基于高速成像和机器学习方法的硬质合金和钢激光焊接焊缝质量预测

IF 3.8 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Mohammadhossein Norouzian , Mahan Khakpour , Marko Orosnjak , Atal Anil Kumar , Slawomir Kedziora
{"title":"基于高速成像和机器学习方法的硬质合金和钢激光焊接焊缝质量预测","authors":"Mohammadhossein Norouzian ,&nbsp;Mahan Khakpour ,&nbsp;Marko Orosnjak ,&nbsp;Atal Anil Kumar ,&nbsp;Slawomir Kedziora","doi":"10.1016/j.jajp.2025.100318","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Laser welding of steel and hardmetal presents significant challenges due to their differing material properties. Improper laser welding parameters can result in unstable joints, ultimately leading to reduced mechanical strength of the weld. Therefore, defining an optimal process window is critical to ensuring weld quality. In addition, a continuous process monitoring method like High-Speed Imaging (HSI) is essential in real industrial applications to maintain stability and detect potential defects. Understanding plume dynamics helps identify the most important features of weld quality, but it also provides deeper insight into operational parameters that discriminate different weld types. Analysis of individual image plume frames from HSI reveals distinct statistical features that are identified as unique to each welding condition. Performing systematic feature selection using plume morphology, spatter generation and weld quality, we achieved&gt;95 % leveraging Machine Learning (ML) classifiers. Particularly, Gradient Boosting Classifier (GBC), Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA), Multinomial Logistic Regression (MNL-LR), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Random Forest (RF), where the RF obtained &gt;99 % classification accuracy of weld quality. The RF was then used in performing Recursive Feature Elimination (RFE), and with the robustness analysis, we managed to reduce the number of features from forty-nine to nine features while maintaining satisfactory performance (Accuracy = 0.981, F1-score = 0.961, AUROC = 0.997). The position of the weld plume, plume eccentricity and plume width are the most essential features that lead to the improvement of node purity and classification accuracy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34313,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advanced Joining Processes","volume":"11 ","pages":"Article 100318"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prediction of weld quality in laser welding of hardmetal and steel using high-speed imaging and machine learning methods\",\"authors\":\"Mohammadhossein Norouzian ,&nbsp;Mahan Khakpour ,&nbsp;Marko Orosnjak ,&nbsp;Atal Anil Kumar ,&nbsp;Slawomir Kedziora\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jajp.2025.100318\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Laser welding of steel and hardmetal presents significant challenges due to their differing material properties. Improper laser welding parameters can result in unstable joints, ultimately leading to reduced mechanical strength of the weld. Therefore, defining an optimal process window is critical to ensuring weld quality. In addition, a continuous process monitoring method like High-Speed Imaging (HSI) is essential in real industrial applications to maintain stability and detect potential defects. Understanding plume dynamics helps identify the most important features of weld quality, but it also provides deeper insight into operational parameters that discriminate different weld types. Analysis of individual image plume frames from HSI reveals distinct statistical features that are identified as unique to each welding condition. Performing systematic feature selection using plume morphology, spatter generation and weld quality, we achieved&gt;95 % leveraging Machine Learning (ML) classifiers. Particularly, Gradient Boosting Classifier (GBC), Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA), Multinomial Logistic Regression (MNL-LR), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Random Forest (RF), where the RF obtained &gt;99 % classification accuracy of weld quality. The RF was then used in performing Recursive Feature Elimination (RFE), and with the robustness analysis, we managed to reduce the number of features from forty-nine to nine features while maintaining satisfactory performance (Accuracy = 0.981, F1-score = 0.961, AUROC = 0.997). The position of the weld plume, plume eccentricity and plume width are the most essential features that lead to the improvement of node purity and classification accuracy.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34313,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Advanced Joining Processes\",\"volume\":\"11 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100318\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Advanced Joining Processes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666330925000391\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advanced Joining Processes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666330925000391","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

钢和硬质合金的激光焊接由于其不同的材料特性而面临着巨大的挑战。不当的激光焊接参数会导致接头不稳定,最终导致焊缝机械强度降低。因此,确定最佳工艺窗口对于确保焊接质量至关重要。此外,在实际工业应用中,像高速成像(HSI)这样的连续过程监控方法对于保持稳定性和检测潜在缺陷至关重要。了解羽流动力学有助于确定焊接质量的最重要特征,同时也有助于更深入地了解区分不同焊接类型的操作参数。对HSI中单个图像羽流帧的分析揭示了不同的统计特征,这些特征被认为是每个焊接条件所独有的。利用羽流形态、飞溅产生和焊接质量进行系统的特征选择,我们利用机器学习(ML)分类器实现了95%的目标。特别是梯度增强分类器(GBC)、线性判别分析(LDA)、多项逻辑回归(MNL-LR)、支持向量机(SVM)和随机森林(RF),其中RF对焊缝质量的分类准确率达到99%。然后使用RF进行递归特征消除(RFE),通过鲁棒性分析,我们成功地将特征数量从49个减少到9个,同时保持令人满意的性能(精确度= 0.981,F1-score = 0.961, AUROC = 0.997)。焊缝羽流位置、羽流偏心率和羽流宽度是提高节点纯度和分类精度的最基本特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prediction of weld quality in laser welding of hardmetal and steel using high-speed imaging and machine learning methods
Laser welding of steel and hardmetal presents significant challenges due to their differing material properties. Improper laser welding parameters can result in unstable joints, ultimately leading to reduced mechanical strength of the weld. Therefore, defining an optimal process window is critical to ensuring weld quality. In addition, a continuous process monitoring method like High-Speed Imaging (HSI) is essential in real industrial applications to maintain stability and detect potential defects. Understanding plume dynamics helps identify the most important features of weld quality, but it also provides deeper insight into operational parameters that discriminate different weld types. Analysis of individual image plume frames from HSI reveals distinct statistical features that are identified as unique to each welding condition. Performing systematic feature selection using plume morphology, spatter generation and weld quality, we achieved>95 % leveraging Machine Learning (ML) classifiers. Particularly, Gradient Boosting Classifier (GBC), Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA), Multinomial Logistic Regression (MNL-LR), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Random Forest (RF), where the RF obtained >99 % classification accuracy of weld quality. The RF was then used in performing Recursive Feature Elimination (RFE), and with the robustness analysis, we managed to reduce the number of features from forty-nine to nine features while maintaining satisfactory performance (Accuracy = 0.981, F1-score = 0.961, AUROC = 0.997). The position of the weld plume, plume eccentricity and plume width are the most essential features that lead to the improvement of node purity and classification accuracy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
9.80%
发文量
58
审稿时长
44 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信