韩国手术室工作人员手术时分心因素的调查。

IF 1 Q3 SURGERY
Jeomin Kang, Songyi Lee, Jueun Jung, Yiseul Sim, Yoojin Lee, Boyoung Park, Kyungja Kim
{"title":"韩国手术室工作人员手术时分心因素的调查。","authors":"Jeomin Kang, Songyi Lee, Jueun Jung, Yiseul Sim, Yoojin Lee, Boyoung Park, Kyungja Kim","doi":"10.1177/17504589251340153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to identify disruptions perceived by operating theatre staff to improve concentration, patient safety and quality of care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A survey of 156 medical staff at a tertiary hospital in Seoul analysed disruptions using the chi-square (χ<sup>2</sup>) test according to participant characteristics.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Equipment issues were the most disruptive, with 91.7% reporting 'equipment availability'. Frequently experienced factors included 'surgery-related discussions' and 'operating theatre temperature'. The 'absence of the surgical team' was rated the most disruptive (90.4%) and the most negatively impactful (93.6%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The most disruptive factor perceived by the operating theatre staff was equipment issues, emphasising the need for strategies to minimise disruptions. Addressing these issues is crucial to improving operating theatre efficiency, patient safety and quality of care.</p>","PeriodicalId":35481,"journal":{"name":"Journal of perioperative practice","volume":" ","pages":"17504589251340153"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A survey on factors distracting operating theatre staff during surgery in Korea.\",\"authors\":\"Jeomin Kang, Songyi Lee, Jueun Jung, Yiseul Sim, Yoojin Lee, Boyoung Park, Kyungja Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17504589251340153\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to identify disruptions perceived by operating theatre staff to improve concentration, patient safety and quality of care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A survey of 156 medical staff at a tertiary hospital in Seoul analysed disruptions using the chi-square (χ<sup>2</sup>) test according to participant characteristics.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Equipment issues were the most disruptive, with 91.7% reporting 'equipment availability'. Frequently experienced factors included 'surgery-related discussions' and 'operating theatre temperature'. The 'absence of the surgical team' was rated the most disruptive (90.4%) and the most negatively impactful (93.6%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The most disruptive factor perceived by the operating theatre staff was equipment issues, emphasising the need for strategies to minimise disruptions. Addressing these issues is crucial to improving operating theatre efficiency, patient safety and quality of care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35481,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of perioperative practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"17504589251340153\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of perioperative practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17504589251340153\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of perioperative practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17504589251340153","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在识别手术室工作人员感知到的干扰,以提高注意力、患者安全和护理质量。方法:对首尔某三级医院156名医务人员进行调查,根据参与者特征采用χ2检验分析干扰情况。调查结果:设备问题是最具破坏性的,91.7%的人报告了“设备可用性”。常见的因素包括“手术相关讨论”和“手术室温度”。“手术团队的缺席”被评为最具破坏性(90.4%)和最具负面影响(93.6%)。结论:手术室工作人员认为最具破坏性的因素是设备问题,强调需要制定策略以尽量减少干扰。解决这些问题对于提高手术室效率、患者安全和护理质量至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A survey on factors distracting operating theatre staff during surgery in Korea.

Objective: This study aimed to identify disruptions perceived by operating theatre staff to improve concentration, patient safety and quality of care.

Methods: A survey of 156 medical staff at a tertiary hospital in Seoul analysed disruptions using the chi-square (χ2) test according to participant characteristics.

Findings: Equipment issues were the most disruptive, with 91.7% reporting 'equipment availability'. Frequently experienced factors included 'surgery-related discussions' and 'operating theatre temperature'. The 'absence of the surgical team' was rated the most disruptive (90.4%) and the most negatively impactful (93.6%).

Conclusions: The most disruptive factor perceived by the operating theatre staff was equipment issues, emphasising the need for strategies to minimise disruptions. Addressing these issues is crucial to improving operating theatre efficiency, patient safety and quality of care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of perioperative practice
Journal of perioperative practice Nursing-Medical and Surgical Nursing
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
59
期刊介绍: The Journal of Perioperative Practice (JPP) is the official journal of the Association for Perioperative Practice (AfPP). It is an international, peer reviewed journal with a multidisciplinary ethos across all aspects of perioperative care. The overall aim of the journal is to improve patient safety through informing and developing practice. It is an informative professional journal which provides current evidence-based practice, clinical, management and educational developments for practitioners working in the perioperative environment. The journal promotes perioperative practice by publishing clinical research-based articles, literature reviews, topical discussions, advice on clinical issues, current news items and product information.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信