蜜蜂(Apis mellifera L.)和野生蜜蜂资源竞争:这个问题有多大?

IF 2.2 3区 生物学 Q1 ZOOLOGY
Wade A Pike, Clare C Rittschof
{"title":"蜜蜂(Apis mellifera L.)和野生蜜蜂资源竞争:这个问题有多大?","authors":"Wade A Pike, Clare C Rittschof","doi":"10.1093/icb/icaf072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Western honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) has been managed by humans for centuries for honey, wax, and most recently, crop pollination. The deep history of human association with this species has enabled agricultural practices that reduce biodiversity of pollinating wild bees, largely through habitat modification. However, there is also interest in determining if Apis mellifera presence itself contributes significantly to wild bee population declines. Here we review the evidence of Apis mellifera effects on wild bees, with a particular emphasis on critically evaluating the evidence for detrimental impacts associated with resource competition. Despite accelerated research in this area, only ∼13% of resource competition studies evaluated fitness effects of Apis mellifera on wild bees, a research gap that has persisted for over 20 years. About three times as many studies have evaluated effects of Apis mellifera on wild bee community parameters, including wild bee abundance, which provides a measure of a landscape's \"bee carrying capacity\". Just over 20% of these studies show a negative correlation with Apis mellifera abundance. In a novel analysis of 68 additional studies measuring bee communities for a variety of other reasons, we found negative correlations between Apis mellifera abundance and any measure of the wild bee community (richness, abundance, etc.) for nine, and the measures showing Apis mellifera impacts were varied. For example, only two of these studies showed negative correlations between Apis mellifera and wild bee abundances. In contrast, we also found similar numbers of positive relationships between Apis mellifera and various wild bee community parameters, including ten studies that showed positive relationships between Apis mellifera and wild bee abundances. Most studies (64%) showed no relationship with any factor. We found no clear pattern to explain which habitat types are more vulnerable to Apis mellifera competition, nor is the literature clear on impactful densities of managed hives in particular environment types. We discuss suggestions for future research, as well as ways the research community could clarify its conservation priorities with respect to resource competition. Resource competition between Apis mellifera and wild bees is clearly a concern in some cases. However, more work is needed to identify and predict where Apis mellifera poses a significant threat to wild bee populations. Overall, the data do not support a generalized and widespread negative relationship between Apis mellifera abundance and wild bee community health. Rather, conservation measures that reliably improve wild bee health (habitat preservation and restoration) will likely have positive effects on Apis mellifera, and vice versa.</p>","PeriodicalId":54971,"journal":{"name":"Integrative and Comparative Biology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) and wild bee resource competition: how big is this problem?\",\"authors\":\"Wade A Pike, Clare C Rittschof\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/icb/icaf072\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The Western honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) has been managed by humans for centuries for honey, wax, and most recently, crop pollination. The deep history of human association with this species has enabled agricultural practices that reduce biodiversity of pollinating wild bees, largely through habitat modification. However, there is also interest in determining if Apis mellifera presence itself contributes significantly to wild bee population declines. Here we review the evidence of Apis mellifera effects on wild bees, with a particular emphasis on critically evaluating the evidence for detrimental impacts associated with resource competition. Despite accelerated research in this area, only ∼13% of resource competition studies evaluated fitness effects of Apis mellifera on wild bees, a research gap that has persisted for over 20 years. About three times as many studies have evaluated effects of Apis mellifera on wild bee community parameters, including wild bee abundance, which provides a measure of a landscape's \\\"bee carrying capacity\\\". Just over 20% of these studies show a negative correlation with Apis mellifera abundance. In a novel analysis of 68 additional studies measuring bee communities for a variety of other reasons, we found negative correlations between Apis mellifera abundance and any measure of the wild bee community (richness, abundance, etc.) for nine, and the measures showing Apis mellifera impacts were varied. For example, only two of these studies showed negative correlations between Apis mellifera and wild bee abundances. In contrast, we also found similar numbers of positive relationships between Apis mellifera and various wild bee community parameters, including ten studies that showed positive relationships between Apis mellifera and wild bee abundances. Most studies (64%) showed no relationship with any factor. We found no clear pattern to explain which habitat types are more vulnerable to Apis mellifera competition, nor is the literature clear on impactful densities of managed hives in particular environment types. We discuss suggestions for future research, as well as ways the research community could clarify its conservation priorities with respect to resource competition. Resource competition between Apis mellifera and wild bees is clearly a concern in some cases. However, more work is needed to identify and predict where Apis mellifera poses a significant threat to wild bee populations. Overall, the data do not support a generalized and widespread negative relationship between Apis mellifera abundance and wild bee community health. Rather, conservation measures that reliably improve wild bee health (habitat preservation and restoration) will likely have positive effects on Apis mellifera, and vice versa.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54971,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Integrative and Comparative Biology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Integrative and Comparative Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/icaf072\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ZOOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Integrative and Comparative Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/icaf072","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ZOOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

西方蜜蜂(Apis mellifera L.)已经被人类管理了几个世纪,用于蜂蜜、蜂蜡和最近的作物授粉。人类与这一物种的深厚历史使得农业实践减少了授粉野生蜜蜂的生物多样性,主要是通过改变栖息地。然而,人们也有兴趣确定蜜蜂的存在本身是否对野生蜜蜂种群的减少有重大贡献。在此,我们回顾了蜜蜂对野生蜜蜂的影响的证据,特别强调批判性地评估与资源竞争相关的有害影响的证据。尽管这一领域的研究正在加速,但只有13%的资源竞争研究评估了蜜蜂对野生蜜蜂的适合度影响,这一研究差距持续了20多年。大约有三倍的研究评估了蜜蜂对野生蜜蜂群落参数的影响,包括野生蜜蜂丰度,这提供了一个衡量景观“蜜蜂承载能力”的指标。在这些研究中,只有超过20%的研究显示与蜜蜂丰度呈负相关。在一项新的分析中,由于各种其他原因测量了蜜蜂群落的68项额外研究,我们发现蜜蜂丰度与野生蜜蜂群落的任何测量(丰富度,丰度等)之间存在负相关,并且显示蜜蜂影响的测量各不相同。例如,这些研究中只有两项显示了蜜蜂和野生蜜蜂丰度之间的负相关。相比之下,我们也发现了类似数量的蜜蜂与各种野生蜜蜂群落参数之间的正相关关系,包括10项研究表明蜜蜂与野生蜜蜂丰度之间存在正相关关系。大多数研究(64%)显示与任何因素都没有关系。我们没有发现明确的模式来解释哪种生境类型更容易受到蜜蜂竞争的影响,也没有文献清楚地说明特定环境类型下管理蜂箱的影响密度。我们讨论了对未来研究的建议,以及研究界如何在资源竞争方面澄清其保护优先事项。在某些情况下,Apis mellifera和野生蜜蜂之间的资源竞争显然是一个值得关注的问题。然而,需要做更多的工作来确定和预测蜜蜂对野生蜜蜂种群构成重大威胁的地方。总的来说,数据并不支持蜜蜂丰度与野生蜜蜂群落健康之间普遍存在负相关关系。相反,可靠地改善野生蜜蜂健康的保护措施(栖息地保护和恢复)可能会对蜜蜂产生积极影响,反之亦然。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) and wild bee resource competition: how big is this problem?

The Western honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) has been managed by humans for centuries for honey, wax, and most recently, crop pollination. The deep history of human association with this species has enabled agricultural practices that reduce biodiversity of pollinating wild bees, largely through habitat modification. However, there is also interest in determining if Apis mellifera presence itself contributes significantly to wild bee population declines. Here we review the evidence of Apis mellifera effects on wild bees, with a particular emphasis on critically evaluating the evidence for detrimental impacts associated with resource competition. Despite accelerated research in this area, only ∼13% of resource competition studies evaluated fitness effects of Apis mellifera on wild bees, a research gap that has persisted for over 20 years. About three times as many studies have evaluated effects of Apis mellifera on wild bee community parameters, including wild bee abundance, which provides a measure of a landscape's "bee carrying capacity". Just over 20% of these studies show a negative correlation with Apis mellifera abundance. In a novel analysis of 68 additional studies measuring bee communities for a variety of other reasons, we found negative correlations between Apis mellifera abundance and any measure of the wild bee community (richness, abundance, etc.) for nine, and the measures showing Apis mellifera impacts were varied. For example, only two of these studies showed negative correlations between Apis mellifera and wild bee abundances. In contrast, we also found similar numbers of positive relationships between Apis mellifera and various wild bee community parameters, including ten studies that showed positive relationships between Apis mellifera and wild bee abundances. Most studies (64%) showed no relationship with any factor. We found no clear pattern to explain which habitat types are more vulnerable to Apis mellifera competition, nor is the literature clear on impactful densities of managed hives in particular environment types. We discuss suggestions for future research, as well as ways the research community could clarify its conservation priorities with respect to resource competition. Resource competition between Apis mellifera and wild bees is clearly a concern in some cases. However, more work is needed to identify and predict where Apis mellifera poses a significant threat to wild bee populations. Overall, the data do not support a generalized and widespread negative relationship between Apis mellifera abundance and wild bee community health. Rather, conservation measures that reliably improve wild bee health (habitat preservation and restoration) will likely have positive effects on Apis mellifera, and vice versa.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
150
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Integrative and Comparative Biology ( ICB ), formerly American Zoologist , is one of the most highly respected and cited journals in the field of biology. The journal''s primary focus is to integrate the varying disciplines in this broad field, while maintaining the highest scientific quality. ICB''s peer-reviewed symposia provide first class syntheses of the top research in a field. ICB also publishes book reviews, reports, and special bulletins.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信