评估过程的管理和认证度量的创建:基于人工智能的融合框架

IF 6.9 1区 管理学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Dragan Korać , Boris Damjanović , Dejan Simić , Cong Pu
{"title":"评估过程的管理和认证度量的创建:基于人工智能的融合框架","authors":"Dragan Korać ,&nbsp;Boris Damjanović ,&nbsp;Dejan Simić ,&nbsp;Cong Pu","doi":"10.1016/j.ipm.2025.104233","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>While the literature extensively covers various authentication systems, management of evaluation processes and creation of authentication metrics remain significant information challenges for researchers. To overcome this complex challenge, we present a taxonomy of research processes based on fusion and fuzzy strategies and give an overview and comparison of related studies. Specifically, we develop an artificial intelligence-based fusion framework (<em>f<sub>f</sub></em>) incorporating Mamdani-type fuzzy rules and key user factors: security, privacy, and trust. Its uniqueness and innovation lie in the application of trapezoidal functions to describe these factors as key input metric values. Moreover, we are the first to incorporate trust as an independent comparative factor and provide a comparison of traditional and modern authentication methods, including artificial intelligence (AI), electroencephalogram (EEG), electrocardiographic (ECG), and photoplethysmogram (PPG) methods. Also, we use a workflow diagram to define the topological relationships among user factors and authentication factors, clarifying the role of fusion in multi-factor authentication (MFA) approaches. In comparison to other similar frameworks implemented solely for traditional methods, the proposed <em>f<sub>f</sub></em> yields better and more realistic quantification metric results. In addition, we present and discuss the key mathematical differences between one-factor authentication (1FA) and MFA, aiming to shed light on issues such as complexity and bias. Lastly, the developed <em>f<sub>f</sub></em> not only advances MFA metrics by introducing modern authentication methods such as AI, EEG, ECG, and PPG but also paves the way for future research on how and why AI algorithms need to be incorporated into information processing and the creation of strong MFA solutions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50365,"journal":{"name":"Information Processing & Management","volume":"62 6","pages":"Article 104233"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Management of evaluation processes and creation of authentication metrics: Artificial intelligence-based fusion framework\",\"authors\":\"Dragan Korać ,&nbsp;Boris Damjanović ,&nbsp;Dejan Simić ,&nbsp;Cong Pu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ipm.2025.104233\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>While the literature extensively covers various authentication systems, management of evaluation processes and creation of authentication metrics remain significant information challenges for researchers. To overcome this complex challenge, we present a taxonomy of research processes based on fusion and fuzzy strategies and give an overview and comparison of related studies. Specifically, we develop an artificial intelligence-based fusion framework (<em>f<sub>f</sub></em>) incorporating Mamdani-type fuzzy rules and key user factors: security, privacy, and trust. Its uniqueness and innovation lie in the application of trapezoidal functions to describe these factors as key input metric values. Moreover, we are the first to incorporate trust as an independent comparative factor and provide a comparison of traditional and modern authentication methods, including artificial intelligence (AI), electroencephalogram (EEG), electrocardiographic (ECG), and photoplethysmogram (PPG) methods. Also, we use a workflow diagram to define the topological relationships among user factors and authentication factors, clarifying the role of fusion in multi-factor authentication (MFA) approaches. In comparison to other similar frameworks implemented solely for traditional methods, the proposed <em>f<sub>f</sub></em> yields better and more realistic quantification metric results. In addition, we present and discuss the key mathematical differences between one-factor authentication (1FA) and MFA, aiming to shed light on issues such as complexity and bias. Lastly, the developed <em>f<sub>f</sub></em> not only advances MFA metrics by introducing modern authentication methods such as AI, EEG, ECG, and PPG but also paves the way for future research on how and why AI algorithms need to be incorporated into information processing and the creation of strong MFA solutions.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50365,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Information Processing & Management\",\"volume\":\"62 6\",\"pages\":\"Article 104233\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Information Processing & Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306457325001748\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information Processing & Management","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306457325001748","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然文献广泛涵盖了各种认证系统,但评估过程的管理和认证度量的创建仍然是研究人员面临的重大信息挑战。为了克服这一复杂的挑战,我们提出了基于融合和模糊策略的研究过程分类,并对相关研究进行了概述和比较。具体来说,我们开发了一个基于人工智能的融合框架(ff),结合了mamdani型模糊规则和关键用户因素:安全、隐私和信任。它的独特之处在于应用梯形函数将这些因素描述为关键输入度量值。此外,我们是第一个将信任作为一个独立的比较因素,并提供传统和现代认证方法的比较,包括人工智能(AI),脑电图(EEG),心电图(ECG)和光电容积描记图(PPG)方法。此外,我们使用工作流图来定义用户因素和认证因素之间的拓扑关系,阐明融合在多因素认证(MFA)方法中的作用。与仅针对传统方法实现的其他类似框架相比,所提出的ff可以产生更好和更现实的量化度量结果。此外,我们提出并讨论了单因素认证(1FA)和MFA之间的关键数学差异,旨在阐明复杂性和偏差等问题。最后,开发的ff不仅通过引入现代认证方法(如AI, EEG, ECG和PPG)来推进MFA指标,而且还为未来研究如何以及为什么需要将AI算法纳入信息处理和创建强大的MFA解决方案铺平了道路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Management of evaluation processes and creation of authentication metrics: Artificial intelligence-based fusion framework
While the literature extensively covers various authentication systems, management of evaluation processes and creation of authentication metrics remain significant information challenges for researchers. To overcome this complex challenge, we present a taxonomy of research processes based on fusion and fuzzy strategies and give an overview and comparison of related studies. Specifically, we develop an artificial intelligence-based fusion framework (ff) incorporating Mamdani-type fuzzy rules and key user factors: security, privacy, and trust. Its uniqueness and innovation lie in the application of trapezoidal functions to describe these factors as key input metric values. Moreover, we are the first to incorporate trust as an independent comparative factor and provide a comparison of traditional and modern authentication methods, including artificial intelligence (AI), electroencephalogram (EEG), electrocardiographic (ECG), and photoplethysmogram (PPG) methods. Also, we use a workflow diagram to define the topological relationships among user factors and authentication factors, clarifying the role of fusion in multi-factor authentication (MFA) approaches. In comparison to other similar frameworks implemented solely for traditional methods, the proposed ff yields better and more realistic quantification metric results. In addition, we present and discuss the key mathematical differences between one-factor authentication (1FA) and MFA, aiming to shed light on issues such as complexity and bias. Lastly, the developed ff not only advances MFA metrics by introducing modern authentication methods such as AI, EEG, ECG, and PPG but also paves the way for future research on how and why AI algorithms need to be incorporated into information processing and the creation of strong MFA solutions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Information Processing & Management
Information Processing & Management 工程技术-计算机:信息系统
CiteScore
17.00
自引率
11.60%
发文量
276
审稿时长
39 days
期刊介绍: Information Processing and Management is dedicated to publishing cutting-edge original research at the convergence of computing and information science. Our scope encompasses theory, methods, and applications across various domains, including advertising, business, health, information science, information technology marketing, and social computing. We aim to cater to the interests of both primary researchers and practitioners by offering an effective platform for the timely dissemination of advanced and topical issues in this interdisciplinary field. The journal places particular emphasis on original research articles, research survey articles, research method articles, and articles addressing critical applications of research. Join us in advancing knowledge and innovation at the intersection of computing and information science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信