{"title":"建立机构参考水平并比较儿科普通x射线的国际诊断参考水平。","authors":"Samuel M Lilli, Amanda A Perdomo","doi":"10.1007/s13246-025-01563-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Diagnostic Reference Levels (DRLs) can be used to assess the radiation exposure for specific protocols and identify areas of potential optimisation. Despite paediatric general X-ray (GXR) being a relatively low dose modality, due to the high radiosensitivity of children, it is imperative that doses remain as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA). This study aims to compare our institute's Dose-Area-Product (DAP) to currently available local, national, and regional DRLs, as there are currently no Australian DRL values established for paediatric GXR. The DAPs for GXR protocols are recorded in a commercially available DMS software, MyXrayDose, which generates a report of the Facility Reference Levels (FRLs) for all GXR protocols. As MyXrayDose uses age categories, our FRLs were converted to weight-based FRLs using the 50th percentile values derived from the World Health Organisation and Centres for Disease Control Weight-for-age charts. These were compared to published DRLs from eleven different countries and regions of the world. Pelvis Anterior-Posterior (AP)/Posterior-Anterior (PA), Abdomen AP/PA, Thorax AP/PA and Thorax lateral protocols were compared to available national and regional DRLs. For example, from 1st July 2023-30th June 2024, 1008 Abdomen AP/PA X-rays were conducted in Room 1 with a fixed GXR unit. The FRL for 31.2-56.5 kg (10-15 years) patients in Room 1 (1093 mGy.cm<sup>2</sup>) was more than 2.3 times greater than the European DRL (475 mGy.cm<sup>2</sup>). The FRLs for patients with a mean weight of 6 kg and 14 kg were below the European DRL whilst 25 kg, 44 kg and 60 kg patients exceeded the European Abdomen AP/PA DRL. The establishment of DRLs helps institutes identify potential areas of optimisation. As some of our GXR protocols exceed the European DRLs, the next step at our institute is to complete a multi-disciplinary image quality assessment to identify if it is possible to optimise these protocols.</p>","PeriodicalId":48490,"journal":{"name":"Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1015-1022"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Establishing facility reference levels and comparing to international diagnostic reference levels in paediatric general X-ray.\",\"authors\":\"Samuel M Lilli, Amanda A Perdomo\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13246-025-01563-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Diagnostic Reference Levels (DRLs) can be used to assess the radiation exposure for specific protocols and identify areas of potential optimisation. Despite paediatric general X-ray (GXR) being a relatively low dose modality, due to the high radiosensitivity of children, it is imperative that doses remain as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA). This study aims to compare our institute's Dose-Area-Product (DAP) to currently available local, national, and regional DRLs, as there are currently no Australian DRL values established for paediatric GXR. The DAPs for GXR protocols are recorded in a commercially available DMS software, MyXrayDose, which generates a report of the Facility Reference Levels (FRLs) for all GXR protocols. As MyXrayDose uses age categories, our FRLs were converted to weight-based FRLs using the 50th percentile values derived from the World Health Organisation and Centres for Disease Control Weight-for-age charts. These were compared to published DRLs from eleven different countries and regions of the world. Pelvis Anterior-Posterior (AP)/Posterior-Anterior (PA), Abdomen AP/PA, Thorax AP/PA and Thorax lateral protocols were compared to available national and regional DRLs. For example, from 1st July 2023-30th June 2024, 1008 Abdomen AP/PA X-rays were conducted in Room 1 with a fixed GXR unit. The FRL for 31.2-56.5 kg (10-15 years) patients in Room 1 (1093 mGy.cm<sup>2</sup>) was more than 2.3 times greater than the European DRL (475 mGy.cm<sup>2</sup>). The FRLs for patients with a mean weight of 6 kg and 14 kg were below the European DRL whilst 25 kg, 44 kg and 60 kg patients exceeded the European Abdomen AP/PA DRL. The establishment of DRLs helps institutes identify potential areas of optimisation. As some of our GXR protocols exceed the European DRLs, the next step at our institute is to complete a multi-disciplinary image quality assessment to identify if it is possible to optimise these protocols.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48490,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1015-1022\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-025-01563-9\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-025-01563-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
诊断参考水平(drl)可用于评估特定方案的辐射暴露,并确定可能优化的领域。尽管儿科普通x射线(GXR)是一种相对低剂量的方式,但由于儿童的高放射敏感性,剂量必须保持在合理可行的最低水平(ALARA)。本研究的目的是将我们研究所的剂量-面积-产品(DAP)与目前可用的地方、国家和地区DRL进行比较,因为目前澳大利亚还没有建立儿科GXR的DRL值。GXR协议的dap记录在市售的DMS软件MyXrayDose中,该软件生成所有GXR协议的设施参考水平(frl)报告。由于MyXrayDose使用年龄分类,我们的frl被转换为基于体重的frl,使用来自世界卫生组织和疾病控制中心年龄体重图表的第50百分位值。这些数据与世界上11个不同国家和地区发表的drl进行了比较。将骨盆前-后(AP)/后-前(PA)、腹部AP/PA、胸腔AP/PA和胸腔外侧方案与现有的国家和地区DRLs进行比较。例如,从2023年7月1日至2024年6月30日,在1号房间用固定的GXR装置进行了1008次腹部AP/PA x光检查。1号病房31.2-56.5 kg(10-15岁)患者的FRL (1093 mg / g .cm2)是欧洲DRL (475 mg / g .cm2)的2.3倍以上。平均体重为6 kg和14 kg的患者frl低于欧洲DRL,而25 kg、44 kg和60 kg的患者frl超过欧洲腹部AP/PA DRL。DRLs的建立有助于研究机构确定潜在的优化领域。由于我们的一些GXR协议超过了欧洲drl,我们研究所的下一步是完成多学科图像质量评估,以确定是否有可能优化这些协议。
Establishing facility reference levels and comparing to international diagnostic reference levels in paediatric general X-ray.
Diagnostic Reference Levels (DRLs) can be used to assess the radiation exposure for specific protocols and identify areas of potential optimisation. Despite paediatric general X-ray (GXR) being a relatively low dose modality, due to the high radiosensitivity of children, it is imperative that doses remain as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA). This study aims to compare our institute's Dose-Area-Product (DAP) to currently available local, national, and regional DRLs, as there are currently no Australian DRL values established for paediatric GXR. The DAPs for GXR protocols are recorded in a commercially available DMS software, MyXrayDose, which generates a report of the Facility Reference Levels (FRLs) for all GXR protocols. As MyXrayDose uses age categories, our FRLs were converted to weight-based FRLs using the 50th percentile values derived from the World Health Organisation and Centres for Disease Control Weight-for-age charts. These were compared to published DRLs from eleven different countries and regions of the world. Pelvis Anterior-Posterior (AP)/Posterior-Anterior (PA), Abdomen AP/PA, Thorax AP/PA and Thorax lateral protocols were compared to available national and regional DRLs. For example, from 1st July 2023-30th June 2024, 1008 Abdomen AP/PA X-rays were conducted in Room 1 with a fixed GXR unit. The FRL for 31.2-56.5 kg (10-15 years) patients in Room 1 (1093 mGy.cm2) was more than 2.3 times greater than the European DRL (475 mGy.cm2). The FRLs for patients with a mean weight of 6 kg and 14 kg were below the European DRL whilst 25 kg, 44 kg and 60 kg patients exceeded the European Abdomen AP/PA DRL. The establishment of DRLs helps institutes identify potential areas of optimisation. As some of our GXR protocols exceed the European DRLs, the next step at our institute is to complete a multi-disciplinary image quality assessment to identify if it is possible to optimise these protocols.