J Edward Murrell, Ashleigh Allgood, Arya Tamhane, Regan Gaskin, Luis F Pineda, Barry P Sleckman, Raegan W Durant, Soumya J Niranjan
{"title":"超越豚鼠神话:了解社区诊所参与临床试验的复杂态度。","authors":"J Edward Murrell, Ashleigh Allgood, Arya Tamhane, Regan Gaskin, Luis F Pineda, Barry P Sleckman, Raegan W Durant, Soumya J Niranjan","doi":"10.1007/s13187-025-02657-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The urgency to enhance cancer clinical trial enrollment among racial and ethnic minority patients is underscored by the rise in novel therapies. This study examines referral mechanisms from a community-based oncology care clinic to an academic medical center, evaluates the clinical trial knowledge of minority groups, and explores perceptions and attitudes toward trials. Using a sequential explanatory mixed methods research design, the Clinical Trial Knowledge Survey was administered to patients seen at the Hem/Onc clinic in a community medical center. Descriptive statistics were calculated, and multivariate analysis was used to examine associations between variables using STATA 18. Qualitative data from 11 semistructured interviews were analyzed by two independent investigators using NVivo 14. Themes were identified through a combination of deductive and inductive approaches. Of the 502 mailers sent, 98 individuals responded (response rate of 9.56%). The average age of participants was 54 years, predominantly single and African American. The majority of the respondents (62%) agreed that patient participation is crucial for generating new and effective treatments. Then, 65% believed that clinical trials are typically conducted on drugs presumed to be effective. However, 32.99% of the respondents perceived participation in clinical trials as a frightening experience. Three qualitative themes emerged: (i) While clinical trial awareness was limited, willingness to participate was strongly endorsed. (ii) Potential participants obtain knowledge about clinical trials from multiple sources, impacting their attitudes toward clinical trials. (iii) There is a need to tailor educational strategies to increase awareness of and participation in clinical trials. The findings emphasize the critical role of awareness and tailored, culturally congruent educational strategies that are crucial to bridge the knowledge gap, alleviate hesitations, and enhance cancer clinical trial participation rates among racial and ethnic minorities.</p>","PeriodicalId":50246,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Beyond the Guinea Pig Myth: Understanding Complex Attitudes Toward Clinical Trials Participation in a Community Clinic.\",\"authors\":\"J Edward Murrell, Ashleigh Allgood, Arya Tamhane, Regan Gaskin, Luis F Pineda, Barry P Sleckman, Raegan W Durant, Soumya J Niranjan\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13187-025-02657-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The urgency to enhance cancer clinical trial enrollment among racial and ethnic minority patients is underscored by the rise in novel therapies. This study examines referral mechanisms from a community-based oncology care clinic to an academic medical center, evaluates the clinical trial knowledge of minority groups, and explores perceptions and attitudes toward trials. Using a sequential explanatory mixed methods research design, the Clinical Trial Knowledge Survey was administered to patients seen at the Hem/Onc clinic in a community medical center. Descriptive statistics were calculated, and multivariate analysis was used to examine associations between variables using STATA 18. Qualitative data from 11 semistructured interviews were analyzed by two independent investigators using NVivo 14. Themes were identified through a combination of deductive and inductive approaches. Of the 502 mailers sent, 98 individuals responded (response rate of 9.56%). The average age of participants was 54 years, predominantly single and African American. The majority of the respondents (62%) agreed that patient participation is crucial for generating new and effective treatments. Then, 65% believed that clinical trials are typically conducted on drugs presumed to be effective. However, 32.99% of the respondents perceived participation in clinical trials as a frightening experience. Three qualitative themes emerged: (i) While clinical trial awareness was limited, willingness to participate was strongly endorsed. (ii) Potential participants obtain knowledge about clinical trials from multiple sources, impacting their attitudes toward clinical trials. (iii) There is a need to tailor educational strategies to increase awareness of and participation in clinical trials. The findings emphasize the critical role of awareness and tailored, culturally congruent educational strategies that are crucial to bridge the knowledge gap, alleviate hesitations, and enhance cancer clinical trial participation rates among racial and ethnic minorities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50246,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cancer Education\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cancer Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-025-02657-4\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cancer Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-025-02657-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Beyond the Guinea Pig Myth: Understanding Complex Attitudes Toward Clinical Trials Participation in a Community Clinic.
The urgency to enhance cancer clinical trial enrollment among racial and ethnic minority patients is underscored by the rise in novel therapies. This study examines referral mechanisms from a community-based oncology care clinic to an academic medical center, evaluates the clinical trial knowledge of minority groups, and explores perceptions and attitudes toward trials. Using a sequential explanatory mixed methods research design, the Clinical Trial Knowledge Survey was administered to patients seen at the Hem/Onc clinic in a community medical center. Descriptive statistics were calculated, and multivariate analysis was used to examine associations between variables using STATA 18. Qualitative data from 11 semistructured interviews were analyzed by two independent investigators using NVivo 14. Themes were identified through a combination of deductive and inductive approaches. Of the 502 mailers sent, 98 individuals responded (response rate of 9.56%). The average age of participants was 54 years, predominantly single and African American. The majority of the respondents (62%) agreed that patient participation is crucial for generating new and effective treatments. Then, 65% believed that clinical trials are typically conducted on drugs presumed to be effective. However, 32.99% of the respondents perceived participation in clinical trials as a frightening experience. Three qualitative themes emerged: (i) While clinical trial awareness was limited, willingness to participate was strongly endorsed. (ii) Potential participants obtain knowledge about clinical trials from multiple sources, impacting their attitudes toward clinical trials. (iii) There is a need to tailor educational strategies to increase awareness of and participation in clinical trials. The findings emphasize the critical role of awareness and tailored, culturally congruent educational strategies that are crucial to bridge the knowledge gap, alleviate hesitations, and enhance cancer clinical trial participation rates among racial and ethnic minorities.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Cancer Education, the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education (AACE) and the European Association for Cancer Education (EACE), is an international, quarterly journal dedicated to the publication of original contributions dealing with the varied aspects of cancer education for physicians, dentists, nurses, students, social workers and other allied health professionals, patients, the general public, and anyone interested in effective education about cancer related issues.
Articles featured include reports of original results of educational research, as well as discussions of current problems and techniques in cancer education. Manuscripts are welcome on such subjects as educational methods, instruments, and program evaluation. Suitable topics include teaching of basic science aspects of cancer; the assessment of attitudes toward cancer patient management; the teaching of diagnostic skills relevant to cancer; the evaluation of undergraduate, postgraduate, or continuing education programs; and articles about all aspects of cancer education from prevention to palliative care.
We encourage contributions to a special column called Reflections; these articles should relate to the human aspects of dealing with cancer, cancer patients, and their families and finding meaning and support in these efforts.
Letters to the Editor (600 words or less) dealing with published articles or matters of current interest are also invited.
Also featured are commentary; book and media reviews; and announcements of educational programs, fellowships, and grants.
Articles should be limited to no more than ten double-spaced typed pages, and there should be no more than three tables or figures and 25 references. We also encourage brief reports of five typewritten pages or less, with no more than one figure or table and 15 references.