Ofir Ben Gal, James Doonan, Naeil Lotfi, Samuel McMahon, Gavin Baker, Gillian Cribb, Corey David Chan, M Ather Siddiqi, Sanjay Gupta
{"title":"改良格拉斯哥预后评分在软骨肉瘤患者管理中的预后价值:一项多中心研究。","authors":"Ofir Ben Gal, James Doonan, Naeil Lotfi, Samuel McMahon, Gavin Baker, Gillian Cribb, Corey David Chan, M Ather Siddiqi, Sanjay Gupta","doi":"10.1302/0301-620X.107B6.BJJ-2024-0596.R2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The prognostic role of systemic inflammatory biomarkers in patients with chondrosarcoma remains unclear, and evidence is lacking. The modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS) is an inflammation-based prognostic score consisting of preoperative CRP and albumin. This has been validated for a number of carcinomas and soft-tissue sarcoma, where its use is recommended. This national multicentre study aimed to investigate the prognostic significance of preoperative systemic inflammatory biomarkers, primarily the mGPS, in the prediction of survival in patients with a chondrosarcoma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who had undergone an elective resection of a primary or secondary chondrosarcoma between January 2006 and December 2020 were identified from the prospectively maintained databases of seven collaborating UK bone sarcoma units. Laboratory and clinical data, as well as oncological outcomes, were collected from the patient records with a minimum of two years of follow-up. Data were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier survival and uni- and multivariate analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 549 patients were included in our study. We found that increased mGPS, tumour grade, size, age, local recurrence, metastasis, and inflammatory markers were significantly associated with reduced overall survival. mGPS was able to stratify the overall survival of patients in all grades of chondrosarcoma, especially when divided into mGPS score 0 versus mGPS 1 or 2.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings indicate that inflammatory markers and mGPS strongly correlate with the survival of patients with a chondrosarcoma. We recommend its use in their early assessment to better stratify prognosis, reinforce decision-making, and potentially improve outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":48944,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Journal","volume":"107-B 6","pages":"649-656"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The prognostic value of the modified Glasgow Prognostic Score in the management of patients with chondrosarcoma : a multicentre study.\",\"authors\":\"Ofir Ben Gal, James Doonan, Naeil Lotfi, Samuel McMahon, Gavin Baker, Gillian Cribb, Corey David Chan, M Ather Siddiqi, Sanjay Gupta\",\"doi\":\"10.1302/0301-620X.107B6.BJJ-2024-0596.R2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The prognostic role of systemic inflammatory biomarkers in patients with chondrosarcoma remains unclear, and evidence is lacking. The modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS) is an inflammation-based prognostic score consisting of preoperative CRP and albumin. This has been validated for a number of carcinomas and soft-tissue sarcoma, where its use is recommended. This national multicentre study aimed to investigate the prognostic significance of preoperative systemic inflammatory biomarkers, primarily the mGPS, in the prediction of survival in patients with a chondrosarcoma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who had undergone an elective resection of a primary or secondary chondrosarcoma between January 2006 and December 2020 were identified from the prospectively maintained databases of seven collaborating UK bone sarcoma units. Laboratory and clinical data, as well as oncological outcomes, were collected from the patient records with a minimum of two years of follow-up. Data were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier survival and uni- and multivariate analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 549 patients were included in our study. We found that increased mGPS, tumour grade, size, age, local recurrence, metastasis, and inflammatory markers were significantly associated with reduced overall survival. mGPS was able to stratify the overall survival of patients in all grades of chondrosarcoma, especially when divided into mGPS score 0 versus mGPS 1 or 2.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings indicate that inflammatory markers and mGPS strongly correlate with the survival of patients with a chondrosarcoma. We recommend its use in their early assessment to better stratify prognosis, reinforce decision-making, and potentially improve outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48944,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bone & Joint Journal\",\"volume\":\"107-B 6\",\"pages\":\"649-656\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bone & Joint Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.107B6.BJJ-2024-0596.R2\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bone & Joint Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.107B6.BJJ-2024-0596.R2","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
The prognostic value of the modified Glasgow Prognostic Score in the management of patients with chondrosarcoma : a multicentre study.
Aims: The prognostic role of systemic inflammatory biomarkers in patients with chondrosarcoma remains unclear, and evidence is lacking. The modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS) is an inflammation-based prognostic score consisting of preoperative CRP and albumin. This has been validated for a number of carcinomas and soft-tissue sarcoma, where its use is recommended. This national multicentre study aimed to investigate the prognostic significance of preoperative systemic inflammatory biomarkers, primarily the mGPS, in the prediction of survival in patients with a chondrosarcoma.
Methods: Patients who had undergone an elective resection of a primary or secondary chondrosarcoma between January 2006 and December 2020 were identified from the prospectively maintained databases of seven collaborating UK bone sarcoma units. Laboratory and clinical data, as well as oncological outcomes, were collected from the patient records with a minimum of two years of follow-up. Data were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier survival and uni- and multivariate analysis.
Results: A total of 549 patients were included in our study. We found that increased mGPS, tumour grade, size, age, local recurrence, metastasis, and inflammatory markers were significantly associated with reduced overall survival. mGPS was able to stratify the overall survival of patients in all grades of chondrosarcoma, especially when divided into mGPS score 0 versus mGPS 1 or 2.
Conclusion: Our findings indicate that inflammatory markers and mGPS strongly correlate with the survival of patients with a chondrosarcoma. We recommend its use in their early assessment to better stratify prognosis, reinforce decision-making, and potentially improve outcomes.
期刊介绍:
We welcome original articles from any part of the world. The papers are assessed by members of the Editorial Board and our international panel of expert reviewers, then either accepted for publication or rejected by the Editor. We receive over 2000 submissions each year and accept about 250 for publication, many after revisions recommended by the reviewers, editors or statistical advisers. A decision usually takes between six and eight weeks. Each paper is assessed by two reviewers with a special interest in the subject covered by the paper, and also by members of the editorial team. Controversial papers will be discussed at a full meeting of the Editorial Board. Publication is between four and six months after acceptance.