充分了解smorf在细菌-宿主相互作用中的功能作用和进化意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

A Survey of Annotated smORF-Encoded Polypeptides in Bacteria Interacting With Eukaryotic Hosts

A Survey of Annotated smORF-Encoded Polypeptides in Bacteria Interacting With Eukaryotic Hosts

A Survey of Annotated smORF-Encoded Polypeptides in Bacteria Interacting With Eukaryotic Hosts

A Survey of Annotated smORF-Encoded Polypeptides in Bacteria Interacting With Eukaryotic Hosts

smORF encoded polypeptides (SEPs) are difficult to predict due to their small size. While modern genome annotation tools are capable of identifying smORFs, their reliability is often uncertain. Furthermore, experimental validation of smORFs has primarily focused on a limited set of model organisms. Here, we conduct a comprehensive analysis of annotated smORFs in a diverse range of bacteria interacting with eukaryotic hosts. Our analysis revealed that bacterial genomes typically harbor between 100 and 300 annotated smORFs, predominantly encoding SEPs exceeding 40 residues and annotated as hypothetical proteins. We show that functional annotation of SEPs can be improved to some extent with the currently available resources, and that SEPs exhibit distinct functional profiles in bacteria associated with different host types (plant vs. animal). We also found that most of the experimentally validated SEPs are conserved and that all the annotated SEPs begin with methionine, although that is not always the case for the experimentally validated ones. Our findings underscore the need for improved annotation methods and further experimental characterization to fully understand the functional roles and evolutionary significance of smORFs in bacteria-host interactions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Proteomics
Proteomics 生物-生化研究方法
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
5.90%
发文量
193
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: PROTEOMICS is the premier international source for information on all aspects of applications and technologies, including software, in proteomics and other "omics". The journal includes but is not limited to proteomics, genomics, transcriptomics, metabolomics and lipidomics, and systems biology approaches. Papers describing novel applications of proteomics and integration of multi-omics data and approaches are especially welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信