Lenka Novakova, Igal Rosenstein, Markus Axelsson, Menno M Schoonheim, Ralph Hb Benedict, Tom A Fuchs
{"title":"重复SDMT测试和多发性硬化症的练习效果和噪音的平台。","authors":"Lenka Novakova, Igal Rosenstein, Markus Axelsson, Menno M Schoonheim, Ralph Hb Benedict, Tom A Fuchs","doi":"10.1177/13524585251344794","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) is the most widely used test of cognition in people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS), and repeated testing is confounded by test-retest noise and practice effects.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the extent to which SDMT practice effects build and plateau with high-frequency testing, reliable cutoffs for longitudinal change, and whether short-interval testing improves detection of cognitive decline.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PwMS were tested with the SDMT monthly across 3 years. Plateau regression analyses were used to determine inflection points of practice effects, and the reliable-change was assessed. To evaluate effects of testing density on cognitive decline detection, this sample was compared with a separate low-density testing group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 71 people with relapsing-remitting MS (77.5% female), mean (standard deviation (SD)) age 37.3 (9.3), with 27.8 (21.3) SDMT assessments over 3.2 (2.4) years. The plateau of practice effects was reached after 18 repetitions (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Within this sample, ⩾7-point SDMT change was needed to detect cognitive decline with 90% confidence. Higher testing density did not improve detection of cognitive decline (<i>p</i> = 0.256).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We observed practice effects building for eighteen SDMT assessments and test-retest variability consistent with literature. These results provide guidance on SDMT which should be accounted for with alternate versions and reliable-change methodologies.</p>","PeriodicalId":520714,"journal":{"name":"Multiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England)","volume":" ","pages":"13524585251344794"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Plateau of practice effects and noise with repeat SDMT testing and in multiple sclerosis.\",\"authors\":\"Lenka Novakova, Igal Rosenstein, Markus Axelsson, Menno M Schoonheim, Ralph Hb Benedict, Tom A Fuchs\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/13524585251344794\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) is the most widely used test of cognition in people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS), and repeated testing is confounded by test-retest noise and practice effects.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the extent to which SDMT practice effects build and plateau with high-frequency testing, reliable cutoffs for longitudinal change, and whether short-interval testing improves detection of cognitive decline.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PwMS were tested with the SDMT monthly across 3 years. Plateau regression analyses were used to determine inflection points of practice effects, and the reliable-change was assessed. To evaluate effects of testing density on cognitive decline detection, this sample was compared with a separate low-density testing group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 71 people with relapsing-remitting MS (77.5% female), mean (standard deviation (SD)) age 37.3 (9.3), with 27.8 (21.3) SDMT assessments over 3.2 (2.4) years. The plateau of practice effects was reached after 18 repetitions (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Within this sample, ⩾7-point SDMT change was needed to detect cognitive decline with 90% confidence. Higher testing density did not improve detection of cognitive decline (<i>p</i> = 0.256).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We observed practice effects building for eighteen SDMT assessments and test-retest variability consistent with literature. These results provide guidance on SDMT which should be accounted for with alternate versions and reliable-change methodologies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520714,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Multiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"13524585251344794\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Multiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/13524585251344794\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Multiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13524585251344794","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Plateau of practice effects and noise with repeat SDMT testing and in multiple sclerosis.
Background: The Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) is the most widely used test of cognition in people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS), and repeated testing is confounded by test-retest noise and practice effects.
Objective: To investigate the extent to which SDMT practice effects build and plateau with high-frequency testing, reliable cutoffs for longitudinal change, and whether short-interval testing improves detection of cognitive decline.
Methods: PwMS were tested with the SDMT monthly across 3 years. Plateau regression analyses were used to determine inflection points of practice effects, and the reliable-change was assessed. To evaluate effects of testing density on cognitive decline detection, this sample was compared with a separate low-density testing group.
Results: The study included 71 people with relapsing-remitting MS (77.5% female), mean (standard deviation (SD)) age 37.3 (9.3), with 27.8 (21.3) SDMT assessments over 3.2 (2.4) years. The plateau of practice effects was reached after 18 repetitions (p < 0.001). Within this sample, ⩾7-point SDMT change was needed to detect cognitive decline with 90% confidence. Higher testing density did not improve detection of cognitive decline (p = 0.256).
Conclusion: We observed practice effects building for eighteen SDMT assessments and test-retest variability consistent with literature. These results provide guidance on SDMT which should be accounted for with alternate versions and reliable-change methodologies.