癌症幸存者数字健康干预中的患者参与策略:范围审查。

IF 7.7
PLOS digital health Pub Date : 2025-05-30 eCollection Date: 2025-05-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pdig.0000871
Maria Ren, Camila E Orsso, Homa Ghomashchi, Bruna R da Silva, Christa Aubrey, Ingrid Nielssen, Sophia Pin, Margaret L McNeely, Puneeta Tandon, Carla M Prado
{"title":"癌症幸存者数字健康干预中的患者参与策略:范围审查。","authors":"Maria Ren, Camila E Orsso, Homa Ghomashchi, Bruna R da Silva, Christa Aubrey, Ingrid Nielssen, Sophia Pin, Margaret L McNeely, Puneeta Tandon, Carla M Prado","doi":"10.1371/journal.pdig.0000871","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Individuals can face various mental and physical health challenges after a cancer diagnosis. Digital health platforms can address some of these challenges by providing self-management tools for improving lifestyle behaviors, while reducing the burden on healthcare systems and enhancing healthcare access to underserved populations. Involving individuals with a history of cancer, termed here as \"cancer survivors\", in the development and evaluation of digital health platforms can improve their effectiveness. This scoping review aimed to explore the state of patient engagement in research on digital health platforms for cancer survivors, including strategies for engagement, characteristics, and identifying gaps and barriers. A systematic search was conducted in OVID Medline, OVID EMBASE, and Scopus from inception until May 2023. The review followed Joanna Briggs Institute's guidance for scoping reviews. Eligible studies actively involved cancer survivors in the development or evaluation of digital health platforms. These studies focused on self-management digital health platforms delivering nutrition, physical activity, and/or mental health interventions. Reporting of patient engagement was evaluated according to the Guidance for Reporting Involvement of Patients and the Public 2 (GRIPP2). The search strategy captured 7 studies using various patient engagement approaches, with patient and public involvement being the most frequently used (43%, n = 3). Studies were conducted in 6 countries and most focused on the development or evaluation of web-based digital health platforms (71%, n = 5). Few studies reported all elements of GRIPP2's reporting checklist (29%, n = 2). We further identified barriers and areas of improvement for patient engagement in digital health research. Patient engagement improves digital health platforms, but few studies have meaningfully included patients, therefore reporting and evaluation of patient engagement is necessary to support its adoption in digital health research projects. In addition to exploring the gaps in patient engagement practices, this scoping review serves as a foundation for future research to advance patient-oriented digital health interventions for cancer survivors.</p>","PeriodicalId":74465,"journal":{"name":"PLOS digital health","volume":"4 5","pages":"e0000871"},"PeriodicalIF":7.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12124549/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient engagement strategies in digital health interventions for cancer survivors: A scoping review.\",\"authors\":\"Maria Ren, Camila E Orsso, Homa Ghomashchi, Bruna R da Silva, Christa Aubrey, Ingrid Nielssen, Sophia Pin, Margaret L McNeely, Puneeta Tandon, Carla M Prado\",\"doi\":\"10.1371/journal.pdig.0000871\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Individuals can face various mental and physical health challenges after a cancer diagnosis. Digital health platforms can address some of these challenges by providing self-management tools for improving lifestyle behaviors, while reducing the burden on healthcare systems and enhancing healthcare access to underserved populations. Involving individuals with a history of cancer, termed here as \\\"cancer survivors\\\", in the development and evaluation of digital health platforms can improve their effectiveness. This scoping review aimed to explore the state of patient engagement in research on digital health platforms for cancer survivors, including strategies for engagement, characteristics, and identifying gaps and barriers. A systematic search was conducted in OVID Medline, OVID EMBASE, and Scopus from inception until May 2023. The review followed Joanna Briggs Institute's guidance for scoping reviews. Eligible studies actively involved cancer survivors in the development or evaluation of digital health platforms. These studies focused on self-management digital health platforms delivering nutrition, physical activity, and/or mental health interventions. Reporting of patient engagement was evaluated according to the Guidance for Reporting Involvement of Patients and the Public 2 (GRIPP2). The search strategy captured 7 studies using various patient engagement approaches, with patient and public involvement being the most frequently used (43%, n = 3). Studies were conducted in 6 countries and most focused on the development or evaluation of web-based digital health platforms (71%, n = 5). Few studies reported all elements of GRIPP2's reporting checklist (29%, n = 2). We further identified barriers and areas of improvement for patient engagement in digital health research. Patient engagement improves digital health platforms, but few studies have meaningfully included patients, therefore reporting and evaluation of patient engagement is necessary to support its adoption in digital health research projects. In addition to exploring the gaps in patient engagement practices, this scoping review serves as a foundation for future research to advance patient-oriented digital health interventions for cancer survivors.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74465,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PLOS digital health\",\"volume\":\"4 5\",\"pages\":\"e0000871\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12124549/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PLOS digital health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pdig.0000871\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLOS digital health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pdig.0000871","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在癌症诊断后,个人可能面临各种心理和身体健康挑战。数字健康平台可以通过提供改善生活方式行为的自我管理工具,同时减轻医疗保健系统的负担,并为服务不足的人群提供更多的医疗服务,从而解决其中的一些挑战。让有癌症病史的个人(这里称为“癌症幸存者”)参与数字健康平台的开发和评估,可以提高其有效性。本次范围审查旨在探讨癌症幸存者数字健康平台研究中患者参与的状况,包括参与策略、特征以及识别差距和障碍。系统检索了OVID Medline, OVID EMBASE和Scopus从成立到2023年5月。审查遵循了乔安娜布里格斯研究所对范围审查的指导。符合条件的研究积极让癌症幸存者参与数字健康平台的开发或评估。这些研究的重点是提供营养、身体活动和/或心理健康干预措施的自我管理数字健康平台。患者参与的报告根据患者和公众参与报告指南2 (GRIPP2)进行评估。搜索策略捕获了使用各种患者参与方法的7项研究,其中患者和公众参与是最常用的(43%,n = 3)。研究在6个国家进行,主要侧重于基于网络的数字健康平台的开发或评估(71%,n = 5)。很少有研究报告了GRIPP2报告清单的所有要素(29%,n = 2)。我们进一步确定了患者参与数字健康研究的障碍和改进领域。患者参与改善了数字健康平台,但很少有研究有意义地将患者纳入其中,因此报告和评估患者参与对于支持在数字健康研究项目中采用患者参与是必要的。除了探索患者参与实践中的差距之外,该范围审查还为未来的研究奠定了基础,以推进针对癌症幸存者的以患者为导向的数字健康干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Patient engagement strategies in digital health interventions for cancer survivors: A scoping review.

Individuals can face various mental and physical health challenges after a cancer diagnosis. Digital health platforms can address some of these challenges by providing self-management tools for improving lifestyle behaviors, while reducing the burden on healthcare systems and enhancing healthcare access to underserved populations. Involving individuals with a history of cancer, termed here as "cancer survivors", in the development and evaluation of digital health platforms can improve their effectiveness. This scoping review aimed to explore the state of patient engagement in research on digital health platforms for cancer survivors, including strategies for engagement, characteristics, and identifying gaps and barriers. A systematic search was conducted in OVID Medline, OVID EMBASE, and Scopus from inception until May 2023. The review followed Joanna Briggs Institute's guidance for scoping reviews. Eligible studies actively involved cancer survivors in the development or evaluation of digital health platforms. These studies focused on self-management digital health platforms delivering nutrition, physical activity, and/or mental health interventions. Reporting of patient engagement was evaluated according to the Guidance for Reporting Involvement of Patients and the Public 2 (GRIPP2). The search strategy captured 7 studies using various patient engagement approaches, with patient and public involvement being the most frequently used (43%, n = 3). Studies were conducted in 6 countries and most focused on the development or evaluation of web-based digital health platforms (71%, n = 5). Few studies reported all elements of GRIPP2's reporting checklist (29%, n = 2). We further identified barriers and areas of improvement for patient engagement in digital health research. Patient engagement improves digital health platforms, but few studies have meaningfully included patients, therefore reporting and evaluation of patient engagement is necessary to support its adoption in digital health research projects. In addition to exploring the gaps in patient engagement practices, this scoping review serves as a foundation for future research to advance patient-oriented digital health interventions for cancer survivors.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信