超越豚鼠神话:了解社区诊所参与临床试验的复杂态度。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
J Edward Murrell, Ashleigh Allgood, Arya Tamhane, Regan Gaskin, Luis F Pineda, Barry P Sleckman, Raegan W Durant, Soumya J Niranjan
{"title":"超越豚鼠神话:了解社区诊所参与临床试验的复杂态度。","authors":"J Edward Murrell, Ashleigh Allgood, Arya Tamhane, Regan Gaskin, Luis F Pineda, Barry P Sleckman, Raegan W Durant, Soumya J Niranjan","doi":"10.1007/s13187-025-02657-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The urgency to enhance cancer clinical trial enrollment among racial and ethnic minority patients is underscored by the rise in novel therapies. This study examines referral mechanisms from a community-based oncology care clinic to an academic medical center, evaluates the clinical trial knowledge of minority groups, and explores perceptions and attitudes toward trials. Using a sequential explanatory mixed methods research design, the Clinical Trial Knowledge Survey was administered to patients seen at the Hem/Onc clinic in a community medical center. Descriptive statistics were calculated, and multivariate analysis was used to examine associations between variables using STATA 18. Qualitative data from 11 semistructured interviews were analyzed by two independent investigators using NVivo 14. Themes were identified through a combination of deductive and inductive approaches. Of the 502 mailers sent, 98 individuals responded (response rate of 9.56%). The average age of participants was 54 years, predominantly single and African American. The majority of the respondents (62%) agreed that patient participation is crucial for generating new and effective treatments. Then, 65% believed that clinical trials are typically conducted on drugs presumed to be effective. However, 32.99% of the respondents perceived participation in clinical trials as a frightening experience. Three qualitative themes emerged: (i) While clinical trial awareness was limited, willingness to participate was strongly endorsed. (ii) Potential participants obtain knowledge about clinical trials from multiple sources, impacting their attitudes toward clinical trials. (iii) There is a need to tailor educational strategies to increase awareness of and participation in clinical trials. The findings emphasize the critical role of awareness and tailored, culturally congruent educational strategies that are crucial to bridge the knowledge gap, alleviate hesitations, and enhance cancer clinical trial participation rates among racial and ethnic minorities.</p>","PeriodicalId":50246,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Beyond the Guinea Pig Myth: Understanding Complex Attitudes Toward Clinical Trials Participation in a Community Clinic.\",\"authors\":\"J Edward Murrell, Ashleigh Allgood, Arya Tamhane, Regan Gaskin, Luis F Pineda, Barry P Sleckman, Raegan W Durant, Soumya J Niranjan\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13187-025-02657-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The urgency to enhance cancer clinical trial enrollment among racial and ethnic minority patients is underscored by the rise in novel therapies. This study examines referral mechanisms from a community-based oncology care clinic to an academic medical center, evaluates the clinical trial knowledge of minority groups, and explores perceptions and attitudes toward trials. Using a sequential explanatory mixed methods research design, the Clinical Trial Knowledge Survey was administered to patients seen at the Hem/Onc clinic in a community medical center. Descriptive statistics were calculated, and multivariate analysis was used to examine associations between variables using STATA 18. Qualitative data from 11 semistructured interviews were analyzed by two independent investigators using NVivo 14. Themes were identified through a combination of deductive and inductive approaches. Of the 502 mailers sent, 98 individuals responded (response rate of 9.56%). The average age of participants was 54 years, predominantly single and African American. The majority of the respondents (62%) agreed that patient participation is crucial for generating new and effective treatments. Then, 65% believed that clinical trials are typically conducted on drugs presumed to be effective. However, 32.99% of the respondents perceived participation in clinical trials as a frightening experience. Three qualitative themes emerged: (i) While clinical trial awareness was limited, willingness to participate was strongly endorsed. (ii) Potential participants obtain knowledge about clinical trials from multiple sources, impacting their attitudes toward clinical trials. (iii) There is a need to tailor educational strategies to increase awareness of and participation in clinical trials. The findings emphasize the critical role of awareness and tailored, culturally congruent educational strategies that are crucial to bridge the knowledge gap, alleviate hesitations, and enhance cancer clinical trial participation rates among racial and ethnic minorities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50246,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cancer Education\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cancer Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-025-02657-4\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cancer Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-025-02657-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

新疗法的兴起凸显了在少数族裔患者中加强癌症临床试验招募的紧迫性。本研究考察了从社区肿瘤护理诊所到学术医疗中心的转诊机制,评估了少数群体的临床试验知识,并探讨了对试验的看法和态度。方法:采用顺序解释混合方法研究设计,对在社区医疗中心Hem/Onc诊所就诊的患者进行临床试验知识调查。计算描述性统计数据,并使用STATA 18进行多变量分析以检验变量之间的相关性。两名独立调查人员使用NVivo 14分析了11次半结构化访谈的定性数据。主题是通过演绎和归纳方法的结合来确定的。结果:在收到的502封邮件中,有98人回复,回复率为9.56%。参与者的平均年龄为54岁,主要是单身和非裔美国人。大多数答复者(62%)同意,患者参与对于产生新的有效治疗方法至关重要。然后,65%的人认为临床试验通常是在假定有效的药物上进行的。然而,32.99%的受访者认为参加临床试验是一种可怕的经历。出现了三个定性主题:(i)虽然对临床试验的认识有限,但强烈赞同参加试验的意愿。(ii)潜在参与者从多种来源获得临床试验知识,影响他们对临床试验的态度。㈢有必要调整教育战略,以提高对临床试验的认识和参与。讨论:研究结果强调了意识和量身定制的、符合文化的教育策略的关键作用,这些策略对于弥合知识差距、减轻犹豫、提高少数种族和少数民族的癌症临床试验参与率至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Beyond the Guinea Pig Myth: Understanding Complex Attitudes Toward Clinical Trials Participation in a Community Clinic.

The urgency to enhance cancer clinical trial enrollment among racial and ethnic minority patients is underscored by the rise in novel therapies. This study examines referral mechanisms from a community-based oncology care clinic to an academic medical center, evaluates the clinical trial knowledge of minority groups, and explores perceptions and attitudes toward trials. Using a sequential explanatory mixed methods research design, the Clinical Trial Knowledge Survey was administered to patients seen at the Hem/Onc clinic in a community medical center. Descriptive statistics were calculated, and multivariate analysis was used to examine associations between variables using STATA 18. Qualitative data from 11 semistructured interviews were analyzed by two independent investigators using NVivo 14. Themes were identified through a combination of deductive and inductive approaches. Of the 502 mailers sent, 98 individuals responded (response rate of 9.56%). The average age of participants was 54 years, predominantly single and African American. The majority of the respondents (62%) agreed that patient participation is crucial for generating new and effective treatments. Then, 65% believed that clinical trials are typically conducted on drugs presumed to be effective. However, 32.99% of the respondents perceived participation in clinical trials as a frightening experience. Three qualitative themes emerged: (i) While clinical trial awareness was limited, willingness to participate was strongly endorsed. (ii) Potential participants obtain knowledge about clinical trials from multiple sources, impacting their attitudes toward clinical trials. (iii) There is a need to tailor educational strategies to increase awareness of and participation in clinical trials. The findings emphasize the critical role of awareness and tailored, culturally congruent educational strategies that are crucial to bridge the knowledge gap, alleviate hesitations, and enhance cancer clinical trial participation rates among racial and ethnic minorities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cancer Education
Journal of Cancer Education 医学-医学:信息
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
6.20%
发文量
122
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cancer Education, the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education (AACE) and the European Association for Cancer Education (EACE), is an international, quarterly journal dedicated to the publication of original contributions dealing with the varied aspects of cancer education for physicians, dentists, nurses, students, social workers and other allied health professionals, patients, the general public, and anyone interested in effective education about cancer related issues. Articles featured include reports of original results of educational research, as well as discussions of current problems and techniques in cancer education. Manuscripts are welcome on such subjects as educational methods, instruments, and program evaluation. Suitable topics include teaching of basic science aspects of cancer; the assessment of attitudes toward cancer patient management; the teaching of diagnostic skills relevant to cancer; the evaluation of undergraduate, postgraduate, or continuing education programs; and articles about all aspects of cancer education from prevention to palliative care. We encourage contributions to a special column called Reflections; these articles should relate to the human aspects of dealing with cancer, cancer patients, and their families and finding meaning and support in these efforts. Letters to the Editor (600 words or less) dealing with published articles or matters of current interest are also invited. Also featured are commentary; book and media reviews; and announcements of educational programs, fellowships, and grants. Articles should be limited to no more than ten double-spaced typed pages, and there should be no more than three tables or figures and 25 references. We also encourage brief reports of five typewritten pages or less, with no more than one figure or table and 15 references.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信