Zaynab Somani, James S. Hodges, Srinath Chinnakotla, David Martin, Karthik Ramanathan, Gregory J. Beilman, Melena D. Bellin
{"title":"确定全胰切除术合并胰岛自体移植后持续血糖监测的目标","authors":"Zaynab Somani, James S. Hodges, Srinath Chinnakotla, David Martin, Karthik Ramanathan, Gregory J. Beilman, Melena D. Bellin","doi":"10.1111/ctr.70202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Targets for continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) are well established for type 1 and type 2 diabetes. In total pancreatectomy with islet autotransplantation (TPIAT), stricter glycemic targets are needed to avoid metabolic stress on transplanted islets, but no guidelines exist for CGM targets.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We aimed to determine CGM targets for TPIAT clinical management by associating CGM metrics with goal hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) ≤ 6.5%. Targets for time in range (TIR) 70–140, TIR 70–180, mean CGM glucose, and time in hyperglycemia (>140, >180, >250 mg/dL) were chosen to give good sensitivity and specificity for identifying HbA1c ≤6.5%.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>We included 256 pairs of 14-day CGM metrics with a concurrent HbA1c value (<i>n</i> = 82 patients, age 35 [IQR 19–46] years at surgery, 70% female) who were ≥0.5 years post TPIAT (median 4.1 years) and wearing Dexcom G6. Most patients had more than one HbA1c and corresponding CGM available (median 2 [IQR 1–4] per patient).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>We found that TIR 70–140 ≥ 50% and TIR 70–180 mg/dL ≥ 75% may be reasonable minimum targets for patients and providers using CGM data to manage diabetes long-term after TPIAT. Failure to meet these targets should prompt starting or adjusting insulin therapy, especially if hypoglycemia is not a concern.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10467,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Transplantation","volume":"39 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ctr.70202","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Defining Targets for Continuous Glucose Monitoring After Total Pancreatectomy With Islet Autotransplantation\",\"authors\":\"Zaynab Somani, James S. Hodges, Srinath Chinnakotla, David Martin, Karthik Ramanathan, Gregory J. Beilman, Melena D. Bellin\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ctr.70202\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>Targets for continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) are well established for type 1 and type 2 diabetes. In total pancreatectomy with islet autotransplantation (TPIAT), stricter glycemic targets are needed to avoid metabolic stress on transplanted islets, but no guidelines exist for CGM targets.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We aimed to determine CGM targets for TPIAT clinical management by associating CGM metrics with goal hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) ≤ 6.5%. Targets for time in range (TIR) 70–140, TIR 70–180, mean CGM glucose, and time in hyperglycemia (>140, >180, >250 mg/dL) were chosen to give good sensitivity and specificity for identifying HbA1c ≤6.5%.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>We included 256 pairs of 14-day CGM metrics with a concurrent HbA1c value (<i>n</i> = 82 patients, age 35 [IQR 19–46] years at surgery, 70% female) who were ≥0.5 years post TPIAT (median 4.1 years) and wearing Dexcom G6. Most patients had more than one HbA1c and corresponding CGM available (median 2 [IQR 1–4] per patient).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>We found that TIR 70–140 ≥ 50% and TIR 70–180 mg/dL ≥ 75% may be reasonable minimum targets for patients and providers using CGM data to manage diabetes long-term after TPIAT. Failure to meet these targets should prompt starting or adjusting insulin therapy, especially if hypoglycemia is not a concern.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10467,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Transplantation\",\"volume\":\"39 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ctr.70202\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Transplantation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ctr.70202\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ctr.70202","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Defining Targets for Continuous Glucose Monitoring After Total Pancreatectomy With Islet Autotransplantation
Introduction
Targets for continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) are well established for type 1 and type 2 diabetes. In total pancreatectomy with islet autotransplantation (TPIAT), stricter glycemic targets are needed to avoid metabolic stress on transplanted islets, but no guidelines exist for CGM targets.
Methods
We aimed to determine CGM targets for TPIAT clinical management by associating CGM metrics with goal hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) ≤ 6.5%. Targets for time in range (TIR) 70–140, TIR 70–180, mean CGM glucose, and time in hyperglycemia (>140, >180, >250 mg/dL) were chosen to give good sensitivity and specificity for identifying HbA1c ≤6.5%.
Results
We included 256 pairs of 14-day CGM metrics with a concurrent HbA1c value (n = 82 patients, age 35 [IQR 19–46] years at surgery, 70% female) who were ≥0.5 years post TPIAT (median 4.1 years) and wearing Dexcom G6. Most patients had more than one HbA1c and corresponding CGM available (median 2 [IQR 1–4] per patient).
Conclusion
We found that TIR 70–140 ≥ 50% and TIR 70–180 mg/dL ≥ 75% may be reasonable minimum targets for patients and providers using CGM data to manage diabetes long-term after TPIAT. Failure to meet these targets should prompt starting or adjusting insulin therapy, especially if hypoglycemia is not a concern.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Transplantation: The Journal of Clinical and Translational Research aims to serve as a channel of rapid communication for all those involved in the care of patients who require, or have had, organ or tissue transplants, including: kidney, intestine, liver, pancreas, islets, heart, heart valves, lung, bone marrow, cornea, skin, bone, and cartilage, viable or stored.
Published monthly, Clinical Transplantation’s scope is focused on the complete spectrum of present transplant therapies, as well as also those that are experimental or may become possible in future. Topics include:
Immunology and immunosuppression;
Patient preparation;
Social, ethical, and psychological issues;
Complications, short- and long-term results;
Artificial organs;
Donation and preservation of organ and tissue;
Translational studies;
Advances in tissue typing;
Updates on transplant pathology;.
Clinical and translational studies are particularly welcome, as well as focused reviews. Full-length papers and short communications are invited. Clinical reviews are encouraged, as well as seminal papers in basic science which might lead to immediate clinical application. Prominence is regularly given to the results of cooperative surveys conducted by the organ and tissue transplant registries.
Clinical Transplantation: The Journal of Clinical and Translational Research is essential reading for clinicians and researchers in the diverse field of transplantation: surgeons; clinical immunologists; cryobiologists; hematologists; gastroenterologists; hepatologists; pulmonologists; nephrologists; cardiologists; and endocrinologists. It will also be of interest to sociologists, psychologists, research workers, and to all health professionals whose combined efforts will improve the prognosis of transplant recipients.