{"title":"成人重症监护病房替代决策者对卫生保健专业人员的信任:一项范围审查","authors":"Caleb Armstrong, Gloria Duke","doi":"10.4037/ccn2025646","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Surrogate decision-makers frequently experience negative emotional and physical outcomes due to their decision-making role in the adult intensive care unit. These negative outcomes may be mitigated by high-quality communication, but for this type of communication to occur, surrogate decision-makers must have trust in health care professionals.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore what is known about surrogate decision-makers' trust in health care professionals in the adult intensive care unit setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this scoping review, CINAHL, APA PsycArticles, APA PsycInfo, MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, the Web of Science, and Google Scholar were searched from inception to March 9, 2024.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 64 articles met the inclusion criteria. Surrogate decision-makers step into their decision-making role with a baseline level of trust in health care professionals, which is then modified by those professionals' behaviors such as technical competence, communication, honesty, benevolence, and interpersonal skills. The surrogate decision-maker's level of trust in health care professionals affects the surrogate's decision-making and behavior in the intensive care unit. A high-quality instrument is needed to measure surrogate decision-maker trust in health care professionals in the adult intensive care unit setting so that future research can focus on validating various trust-building interventions in this population.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Bedside staff members should incorporate the currently available research findings about building trust with surrogate decision-makers into their professional practice. Future research should focus on the development, validation, and dissemination of a new instrument designed specifically to measure surrogate decision-maker trust in health care professionals.</p>","PeriodicalId":10738,"journal":{"name":"Critical care nurse","volume":"45 3","pages":"23-32"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Surrogate Decision-Makers' Trust in Health Care Professionals in the Adult Intensive Care Unit: A Scoping Review.\",\"authors\":\"Caleb Armstrong, Gloria Duke\",\"doi\":\"10.4037/ccn2025646\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Surrogate decision-makers frequently experience negative emotional and physical outcomes due to their decision-making role in the adult intensive care unit. These negative outcomes may be mitigated by high-quality communication, but for this type of communication to occur, surrogate decision-makers must have trust in health care professionals.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore what is known about surrogate decision-makers' trust in health care professionals in the adult intensive care unit setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this scoping review, CINAHL, APA PsycArticles, APA PsycInfo, MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, the Web of Science, and Google Scholar were searched from inception to March 9, 2024.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 64 articles met the inclusion criteria. Surrogate decision-makers step into their decision-making role with a baseline level of trust in health care professionals, which is then modified by those professionals' behaviors such as technical competence, communication, honesty, benevolence, and interpersonal skills. The surrogate decision-maker's level of trust in health care professionals affects the surrogate's decision-making and behavior in the intensive care unit. A high-quality instrument is needed to measure surrogate decision-maker trust in health care professionals in the adult intensive care unit setting so that future research can focus on validating various trust-building interventions in this population.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Bedside staff members should incorporate the currently available research findings about building trust with surrogate decision-makers into their professional practice. Future research should focus on the development, validation, and dissemination of a new instrument designed specifically to measure surrogate decision-maker trust in health care professionals.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10738,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical care nurse\",\"volume\":\"45 3\",\"pages\":\"23-32\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical care nurse\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4037/ccn2025646\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical care nurse","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4037/ccn2025646","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:在成人重症监护病房中,代理决策者由于其决策角色而经常经历负面的情绪和身体结果。这些负面结果可以通过高质量的沟通来减轻,但要实现这种沟通,代理决策者必须信任医疗保健专业人员。目的:探讨成人重症监护病房代理决策者对卫生保健专业人员的信任情况。方法:在这篇范围综述中,检索了CINAHL、APA PsycArticles、APA PsycInfo、MEDLINE、Cochrane Library、Web of Science和谷歌Scholar,检索时间从成立到2024年3月9日。结果:64篇文章符合纳入标准。代理决策者以对卫生保健专业人员的基本信任水平进入决策角色,然后被这些专业人员的行为(如技术能力、沟通、诚实、仁慈和人际交往能力)所修改。代理人决策者对卫生保健专业人员的信任程度影响代理人在重症监护病房的决策和行为。需要一种高质量的工具来测量成人重症监护病房环境中卫生保健专业人员对代理决策者的信任,以便未来的研究可以集中在验证这一人群中各种建立信任的干预措施。结论:床边工作人员应将现有的关于与替代决策者建立信任的研究成果纳入其专业实践。未来的研究应侧重于开发、验证和传播一种专门设计的新工具,以测量卫生保健专业人员对代理决策者的信任。
Surrogate Decision-Makers' Trust in Health Care Professionals in the Adult Intensive Care Unit: A Scoping Review.
Background: Surrogate decision-makers frequently experience negative emotional and physical outcomes due to their decision-making role in the adult intensive care unit. These negative outcomes may be mitigated by high-quality communication, but for this type of communication to occur, surrogate decision-makers must have trust in health care professionals.
Objective: To explore what is known about surrogate decision-makers' trust in health care professionals in the adult intensive care unit setting.
Methods: In this scoping review, CINAHL, APA PsycArticles, APA PsycInfo, MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, the Web of Science, and Google Scholar were searched from inception to March 9, 2024.
Results: A total of 64 articles met the inclusion criteria. Surrogate decision-makers step into their decision-making role with a baseline level of trust in health care professionals, which is then modified by those professionals' behaviors such as technical competence, communication, honesty, benevolence, and interpersonal skills. The surrogate decision-maker's level of trust in health care professionals affects the surrogate's decision-making and behavior in the intensive care unit. A high-quality instrument is needed to measure surrogate decision-maker trust in health care professionals in the adult intensive care unit setting so that future research can focus on validating various trust-building interventions in this population.
Conclusion: Bedside staff members should incorporate the currently available research findings about building trust with surrogate decision-makers into their professional practice. Future research should focus on the development, validation, and dissemination of a new instrument designed specifically to measure surrogate decision-maker trust in health care professionals.
期刊介绍:
Critical Care Nurse (CCN) is an official publication of the American Association of Critical-Care Nurses (AACN). Authors are invited to submit manuscripts for consideration and peer review. Clinical topics must meet the mission of CCN and address nursing practice of acute and critically ill patients.