早期综合老年评估与老年人髋部骨折护理结果之间关系的系统综述。

IF 4.9 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Veena Mazarello Paes, Andrew Ting, James Masters, Mahalia Vanyah Ignez Paes, Simon Mathew Graham, Matthew L Costa
{"title":"早期综合老年评估与老年人髋部骨折护理结果之间关系的系统综述。","authors":"Veena Mazarello Paes, Andrew Ting, James Masters, Mahalia Vanyah Ignez Paes, Simon Mathew Graham, Matthew L Costa","doi":"10.1302/0301-620X.107B6.BJJ-2024-1255.R1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Performance indicators are increasingly used to improve the quality of healthcare provided to hip fracture patients. Joint care, under orthopaedic surgeons and physicians with an interest in older patients, is one of the more common indicators of high-quality care. In this systematic review, we investigated the association between 'comprehensive geriatric assessment' and patient outcomes following hip fracture injury.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In total, 12 electronic databases and other sources were searched for evidence, and the methodological quality of studies meeting the inclusion criteria was assessed. The protocol for this suite of related systematic reviews was registered with PROSPERO (ID: CRD42023417515).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 24,591 articles were reviewed, and 39 studies met the inclusion criteria for the review, involving a total of 25,363 patients aged over 60 years with a hip fracture. There were five randomized clinical trials, three quasi-experimental studies, two non-randomized parallel group control trials, 22 pre-/post-intervention studies, and seven retrospective cohort studies, conducted between January 1992 and December 2021. The timing and content of a comprehensive geriatric assessment was ill-defined in many studies and care pathways were heterogeneous, which precluded meta-analysis of the data. Early comprehensive geriatric assessment was associated with improved outcomes in 31 of the 36 (86%) patient-reported outcomes, including improved mobility (acute/long-term), functional status, and better quality of life. In total, 155 out of 219 (70.78%) clinical outcomes derived from hospital records showed a positive association with early comprehensive geriatric review, including reduced preoperative time and length of hospital stay, reduced incidence of postoperative complications, fewer hospital readmissions, and lower mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Early comprehensive geriatric assessments after hip fracture in older people is associated with improved patient-reported outcomes and better clinical outcomes such as reduced incidence of complications, length of hospital stay, preoperative waiting time, and mortality. Standardization of the definitions of 'early' and 'comprehensive' geriatric assessments and consistent reporting of care pathway models would improve future evidence synthesis.</p>","PeriodicalId":48944,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Journal","volume":"107-B 6","pages":"595-603"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A systematic review of the association between early comprehensive geriatric assessment and outcomes in hip fracture care for older people.\",\"authors\":\"Veena Mazarello Paes, Andrew Ting, James Masters, Mahalia Vanyah Ignez Paes, Simon Mathew Graham, Matthew L Costa\",\"doi\":\"10.1302/0301-620X.107B6.BJJ-2024-1255.R1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Performance indicators are increasingly used to improve the quality of healthcare provided to hip fracture patients. Joint care, under orthopaedic surgeons and physicians with an interest in older patients, is one of the more common indicators of high-quality care. In this systematic review, we investigated the association between 'comprehensive geriatric assessment' and patient outcomes following hip fracture injury.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In total, 12 electronic databases and other sources were searched for evidence, and the methodological quality of studies meeting the inclusion criteria was assessed. The protocol for this suite of related systematic reviews was registered with PROSPERO (ID: CRD42023417515).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 24,591 articles were reviewed, and 39 studies met the inclusion criteria for the review, involving a total of 25,363 patients aged over 60 years with a hip fracture. There were five randomized clinical trials, three quasi-experimental studies, two non-randomized parallel group control trials, 22 pre-/post-intervention studies, and seven retrospective cohort studies, conducted between January 1992 and December 2021. The timing and content of a comprehensive geriatric assessment was ill-defined in many studies and care pathways were heterogeneous, which precluded meta-analysis of the data. Early comprehensive geriatric assessment was associated with improved outcomes in 31 of the 36 (86%) patient-reported outcomes, including improved mobility (acute/long-term), functional status, and better quality of life. In total, 155 out of 219 (70.78%) clinical outcomes derived from hospital records showed a positive association with early comprehensive geriatric review, including reduced preoperative time and length of hospital stay, reduced incidence of postoperative complications, fewer hospital readmissions, and lower mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Early comprehensive geriatric assessments after hip fracture in older people is associated with improved patient-reported outcomes and better clinical outcomes such as reduced incidence of complications, length of hospital stay, preoperative waiting time, and mortality. Standardization of the definitions of 'early' and 'comprehensive' geriatric assessments and consistent reporting of care pathway models would improve future evidence synthesis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48944,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bone & Joint Journal\",\"volume\":\"107-B 6\",\"pages\":\"595-603\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bone & Joint Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.107B6.BJJ-2024-1255.R1\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bone & Joint Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.107B6.BJJ-2024-1255.R1","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:性能指标越来越多地用于提高髋部骨折患者的医疗质量。由骨科医生和对老年患者感兴趣的医生进行的关节护理是高质量护理的常见指标之一。在这篇系统综述中,我们调查了髋部骨折损伤后“综合老年评估”与患者预后之间的关系。方法:共检索12个电子数据库和其他来源的证据,并评估符合纳入标准的研究的方法学质量。这套相关系统评价的方案已在PROSPERO注册(ID: CRD42023417515)。结果:共纳入24,591篇文献,39项研究符合纳入标准,共纳入25,363例60岁以上髋部骨折患者。在1992年1月至2021年12月期间进行了5项随机临床试验、3项准实验研究、2项非随机平行组对照试验、22项干预前/干预后研究和7项回顾性队列研究。在许多研究中,全面老年评估的时间和内容定义不清,护理途径也不均匀,这妨碍了数据的荟萃分析。早期综合老年学评估与36例(86%)患者报告的预后中31例的预后改善相关,包括活动能力改善(急性/长期)、功能状态改善和生活质量改善。从医院记录得出的219项临床结果中,有155项(70.78%)显示与早期综合老年病学复查正相关,包括术前时间和住院时间缩短、术后并发症发生率降低、再入院率降低和死亡率降低。结论:老年人髋部骨折后的早期综合老年病学评估与改善患者报告的结果和更好的临床结果相关,如减少并发症的发生率、住院时间、术前等待时间和死亡率。“早期”和“全面”老年评估定义的标准化以及护理途径模型的一致报告将改善未来的证据综合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A systematic review of the association between early comprehensive geriatric assessment and outcomes in hip fracture care for older people.

Aims: Performance indicators are increasingly used to improve the quality of healthcare provided to hip fracture patients. Joint care, under orthopaedic surgeons and physicians with an interest in older patients, is one of the more common indicators of high-quality care. In this systematic review, we investigated the association between 'comprehensive geriatric assessment' and patient outcomes following hip fracture injury.

Methods: In total, 12 electronic databases and other sources were searched for evidence, and the methodological quality of studies meeting the inclusion criteria was assessed. The protocol for this suite of related systematic reviews was registered with PROSPERO (ID: CRD42023417515).

Results: A total of 24,591 articles were reviewed, and 39 studies met the inclusion criteria for the review, involving a total of 25,363 patients aged over 60 years with a hip fracture. There were five randomized clinical trials, three quasi-experimental studies, two non-randomized parallel group control trials, 22 pre-/post-intervention studies, and seven retrospective cohort studies, conducted between January 1992 and December 2021. The timing and content of a comprehensive geriatric assessment was ill-defined in many studies and care pathways were heterogeneous, which precluded meta-analysis of the data. Early comprehensive geriatric assessment was associated with improved outcomes in 31 of the 36 (86%) patient-reported outcomes, including improved mobility (acute/long-term), functional status, and better quality of life. In total, 155 out of 219 (70.78%) clinical outcomes derived from hospital records showed a positive association with early comprehensive geriatric review, including reduced preoperative time and length of hospital stay, reduced incidence of postoperative complications, fewer hospital readmissions, and lower mortality.

Conclusion: Early comprehensive geriatric assessments after hip fracture in older people is associated with improved patient-reported outcomes and better clinical outcomes such as reduced incidence of complications, length of hospital stay, preoperative waiting time, and mortality. Standardization of the definitions of 'early' and 'comprehensive' geriatric assessments and consistent reporting of care pathway models would improve future evidence synthesis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Bone & Joint Journal
Bone & Joint Journal ORTHOPEDICS-SURGERY
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
10.90%
发文量
318
期刊介绍: We welcome original articles from any part of the world. The papers are assessed by members of the Editorial Board and our international panel of expert reviewers, then either accepted for publication or rejected by the Editor. We receive over 2000 submissions each year and accept about 250 for publication, many after revisions recommended by the reviewers, editors or statistical advisers. A decision usually takes between six and eight weeks. Each paper is assessed by two reviewers with a special interest in the subject covered by the paper, and also by members of the editorial team. Controversial papers will be discussed at a full meeting of the Editorial Board. Publication is between four and six months after acceptance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信