在早期姑息治疗的重症监护病房中使用改良的惊喜问题。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Emily L Dock, Cynthia Bowers, Carmen Davis, Shilpee Sinha
{"title":"在早期姑息治疗的重症监护病房中使用改良的惊喜问题。","authors":"Emily L Dock, Cynthia Bowers, Carmen Davis, Shilpee Sinha","doi":"10.4037/ccn2025141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with critical illness often seek meaningful relationships with members of their care teams. The patient experience can be enhanced through a goals-of-care conversation, an aspect of palliative care that focuses on the patient-clinician relationship. Despite recommendations for early palliative care interventions, no standardized time for generalists to initiate palliative care interventions in the acute care setting has been established.</p><p><strong>Local problem: </strong>An academic hospital identified a need for earlier palliative care interventions for patients admitted to the medical intensive care unit. The aim of this quality improvement project was to improve early palliative care interventions in the intensive care unit by increasing numbers of documented surrogate decision-makers and goals-of-care conversations. Newman's theory of health as expanding consciousness was used as a guide to improve the patient-clinician relationship through communication, early establishment of goals of care, and development of patient-centered care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Recently admitted patients were screened during interprofessional team huddles with a modified surprise question (\"Would you be surprised if this patient died during this hospitalization?\") to identify those who might benefit from an early goals-of-care conversation. The preimplementation group included all admitted patients and the postimplementation group included only patients with a \"no\" on the surprise question.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analysis included 174 patients (139 before implementation, 35 after implementation). In the preimplementation group, 99 patients (71%) had documented surrogate decision-makers and 26 (19%) had documented goals-of-care conversations. In the postimplementation group, 34 patients (97%) had documented surrogate decision-makers and 14 (40%) had documented goals-of-care conversations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients screened with the modified surprise question upon admission to the intensive care unit received earlier palliative care interventions, enhancing patient-centered care.</p>","PeriodicalId":10738,"journal":{"name":"Critical care nurse","volume":"45 3","pages":"41-46"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using a Modified Surprise Question in the Intensive Care Unit for Early Palliative Care.\",\"authors\":\"Emily L Dock, Cynthia Bowers, Carmen Davis, Shilpee Sinha\",\"doi\":\"10.4037/ccn2025141\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with critical illness often seek meaningful relationships with members of their care teams. The patient experience can be enhanced through a goals-of-care conversation, an aspect of palliative care that focuses on the patient-clinician relationship. Despite recommendations for early palliative care interventions, no standardized time for generalists to initiate palliative care interventions in the acute care setting has been established.</p><p><strong>Local problem: </strong>An academic hospital identified a need for earlier palliative care interventions for patients admitted to the medical intensive care unit. The aim of this quality improvement project was to improve early palliative care interventions in the intensive care unit by increasing numbers of documented surrogate decision-makers and goals-of-care conversations. Newman's theory of health as expanding consciousness was used as a guide to improve the patient-clinician relationship through communication, early establishment of goals of care, and development of patient-centered care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Recently admitted patients were screened during interprofessional team huddles with a modified surprise question (\\\"Would you be surprised if this patient died during this hospitalization?\\\") to identify those who might benefit from an early goals-of-care conversation. The preimplementation group included all admitted patients and the postimplementation group included only patients with a \\\"no\\\" on the surprise question.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analysis included 174 patients (139 before implementation, 35 after implementation). In the preimplementation group, 99 patients (71%) had documented surrogate decision-makers and 26 (19%) had documented goals-of-care conversations. In the postimplementation group, 34 patients (97%) had documented surrogate decision-makers and 14 (40%) had documented goals-of-care conversations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients screened with the modified surprise question upon admission to the intensive care unit received earlier palliative care interventions, enhancing patient-centered care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10738,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical care nurse\",\"volume\":\"45 3\",\"pages\":\"41-46\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical care nurse\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4037/ccn2025141\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical care nurse","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4037/ccn2025141","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:重症患者经常寻求与护理团队成员建立有意义的关系。患者体验可以通过护理目标对话来增强,这是姑息治疗的一个方面,侧重于患者-临床关系。尽管有早期姑息治疗干预的建议,但尚未建立全科医生在急性护理环境中启动姑息治疗干预的标准化时间。当地问题:一家学术医院确定需要对住院重症监护病房的患者进行早期姑息治疗干预。本质量改进项目的目的是通过增加记录在案的替代决策者和护理目标对话的数量,改善重症监护病房的早期姑息治疗干预措施。纽曼的健康是一种扩展意识的理论被用来作为指导,通过沟通、早期建立护理目标和发展以患者为中心的护理来改善医患关系。方法:在跨专业小组会议中对最近入院的患者进行筛选,并提出一个改进的意外问题(“如果这个患者在住院期间死亡,你会感到惊讶吗?”),以确定哪些患者可能从早期的护理目标对话中受益。实施前组包括所有住院患者,实施后组只包括在意外问题上回答“否”的患者。结果:分析174例患者(实施前139例,实施后35例)。在实施前组中,99名患者(71%)记录了代理决策者,26名患者(19%)记录了护理目标对话。在实施后组中,34名患者(97%)记录了替代决策者,14名患者(40%)记录了护理目标对话。结论:经改良惊喜问题筛选的患者在进入重症监护室时接受了更早的姑息治疗干预,加强了以患者为中心的护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Using a Modified Surprise Question in the Intensive Care Unit for Early Palliative Care.

Background: Patients with critical illness often seek meaningful relationships with members of their care teams. The patient experience can be enhanced through a goals-of-care conversation, an aspect of palliative care that focuses on the patient-clinician relationship. Despite recommendations for early palliative care interventions, no standardized time for generalists to initiate palliative care interventions in the acute care setting has been established.

Local problem: An academic hospital identified a need for earlier palliative care interventions for patients admitted to the medical intensive care unit. The aim of this quality improvement project was to improve early palliative care interventions in the intensive care unit by increasing numbers of documented surrogate decision-makers and goals-of-care conversations. Newman's theory of health as expanding consciousness was used as a guide to improve the patient-clinician relationship through communication, early establishment of goals of care, and development of patient-centered care.

Methods: Recently admitted patients were screened during interprofessional team huddles with a modified surprise question ("Would you be surprised if this patient died during this hospitalization?") to identify those who might benefit from an early goals-of-care conversation. The preimplementation group included all admitted patients and the postimplementation group included only patients with a "no" on the surprise question.

Results: Analysis included 174 patients (139 before implementation, 35 after implementation). In the preimplementation group, 99 patients (71%) had documented surrogate decision-makers and 26 (19%) had documented goals-of-care conversations. In the postimplementation group, 34 patients (97%) had documented surrogate decision-makers and 14 (40%) had documented goals-of-care conversations.

Conclusion: Patients screened with the modified surprise question upon admission to the intensive care unit received earlier palliative care interventions, enhancing patient-centered care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Critical care nurse
Critical care nurse 医学-护理
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
68
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Critical Care Nurse (CCN) is an official publication of the American Association of Critical-Care Nurses (AACN). Authors are invited to submit manuscripts for consideration and peer review. Clinical topics must meet the mission of CCN and address nursing practice of acute and critically ill patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信