Elise D. Snyder, Jennifer L. Tank, Abagael N. Pruitt, Brett Peters, Pedro F. P. Brandão-Dias, E. M. Curtis, Kyle Bibby, Arial J. Shogren, Diogo Bolster, Scott P. Egan, Gary A. Lamberti
{"title":"变暖增加了流动水体中环境DNA (eDNA)的去除率","authors":"Elise D. Snyder, Jennifer L. Tank, Abagael N. Pruitt, Brett Peters, Pedro F. P. Brandão-Dias, E. M. Curtis, Kyle Bibby, Arial J. Shogren, Diogo Bolster, Scott P. Egan, Gary A. Lamberti","doi":"10.1002/edn3.70094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The use of environmental DNA (eDNA) for aquatic conservation is emerging, but its value is limited by our understanding of how environmental factors like temperature impact eDNA persistence. Although elevated temperatures are known to increase eDNA decay in lakes and ponds, no studies have experimentally explored the effect of temperature on eDNA fate in flowing waters where physical removal could obscure the effect of temperature on decay rates. We compared eDNA removal rates in <i>n</i> = 12 indoor, recirculating mesocosms under varying water temperatures (20°C, 23°C, 26°C) and found that, for small eDNA particles (0.2–1.0 μm), removal rates were higher at the warmest temperature (Tukey's post hoc, <i>p</i> ≤ 0.03) while removal rates were consistent across temperatures for larger eDNA particles (> 1.0 μm, Tukey's, <i>p</i> > 0.05). Consequently, smaller eDNA particles were removed faster than larger particles at 26°C and 23°C (Tukey's, <i>p</i> < 0.001) compared to 20°C (Tukey's, <i>p</i> = 0.01), resulting in an increase in the proportion of the eDNA sample made up of small particles with downstream transport for the two warmer temperatures (beta linear model, <i>p</i> < 0.001). This suggests eDNA removal in streams reflects a complex interplay between physical trapping and microbial degradation influenced by temperature. Consequently, differences in temperature between geographic locations, seasons, and climates could impact the fate and interpretation of eDNA, even in flowing waters where physical removal contributes substantially to eDNA fate.</p>","PeriodicalId":52828,"journal":{"name":"Environmental DNA","volume":"7 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/edn3.70094","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Warming Increases Environmental DNA (eDNA) Removal Rates in Flowing Waters\",\"authors\":\"Elise D. Snyder, Jennifer L. Tank, Abagael N. Pruitt, Brett Peters, Pedro F. P. Brandão-Dias, E. M. Curtis, Kyle Bibby, Arial J. Shogren, Diogo Bolster, Scott P. Egan, Gary A. Lamberti\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/edn3.70094\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The use of environmental DNA (eDNA) for aquatic conservation is emerging, but its value is limited by our understanding of how environmental factors like temperature impact eDNA persistence. Although elevated temperatures are known to increase eDNA decay in lakes and ponds, no studies have experimentally explored the effect of temperature on eDNA fate in flowing waters where physical removal could obscure the effect of temperature on decay rates. We compared eDNA removal rates in <i>n</i> = 12 indoor, recirculating mesocosms under varying water temperatures (20°C, 23°C, 26°C) and found that, for small eDNA particles (0.2–1.0 μm), removal rates were higher at the warmest temperature (Tukey's post hoc, <i>p</i> ≤ 0.03) while removal rates were consistent across temperatures for larger eDNA particles (> 1.0 μm, Tukey's, <i>p</i> > 0.05). Consequently, smaller eDNA particles were removed faster than larger particles at 26°C and 23°C (Tukey's, <i>p</i> < 0.001) compared to 20°C (Tukey's, <i>p</i> = 0.01), resulting in an increase in the proportion of the eDNA sample made up of small particles with downstream transport for the two warmer temperatures (beta linear model, <i>p</i> < 0.001). This suggests eDNA removal in streams reflects a complex interplay between physical trapping and microbial degradation influenced by temperature. Consequently, differences in temperature between geographic locations, seasons, and climates could impact the fate and interpretation of eDNA, even in flowing waters where physical removal contributes substantially to eDNA fate.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":52828,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental DNA\",\"volume\":\"7 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/edn3.70094\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental DNA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/edn3.70094\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Agricultural and Biological Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental DNA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/edn3.70094","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
环境DNA (environmental DNA, eDNA)在水生生物保护中的应用正在兴起,但其价值受到我们对温度等环境因素如何影响eDNA持久性的理解的限制。虽然已知升高的温度会增加湖泊和池塘中eDNA的衰变,但没有实验研究探索温度对流动水中eDNA命运的影响,因为物理去除可能会掩盖温度对衰变率的影响。我们比较了不同水温(20°C, 23°C, 26°C)下n = 12个室内循环中生态系统的eDNA去除率,发现对于小eDNA颗粒(0.2-1.0 μm),在最温暖的温度下去除率较高(Tukey’s post hoc, p≤0.03),而对于较大的eDNA颗粒(> 1.0 μm, Tukey’s, p > 0.05),去除率在不同温度下一致。因此,与20°C (Tukey's, p = 0.01)相比,在26°C和23°C (Tukey's, p < 0.001)下,较小的eDNA颗粒比较大的eDNA颗粒被去除得更快,导致由小颗粒组成的eDNA样品在两个较暖的温度下下游运输的比例增加(β线性模型,p < 0.001)。这表明溪流中的eDNA去除反映了物理捕获和受温度影响的微生物降解之间复杂的相互作用。因此,地理位置、季节和气候之间的温度差异可能会影响eDNA的命运和解释,即使在物理去除对eDNA命运有很大贡献的流动水中也是如此。
Warming Increases Environmental DNA (eDNA) Removal Rates in Flowing Waters
The use of environmental DNA (eDNA) for aquatic conservation is emerging, but its value is limited by our understanding of how environmental factors like temperature impact eDNA persistence. Although elevated temperatures are known to increase eDNA decay in lakes and ponds, no studies have experimentally explored the effect of temperature on eDNA fate in flowing waters where physical removal could obscure the effect of temperature on decay rates. We compared eDNA removal rates in n = 12 indoor, recirculating mesocosms under varying water temperatures (20°C, 23°C, 26°C) and found that, for small eDNA particles (0.2–1.0 μm), removal rates were higher at the warmest temperature (Tukey's post hoc, p ≤ 0.03) while removal rates were consistent across temperatures for larger eDNA particles (> 1.0 μm, Tukey's, p > 0.05). Consequently, smaller eDNA particles were removed faster than larger particles at 26°C and 23°C (Tukey's, p < 0.001) compared to 20°C (Tukey's, p = 0.01), resulting in an increase in the proportion of the eDNA sample made up of small particles with downstream transport for the two warmer temperatures (beta linear model, p < 0.001). This suggests eDNA removal in streams reflects a complex interplay between physical trapping and microbial degradation influenced by temperature. Consequently, differences in temperature between geographic locations, seasons, and climates could impact the fate and interpretation of eDNA, even in flowing waters where physical removal contributes substantially to eDNA fate.