日本学术研究机构的多元角色与特征:基于问卷的研究结果。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICAL INFORMATICS
Reo Tanoshima, Riki Tanaka, Koji Hara, Hironori Fukuoka, Tatsuya Haze, Naoko Inagaki, Akifumi Ijuin, Manabu Nitta, Yusuke Kobayashi, Kozo Okada, Akito Nozaki, Etsuko Miyagi, Tetsuya Yamamoto, Takahisa Goto
{"title":"日本学术研究机构的多元角色与特征:基于问卷的研究结果。","authors":"Reo Tanoshima, Riki Tanaka, Koji Hara, Hironori Fukuoka, Tatsuya Haze, Naoko Inagaki, Akifumi Ijuin, Manabu Nitta, Yusuke Kobayashi, Kozo Okada, Akito Nozaki, Etsuko Miyagi, Tetsuya Yamamoto, Takahisa Goto","doi":"10.1007/s43441-025-00797-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clinical trials in Japan are governed by three regulations: Japanese Good Clinical Practice (J-GCP), the Clinical Trials Act, and the Ethical Guidelines for Medical and Biological Research Involving Human Subjects. Academic research organizations (AROs) are non-profit entities established to support clinician-scientists in conducting rigorous and high-quality clinical trials. However, Japan's unique decentralized clinical trial system has resulted in relatively small AROs with diverse roles. Additionally, work style reforms among Japanese physicians pose challenges for allocating time to research. This study aimed to assess the demographics, activities, and roles of AROs in Japan.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We distributed a questionnaire survey to 31 AROs in Japan between October and December 2023. The survey collected data on organizational mission, vision, annual planning, clinical trial support, the number of supported studies, financial independence, and management of researchers' working hours.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Responses were received from 20 AROs (64.5%), including five public university hospitals and two clinical research core hospitals. The median staff size was 26.7 (range: 2-80), with public university hospitals reporting a median of 22.6 (range: 1449). Y-NEXT had a larger staff size (53.4) compared with other public university hospitals but fewer than clinical research core hospitals (median: 78.5). Thirteen AROs (65.0%) reported having organizational missions, and 25.0% were financially independent. Effort allocation for staff varied among institutions, and six AROs (30.0%) managed researchers' working hours.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The roles and ultimate goals of AROs vary across institutions, highlighting the need for alignment with each institution's clinical research priorities and principles.</p>","PeriodicalId":23084,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science","volume":" ","pages":"1098-1106"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diverse Roles and Characteristics of Academic Research Organizations in Japan: Results of A Questionnaire-Based Study.\",\"authors\":\"Reo Tanoshima, Riki Tanaka, Koji Hara, Hironori Fukuoka, Tatsuya Haze, Naoko Inagaki, Akifumi Ijuin, Manabu Nitta, Yusuke Kobayashi, Kozo Okada, Akito Nozaki, Etsuko Miyagi, Tetsuya Yamamoto, Takahisa Goto\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s43441-025-00797-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clinical trials in Japan are governed by three regulations: Japanese Good Clinical Practice (J-GCP), the Clinical Trials Act, and the Ethical Guidelines for Medical and Biological Research Involving Human Subjects. Academic research organizations (AROs) are non-profit entities established to support clinician-scientists in conducting rigorous and high-quality clinical trials. However, Japan's unique decentralized clinical trial system has resulted in relatively small AROs with diverse roles. Additionally, work style reforms among Japanese physicians pose challenges for allocating time to research. This study aimed to assess the demographics, activities, and roles of AROs in Japan.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We distributed a questionnaire survey to 31 AROs in Japan between October and December 2023. The survey collected data on organizational mission, vision, annual planning, clinical trial support, the number of supported studies, financial independence, and management of researchers' working hours.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Responses were received from 20 AROs (64.5%), including five public university hospitals and two clinical research core hospitals. The median staff size was 26.7 (range: 2-80), with public university hospitals reporting a median of 22.6 (range: 1449). Y-NEXT had a larger staff size (53.4) compared with other public university hospitals but fewer than clinical research core hospitals (median: 78.5). Thirteen AROs (65.0%) reported having organizational missions, and 25.0% were financially independent. Effort allocation for staff varied among institutions, and six AROs (30.0%) managed researchers' working hours.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The roles and ultimate goals of AROs vary across institutions, highlighting the need for alignment with each institution's clinical research priorities and principles.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23084,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1098-1106\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43441-025-00797-9\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL INFORMATICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43441-025-00797-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:日本的临床试验受三个法规的约束:日本良好临床规范(J-GCP)、临床试验法案和涉及人体受试者的医学和生物学研究伦理准则。学术研究组织(AROs)是为支持临床科学家进行严格和高质量的临床试验而建立的非营利性实体。然而,日本独特的分散式临床试验制度导致了相对较小的AROs和不同的角色。此外,日本医生的工作方式改革给分配研究时间带来了挑战。本研究旨在评估日本AROs的人口统计、活动和角色。方法:于2023年10 - 12月对日本31家AROs进行问卷调查。调查收集了组织使命、愿景、年度规划、临床试验支持、支持的研究数量、财务独立性和研究人员工作时间管理等方面的数据。结果:共收到20家AROs(64.5%)的反馈,其中包括5家公立大学医院和2家临床研究核心医院。工作人员人数的中位数为26.7人(范围:2-80人),公立大学医院报告的中位数为22.6人(范围:1449人)。与其他公立大学医院相比,Y-NEXT的员工人数较多(53.4人),但少于临床研究核心医院(中位数:78.5人)。13个区域办事处(65.0%)报告有组织任务,25.0%在财政上独立。工作人员的工作分配因院校而异,有6个主任(30.0%)负责管理研究人员的工作时间。结论:AROs的作用和最终目标因机构而异,强调需要与每个机构的临床研究重点和原则保持一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Diverse Roles and Characteristics of Academic Research Organizations in Japan: Results of A Questionnaire-Based Study.

Background: Clinical trials in Japan are governed by three regulations: Japanese Good Clinical Practice (J-GCP), the Clinical Trials Act, and the Ethical Guidelines for Medical and Biological Research Involving Human Subjects. Academic research organizations (AROs) are non-profit entities established to support clinician-scientists in conducting rigorous and high-quality clinical trials. However, Japan's unique decentralized clinical trial system has resulted in relatively small AROs with diverse roles. Additionally, work style reforms among Japanese physicians pose challenges for allocating time to research. This study aimed to assess the demographics, activities, and roles of AROs in Japan.

Methods: We distributed a questionnaire survey to 31 AROs in Japan between October and December 2023. The survey collected data on organizational mission, vision, annual planning, clinical trial support, the number of supported studies, financial independence, and management of researchers' working hours.

Results: Responses were received from 20 AROs (64.5%), including five public university hospitals and two clinical research core hospitals. The median staff size was 26.7 (range: 2-80), with public university hospitals reporting a median of 22.6 (range: 1449). Y-NEXT had a larger staff size (53.4) compared with other public university hospitals but fewer than clinical research core hospitals (median: 78.5). Thirteen AROs (65.0%) reported having organizational missions, and 25.0% were financially independent. Effort allocation for staff varied among institutions, and six AROs (30.0%) managed researchers' working hours.

Conclusion: The roles and ultimate goals of AROs vary across institutions, highlighting the need for alignment with each institution's clinical research priorities and principles.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science MEDICAL INFORMATICS-PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
13.30%
发文量
127
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science (TIRS) is the official scientific journal of DIA that strives to advance medical product discovery, development, regulation, and use through the publication of peer-reviewed original and review articles, commentaries, and letters to the editor across the spectrum of converting biomedical science into practical solutions to advance human health. The focus areas of the journal are as follows: Biostatistics Clinical Trials Product Development and Innovation Global Perspectives Policy Regulatory Science Product Safety Special Populations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信