加拿大多伦多的食物沙漠、食物幻象和中产阶级化

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Patrycia Menko , Dana Olstad , Adrian Buttazzoni , Leia Minaker
{"title":"加拿大多伦多的食物沙漠、食物幻象和中产阶级化","authors":"Patrycia Menko ,&nbsp;Dana Olstad ,&nbsp;Adrian Buttazzoni ,&nbsp;Leia Minaker","doi":"10.1016/j.healthplace.2025.103490","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Few studies have explored links between retail food environments and gentrifying neighbourhoods across cities. As populations shift and commercial development continues, unpacking “food gentrification” processes in low-equity areas is important for ensuring healthy and equitable food access across cities. To further investigate this potential phenomenon, we used both primary (retailer consultations) and secondary (Canadian census, Toronto Public Health food inspection, land use zoning) data to explore cross-sectional links between food deserts and food mirages, four measures of gentrification in Toronto using the GENUINE gentrification tool, and Business Improvement Areas (BIAs). Food deserts represented about a tenth (9.3 %) of all dissemination areas in Toronto while food mirages represented only 4.5 %. Yet, nearly half (45 %) of all low-equity areas in Toronto were food deserts and food mirages (affecting approximately 516,000 residents). All gentrification measures employed, including BIAs, were also significantly associated with the existence of food deserts (between 2.5 and 14.5 times higher odds, respectively) while only two were associated with the existence of food mirages after adjusting for commercial zoning (between 1.6 and 2.7 times higher odds, respectively). Surprisingly, food deserts, not food mirages, were more strongly associated with gentrification. Longitudinal research is needed to better capture and monitor the evolution of food mirages.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49302,"journal":{"name":"Health & Place","volume":"94 ","pages":"Article 103490"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Food deserts, food mirages, and gentrification in Toronto, Canada\",\"authors\":\"Patrycia Menko ,&nbsp;Dana Olstad ,&nbsp;Adrian Buttazzoni ,&nbsp;Leia Minaker\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.healthplace.2025.103490\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Few studies have explored links between retail food environments and gentrifying neighbourhoods across cities. As populations shift and commercial development continues, unpacking “food gentrification” processes in low-equity areas is important for ensuring healthy and equitable food access across cities. To further investigate this potential phenomenon, we used both primary (retailer consultations) and secondary (Canadian census, Toronto Public Health food inspection, land use zoning) data to explore cross-sectional links between food deserts and food mirages, four measures of gentrification in Toronto using the GENUINE gentrification tool, and Business Improvement Areas (BIAs). Food deserts represented about a tenth (9.3 %) of all dissemination areas in Toronto while food mirages represented only 4.5 %. Yet, nearly half (45 %) of all low-equity areas in Toronto were food deserts and food mirages (affecting approximately 516,000 residents). All gentrification measures employed, including BIAs, were also significantly associated with the existence of food deserts (between 2.5 and 14.5 times higher odds, respectively) while only two were associated with the existence of food mirages after adjusting for commercial zoning (between 1.6 and 2.7 times higher odds, respectively). Surprisingly, food deserts, not food mirages, were more strongly associated with gentrification. Longitudinal research is needed to better capture and monitor the evolution of food mirages.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49302,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health & Place\",\"volume\":\"94 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103490\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health & Place\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1353829225000802\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health & Place","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1353829225000802","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

很少有研究探讨零售食品环境与城市社区中产阶级化之间的联系。随着人口的转移和商业发展的继续,在低公平地区解除“粮食高档化”进程对于确保城市间健康和公平的粮食获取至关重要。为了进一步调查这一潜在现象,我们使用了主要(零售商咨询)和次要(加拿大人口普查、多伦多公共卫生食品检查、土地使用分区)数据来探索食物沙漠和食物海市蜃楼之间的横断面联系,使用GENUINE高档化工具对多伦多高档化进行了四项测量,以及商业改进区域(BIAs)。食物沙漠约占多伦多所有传播区域的十分之一(9.3%),而食物海市蜃楼仅占4.5%。然而,多伦多近一半(45%)的低净值地区是食物沙漠和食物海市蜃楼(影响了大约516,000名居民)。所有采用的高档化措施,包括BIAs,也与食物沙漠的存在显著相关(分别在2.5到14.5倍之间),而在调整商业区划后,只有两个与食物海市蜃景的存在相关(分别在1.6到2.7倍之间)。令人惊讶的是,食物沙漠,而不是食物海市蜃楼,与中产阶级化的关系更密切。为了更好地捕捉和监测食物幻象的演变,需要进行纵向研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Food deserts, food mirages, and gentrification in Toronto, Canada
Few studies have explored links between retail food environments and gentrifying neighbourhoods across cities. As populations shift and commercial development continues, unpacking “food gentrification” processes in low-equity areas is important for ensuring healthy and equitable food access across cities. To further investigate this potential phenomenon, we used both primary (retailer consultations) and secondary (Canadian census, Toronto Public Health food inspection, land use zoning) data to explore cross-sectional links between food deserts and food mirages, four measures of gentrification in Toronto using the GENUINE gentrification tool, and Business Improvement Areas (BIAs). Food deserts represented about a tenth (9.3 %) of all dissemination areas in Toronto while food mirages represented only 4.5 %. Yet, nearly half (45 %) of all low-equity areas in Toronto were food deserts and food mirages (affecting approximately 516,000 residents). All gentrification measures employed, including BIAs, were also significantly associated with the existence of food deserts (between 2.5 and 14.5 times higher odds, respectively) while only two were associated with the existence of food mirages after adjusting for commercial zoning (between 1.6 and 2.7 times higher odds, respectively). Surprisingly, food deserts, not food mirages, were more strongly associated with gentrification. Longitudinal research is needed to better capture and monitor the evolution of food mirages.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health & Place
Health & Place PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
6.20%
发文量
176
审稿时长
29 days
期刊介绍: he journal is an interdisciplinary journal dedicated to the study of all aspects of health and health care in which place or location matters.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信