Thomas R Williamson, Ian W Kennedy, Mark R J Jenkinson, Ben Wheelwright, Nicholas Kane, R M Dominic Meek
{"title":"15年髋关节置换术:失败的预测因素。","authors":"Thomas R Williamson, Ian W Kennedy, Mark R J Jenkinson, Ben Wheelwright, Nicholas Kane, R M Dominic Meek","doi":"10.1302/0301-620X.107B6.BJJ-2024-1045.R1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>A range of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing (MoM-HR) implants have shown good functional outcomes, but some have been associated with adverse reactions to metal debris (ARMD) and early failure, requiring regular follow-up and monitoring of the blood metal ion levels. The aim of this study was to report the minimum 15-year survival of the Durom hip resurfacing system (Zimmer Biomet, USA), the functional outcome, and factors which were predictive of failure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A consecutive series of patients undergoing Durom MoM-HR at a single centre between January 2000 and December 2008 were included. Demographic variables, the size of the implant, radiological parameters, and the most recent blood metal ion levels were collected. The primary outcome measure was failure; secondary outcome measures included the Oxford Hip Score (OHS). Multivariable logistic regression was used to predict failure and identify the factors most strongly associated with failure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 695 hips in 597 patients, 61.2% of whom were male, were included. The mean age of the patients was 51.5 years (SD 8.7). Survival at a mean follow-up of 15.2 years (SD 1.9) was 86.6% (602 of 695 hips). Implant survival was significantly increased in males (92.2% (95% CI 89.7 to 94.8) vs 77.8% (95% CI 72.8 to 82.7); p < 0.001) and with femoral components sized ≥ 50 mm (91.7% (95% CI 88.7 to 94.7) vs 82.3% (95% CI 78.4 to 86.2); p < 0.001). Failure was mostly due to aseptic loosening (42 hips; 6%) and ARMD (27 hips; 3.9%). The mean postoperative OHS was 31.9 (SD 13.5) for patients requiring revision and 41.8 (SD 9.2) for those not requiring revision (p < 0.001). Predictive factors of failure in the regression model included sex, the angle of inclination and migration of the acetabular component, the postoperative OHS and the blood chromium ion levels (Pseudo-R<sup>2</sup> 0.279). Standardized regression coefficients were greatest for migration of the acetabular component (0.855) and OHS (-0.606).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study presents the longest reported follow-up for the Durom MoM-HR, with excellent survival and functional outcomes at 15 years' follow-up in males and with ≥ 50 mm femoral components. Most failures were due to aseptic loosening. Migration of the acetabular component and symptomatology (OHS) were the factors which most strongly predicted failure.</p>","PeriodicalId":48944,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Journal","volume":"107-B 6 Supple B","pages":"55-61"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Durom hip resurfacing at 15 years : predictive factors for failure.\",\"authors\":\"Thomas R Williamson, Ian W Kennedy, Mark R J Jenkinson, Ben Wheelwright, Nicholas Kane, R M Dominic Meek\",\"doi\":\"10.1302/0301-620X.107B6.BJJ-2024-1045.R1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>A range of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing (MoM-HR) implants have shown good functional outcomes, but some have been associated with adverse reactions to metal debris (ARMD) and early failure, requiring regular follow-up and monitoring of the blood metal ion levels. The aim of this study was to report the minimum 15-year survival of the Durom hip resurfacing system (Zimmer Biomet, USA), the functional outcome, and factors which were predictive of failure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A consecutive series of patients undergoing Durom MoM-HR at a single centre between January 2000 and December 2008 were included. Demographic variables, the size of the implant, radiological parameters, and the most recent blood metal ion levels were collected. The primary outcome measure was failure; secondary outcome measures included the Oxford Hip Score (OHS). Multivariable logistic regression was used to predict failure and identify the factors most strongly associated with failure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 695 hips in 597 patients, 61.2% of whom were male, were included. The mean age of the patients was 51.5 years (SD 8.7). Survival at a mean follow-up of 15.2 years (SD 1.9) was 86.6% (602 of 695 hips). Implant survival was significantly increased in males (92.2% (95% CI 89.7 to 94.8) vs 77.8% (95% CI 72.8 to 82.7); p < 0.001) and with femoral components sized ≥ 50 mm (91.7% (95% CI 88.7 to 94.7) vs 82.3% (95% CI 78.4 to 86.2); p < 0.001). Failure was mostly due to aseptic loosening (42 hips; 6%) and ARMD (27 hips; 3.9%). The mean postoperative OHS was 31.9 (SD 13.5) for patients requiring revision and 41.8 (SD 9.2) for those not requiring revision (p < 0.001). Predictive factors of failure in the regression model included sex, the angle of inclination and migration of the acetabular component, the postoperative OHS and the blood chromium ion levels (Pseudo-R<sup>2</sup> 0.279). Standardized regression coefficients were greatest for migration of the acetabular component (0.855) and OHS (-0.606).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study presents the longest reported follow-up for the Durom MoM-HR, with excellent survival and functional outcomes at 15 years' follow-up in males and with ≥ 50 mm femoral components. Most failures were due to aseptic loosening. Migration of the acetabular component and symptomatology (OHS) were the factors which most strongly predicted failure.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48944,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bone & Joint Journal\",\"volume\":\"107-B 6 Supple B\",\"pages\":\"55-61\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bone & Joint Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.107B6.BJJ-2024-1045.R1\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bone & Joint Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.107B6.BJJ-2024-1045.R1","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:一系列金属对金属髋关节表面置换(MoM-HR)植入物显示出良好的功能效果,但一些植入物与金属碎片(ARMD)的不良反应和早期失效有关,需要定期随访和监测血液金属离子水平。本研究的目的是报告Durom髋关节表面置换系统(Zimmer Biomet, USA)的至少15年生存率、功能结果和预测失败的因素。方法:纳入2000年1月至2008年12月在同一中心连续接受Durom MoM-HR治疗的患者。收集了人口统计学变量、植入物的大小、放射学参数和最近的血液金属离子水平。主要结局指标为失败;次要结局指标包括牛津髋关节评分(OHS)。多变量逻辑回归用于预测失效,并确定与失效最密切相关的因素。结果:597例患者共695髋,其中61.2%为男性。患者平均年龄51.5岁(SD 8.7)。平均随访15.2年(SD 1.9)的生存率为86.6%(695髋中有602例)。男性种植体存活率显著增加(92.2% (95% CI 89.7 ~ 94.8) vs 77.8% (95% CI 72.8 ~ 82.7);p < 0.001)和股骨假体尺寸≥50 mm (91.7% (95% CI 88.7 ~ 94.7) vs 82.3% (95% CI 78.4 ~ 86.2);P < 0.001)。失败主要是由于无菌性松动(42髋;6%)和ARMD(27髋;3.9%)。需要翻修的患者术后平均OHS为31.9 (SD 13.5),不需要翻修的患者术后平均OHS为41.8 (SD 9.2) (p < 0.001)。回归模型失败的预测因素包括性别、髋臼假体的倾角和移位角度、术后OHS和血铬离子水平(拟系数r2 0.279)。髋臼移位(0.855)和OHS(-0.606)的标准化回归系数最大。结论:本研究报告了Durom MoM-HR随访时间最长的研究,在男性和股骨假体≥50 mm的患者中,随访15年生存率和功能预后良好。大多数失效是由于无菌松动。髋臼假体的移位和症状(OHS)是预测失败的最重要因素。
Durom hip resurfacing at 15 years : predictive factors for failure.
Aims: A range of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing (MoM-HR) implants have shown good functional outcomes, but some have been associated with adverse reactions to metal debris (ARMD) and early failure, requiring regular follow-up and monitoring of the blood metal ion levels. The aim of this study was to report the minimum 15-year survival of the Durom hip resurfacing system (Zimmer Biomet, USA), the functional outcome, and factors which were predictive of failure.
Methods: A consecutive series of patients undergoing Durom MoM-HR at a single centre between January 2000 and December 2008 were included. Demographic variables, the size of the implant, radiological parameters, and the most recent blood metal ion levels were collected. The primary outcome measure was failure; secondary outcome measures included the Oxford Hip Score (OHS). Multivariable logistic regression was used to predict failure and identify the factors most strongly associated with failure.
Results: A total of 695 hips in 597 patients, 61.2% of whom were male, were included. The mean age of the patients was 51.5 years (SD 8.7). Survival at a mean follow-up of 15.2 years (SD 1.9) was 86.6% (602 of 695 hips). Implant survival was significantly increased in males (92.2% (95% CI 89.7 to 94.8) vs 77.8% (95% CI 72.8 to 82.7); p < 0.001) and with femoral components sized ≥ 50 mm (91.7% (95% CI 88.7 to 94.7) vs 82.3% (95% CI 78.4 to 86.2); p < 0.001). Failure was mostly due to aseptic loosening (42 hips; 6%) and ARMD (27 hips; 3.9%). The mean postoperative OHS was 31.9 (SD 13.5) for patients requiring revision and 41.8 (SD 9.2) for those not requiring revision (p < 0.001). Predictive factors of failure in the regression model included sex, the angle of inclination and migration of the acetabular component, the postoperative OHS and the blood chromium ion levels (Pseudo-R2 0.279). Standardized regression coefficients were greatest for migration of the acetabular component (0.855) and OHS (-0.606).
Conclusion: This study presents the longest reported follow-up for the Durom MoM-HR, with excellent survival and functional outcomes at 15 years' follow-up in males and with ≥ 50 mm femoral components. Most failures were due to aseptic loosening. Migration of the acetabular component and symptomatology (OHS) were the factors which most strongly predicted failure.
期刊介绍:
We welcome original articles from any part of the world. The papers are assessed by members of the Editorial Board and our international panel of expert reviewers, then either accepted for publication or rejected by the Editor. We receive over 2000 submissions each year and accept about 250 for publication, many after revisions recommended by the reviewers, editors or statistical advisers. A decision usually takes between six and eight weeks. Each paper is assessed by two reviewers with a special interest in the subject covered by the paper, and also by members of the editorial team. Controversial papers will be discussed at a full meeting of the Editorial Board. Publication is between four and six months after acceptance.