Jørn Dalsgaard Nielsen , Thomas Steffen Hermann , Konstantinos Dimopoulos , Anne Storgaard Nørskov
{"title":"华法林对抗磷脂综合征患者和护理点检测虚高INR患者的治疗控制","authors":"Jørn Dalsgaard Nielsen , Thomas Steffen Hermann , Konstantinos Dimopoulos , Anne Storgaard Nørskov","doi":"10.1016/j.thromres.2025.109361","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The standard of care for thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is anticoagulation with vitamin K antagonists (VKA). Several studies have indicated that lupus anticoagulant (LA) can interfere with the international normalized ratio (INR) results obtained by point-of-care testing (POCT) devices. A subset of patients with APS has clinically significant systematic differences between POCT INR and plasma INR (P-INR) measured in the hospital laboratory.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>We aimed to investigate a potential correlation between POCT INR (CoaguChek, Roche Diagnostics) and P-INR in these patients.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>In our anticoagulation clinic, we compared 363 paired CoaguChek-INR (CC-INR) with P-INR results using Owren's method from 37 patients with APS receiving self-managed VKA. Each patient had a minimum of three paired measurements of CC-INR and P-INR and a median CC-INR/P-INR ratio > 1.20.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In all patients, we found a strong linear correlation between CC-INR and P-INR (median R<sup>2</sup>: 0.89; IQR: 0.78–0.94). Each patient had their own characteristic regression line from which CC-INR could be converted to P-INR. Thirty-four patients continued with self-managed treatment and the use of a conversion table. However, 3 patients had to switch to INR control in the anticoagulation clinic, as the upper limit of their therapeutic CC-INR interval exceeded the maximum (INR: 8.0) on their CoaguChek device.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>In a subset of patients with APS who, during self-managed VKA therapy, had persistently higher POCT INR than P-INR, the majority could continue with self-managed therapy using a conversion table, as the falsely elevated POCT INR values <!--> <!-->were linearly correlated to P-INR.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23064,"journal":{"name":"Thrombosis research","volume":"252 ","pages":"Article 109361"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Control of warfarin treatment in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome and falsely high INR at point-of-care-testing\",\"authors\":\"Jørn Dalsgaard Nielsen , Thomas Steffen Hermann , Konstantinos Dimopoulos , Anne Storgaard Nørskov\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.thromres.2025.109361\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The standard of care for thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is anticoagulation with vitamin K antagonists (VKA). Several studies have indicated that lupus anticoagulant (LA) can interfere with the international normalized ratio (INR) results obtained by point-of-care testing (POCT) devices. A subset of patients with APS has clinically significant systematic differences between POCT INR and plasma INR (P-INR) measured in the hospital laboratory.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>We aimed to investigate a potential correlation between POCT INR (CoaguChek, Roche Diagnostics) and P-INR in these patients.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>In our anticoagulation clinic, we compared 363 paired CoaguChek-INR (CC-INR) with P-INR results using Owren's method from 37 patients with APS receiving self-managed VKA. Each patient had a minimum of three paired measurements of CC-INR and P-INR and a median CC-INR/P-INR ratio > 1.20.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In all patients, we found a strong linear correlation between CC-INR and P-INR (median R<sup>2</sup>: 0.89; IQR: 0.78–0.94). Each patient had their own characteristic regression line from which CC-INR could be converted to P-INR. Thirty-four patients continued with self-managed treatment and the use of a conversion table. However, 3 patients had to switch to INR control in the anticoagulation clinic, as the upper limit of their therapeutic CC-INR interval exceeded the maximum (INR: 8.0) on their CoaguChek device.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>In a subset of patients with APS who, during self-managed VKA therapy, had persistently higher POCT INR than P-INR, the majority could continue with self-managed therapy using a conversion table, as the falsely elevated POCT INR values <!--> <!-->were linearly correlated to P-INR.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23064,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Thrombosis research\",\"volume\":\"252 \",\"pages\":\"Article 109361\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Thrombosis research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0049384825001112\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thrombosis research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0049384825001112","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Control of warfarin treatment in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome and falsely high INR at point-of-care-testing
Background
The standard of care for thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is anticoagulation with vitamin K antagonists (VKA). Several studies have indicated that lupus anticoagulant (LA) can interfere with the international normalized ratio (INR) results obtained by point-of-care testing (POCT) devices. A subset of patients with APS has clinically significant systematic differences between POCT INR and plasma INR (P-INR) measured in the hospital laboratory.
Objectives
We aimed to investigate a potential correlation between POCT INR (CoaguChek, Roche Diagnostics) and P-INR in these patients.
Materials and methods
In our anticoagulation clinic, we compared 363 paired CoaguChek-INR (CC-INR) with P-INR results using Owren's method from 37 patients with APS receiving self-managed VKA. Each patient had a minimum of three paired measurements of CC-INR and P-INR and a median CC-INR/P-INR ratio > 1.20.
Results
In all patients, we found a strong linear correlation between CC-INR and P-INR (median R2: 0.89; IQR: 0.78–0.94). Each patient had their own characteristic regression line from which CC-INR could be converted to P-INR. Thirty-four patients continued with self-managed treatment and the use of a conversion table. However, 3 patients had to switch to INR control in the anticoagulation clinic, as the upper limit of their therapeutic CC-INR interval exceeded the maximum (INR: 8.0) on their CoaguChek device.
Conclusions
In a subset of patients with APS who, during self-managed VKA therapy, had persistently higher POCT INR than P-INR, the majority could continue with self-managed therapy using a conversion table, as the falsely elevated POCT INR values were linearly correlated to P-INR.
期刊介绍:
Thrombosis Research is an international journal dedicated to the swift dissemination of new information on thrombosis, hemostasis, and vascular biology, aimed at advancing both science and clinical care. The journal publishes peer-reviewed original research, reviews, editorials, opinions, and critiques, covering both basic and clinical studies. Priority is given to research that promises novel approaches in the diagnosis, therapy, prognosis, and prevention of thrombotic and hemorrhagic diseases.