Frans-Jozef Vandeputte, Mathieu Gevers, Hans Welters, Kristoff Corten
{"title":"关节内抗生素:治疗感染无骨水泥全髋关节置换术的直接方法。","authors":"Frans-Jozef Vandeputte, Mathieu Gevers, Hans Welters, Kristoff Corten","doi":"10.1302/0301-620X.107B6.BJJ-2024-0853.R1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The use of intra-articular antibiotics in the treatment of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) can achieve a concentration which is sufficient to eradicate a biofilm. This may mitigate the need for removal of infected but well-fixed cementless components of a total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, the use of percutaneous catheters might lead to multiresistance or persistent multiorganism infections. The aim of this study was to report the results of a series in which an intra-articular antibiotic infusion was added to a single-stage revision for infected cementless THAs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 18 patients underwent 18 single-stage revision THAs which were performed for acute (n = 9) or chronic (n = 9) PJI, following a primary (n = 12) or revision (n = 6) cementless THA. After an extensive debridement, modular components were replaced, but all well-fixed components were retained. Two Hickmann catheters were introduced into the joint space, through which intra-articular antibiotics were introduced for two weeks. Intravenous antibiotics were also administered during this time, followed by oral antibiotics until three months after surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At a mean follow-up of 5.4 years (3.3 to 7.19), all patients had a normal ESR and white blood cell count. The CRP remained slightly elevated in three patients, although they were pain-free and showed no signs of infection. No patient developed antibiotic-related renal or systemic dysfunction postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We found that for the treatment of an infected cementless THA, retention of well-fixed components was feasible, with the addition of intra-articular antibiotics to a standard single-stage regime. None of the 18 patients had persistent infection or catheter-induced drug resistance, at a mean follow-up of 5.4 years.</p>","PeriodicalId":48944,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Journal","volume":"107-B 6 Supple B","pages":"3-8"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intra-articular antibiotics : a direct approach to the treatment of infected cementless total hip arthroplasty.\",\"authors\":\"Frans-Jozef Vandeputte, Mathieu Gevers, Hans Welters, Kristoff Corten\",\"doi\":\"10.1302/0301-620X.107B6.BJJ-2024-0853.R1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The use of intra-articular antibiotics in the treatment of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) can achieve a concentration which is sufficient to eradicate a biofilm. This may mitigate the need for removal of infected but well-fixed cementless components of a total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, the use of percutaneous catheters might lead to multiresistance or persistent multiorganism infections. The aim of this study was to report the results of a series in which an intra-articular antibiotic infusion was added to a single-stage revision for infected cementless THAs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 18 patients underwent 18 single-stage revision THAs which were performed for acute (n = 9) or chronic (n = 9) PJI, following a primary (n = 12) or revision (n = 6) cementless THA. After an extensive debridement, modular components were replaced, but all well-fixed components were retained. Two Hickmann catheters were introduced into the joint space, through which intra-articular antibiotics were introduced for two weeks. Intravenous antibiotics were also administered during this time, followed by oral antibiotics until three months after surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At a mean follow-up of 5.4 years (3.3 to 7.19), all patients had a normal ESR and white blood cell count. The CRP remained slightly elevated in three patients, although they were pain-free and showed no signs of infection. No patient developed antibiotic-related renal or systemic dysfunction postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We found that for the treatment of an infected cementless THA, retention of well-fixed components was feasible, with the addition of intra-articular antibiotics to a standard single-stage regime. None of the 18 patients had persistent infection or catheter-induced drug resistance, at a mean follow-up of 5.4 years.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48944,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bone & Joint Journal\",\"volume\":\"107-B 6 Supple B\",\"pages\":\"3-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bone & Joint Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.107B6.BJJ-2024-0853.R1\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bone & Joint Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.107B6.BJJ-2024-0853.R1","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Intra-articular antibiotics : a direct approach to the treatment of infected cementless total hip arthroplasty.
Aims: The use of intra-articular antibiotics in the treatment of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) can achieve a concentration which is sufficient to eradicate a biofilm. This may mitigate the need for removal of infected but well-fixed cementless components of a total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, the use of percutaneous catheters might lead to multiresistance or persistent multiorganism infections. The aim of this study was to report the results of a series in which an intra-articular antibiotic infusion was added to a single-stage revision for infected cementless THAs.
Methods: A total of 18 patients underwent 18 single-stage revision THAs which were performed for acute (n = 9) or chronic (n = 9) PJI, following a primary (n = 12) or revision (n = 6) cementless THA. After an extensive debridement, modular components were replaced, but all well-fixed components were retained. Two Hickmann catheters were introduced into the joint space, through which intra-articular antibiotics were introduced for two weeks. Intravenous antibiotics were also administered during this time, followed by oral antibiotics until three months after surgery.
Results: At a mean follow-up of 5.4 years (3.3 to 7.19), all patients had a normal ESR and white blood cell count. The CRP remained slightly elevated in three patients, although they were pain-free and showed no signs of infection. No patient developed antibiotic-related renal or systemic dysfunction postoperatively.
Conclusion: We found that for the treatment of an infected cementless THA, retention of well-fixed components was feasible, with the addition of intra-articular antibiotics to a standard single-stage regime. None of the 18 patients had persistent infection or catheter-induced drug resistance, at a mean follow-up of 5.4 years.
期刊介绍:
We welcome original articles from any part of the world. The papers are assessed by members of the Editorial Board and our international panel of expert reviewers, then either accepted for publication or rejected by the Editor. We receive over 2000 submissions each year and accept about 250 for publication, many after revisions recommended by the reviewers, editors or statistical advisers. A decision usually takes between six and eight weeks. Each paper is assessed by two reviewers with a special interest in the subject covered by the paper, and also by members of the editorial team. Controversial papers will be discussed at a full meeting of the Editorial Board. Publication is between four and six months after acceptance.