深度学习重建算法在超高分辨率CT胰腺囊性肿瘤诊断中的优势。

IF 2.1 4区 医学
Japanese Journal of Radiology Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-30 DOI:10.1007/s11604-025-01804-7
Keitaro Sofue, Yoshiko Ueno, Shinji Yabe, Eisuke Ueshima, Takeru Yamaguchi, Atsuhiro Masuda, Arata Sakai, Hirochika Toyama, Takumi Fukumoto, Masatoshi Hori, Takamichi Murakami
{"title":"深度学习重建算法在超高分辨率CT胰腺囊性肿瘤诊断中的优势。","authors":"Keitaro Sofue, Yoshiko Ueno, Shinji Yabe, Eisuke Ueshima, Takeru Yamaguchi, Atsuhiro Masuda, Arata Sakai, Hirochika Toyama, Takumi Fukumoto, Masatoshi Hori, Takamichi Murakami","doi":"10.1007/s11604-025-01804-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the image quality and clinical utility of a deep learning reconstruction (DLR) algorithm in ultra-high-resolution computed tomography (UHR-CT) for the diagnosis of pancreatic cystic neoplasms (PCNs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 45 patients with PCNs between March 2020 and February 2022. Contrast-enhanced UHR-CT images were obtained and reconstructed using DLR and hybrid iterative reconstruction (IR). Image noise and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were measured. Two radiologists assessed the diagnostic performance of the imaging findings associated with PCNs using a 5-point Likert scale. The diagnostic performance metrics, including sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), were calculated. Quantitative and qualitative features were compared between CT with DLR and hybrid IR. Interobserver agreement for qualitative assessments was also analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>DLR significantly reduced image noise and increased CNR compared to hybrid IR for all objects (p < 0.001). Radiologists rated DLR images as superior in overall quality, lesion delineation, and vessel conspicuity (p < 0.001). DLR produced higher AUROC values for diagnostic imaging findings (ductal communication: 0.887‒0.938 vs. 0.816‒0.827 and enhanced mural nodule: 0.843‒0.916 vs. 0.785‒0.801), although DLR did not directly improve sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy. Interobserver agreement for qualitative assessments was higher in CT with DLR (κ = 0.69‒0.82 vs. 0.57‒0.73).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>DLR improved image quality and diagnostic performance by effectively reducing image noise and improving lesion conspicuity in the diagnosis of PCNs on UHR-CT. The DLR demonstrated greater diagnostic confidence for the assessment of imaging findings associated with PCNs.</p>","PeriodicalId":14691,"journal":{"name":"Japanese Journal of Radiology","volume":" ","pages":"1652-1662"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12479652/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Advantages of deep learning reconstruction algorithm in ultra-high-resolution CT for the diagnosis of pancreatic cystic neoplasm.\",\"authors\":\"Keitaro Sofue, Yoshiko Ueno, Shinji Yabe, Eisuke Ueshima, Takeru Yamaguchi, Atsuhiro Masuda, Arata Sakai, Hirochika Toyama, Takumi Fukumoto, Masatoshi Hori, Takamichi Murakami\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11604-025-01804-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the image quality and clinical utility of a deep learning reconstruction (DLR) algorithm in ultra-high-resolution computed tomography (UHR-CT) for the diagnosis of pancreatic cystic neoplasms (PCNs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 45 patients with PCNs between March 2020 and February 2022. Contrast-enhanced UHR-CT images were obtained and reconstructed using DLR and hybrid iterative reconstruction (IR). Image noise and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were measured. Two radiologists assessed the diagnostic performance of the imaging findings associated with PCNs using a 5-point Likert scale. The diagnostic performance metrics, including sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), were calculated. Quantitative and qualitative features were compared between CT with DLR and hybrid IR. Interobserver agreement for qualitative assessments was also analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>DLR significantly reduced image noise and increased CNR compared to hybrid IR for all objects (p < 0.001). Radiologists rated DLR images as superior in overall quality, lesion delineation, and vessel conspicuity (p < 0.001). DLR produced higher AUROC values for diagnostic imaging findings (ductal communication: 0.887‒0.938 vs. 0.816‒0.827 and enhanced mural nodule: 0.843‒0.916 vs. 0.785‒0.801), although DLR did not directly improve sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy. Interobserver agreement for qualitative assessments was higher in CT with DLR (κ = 0.69‒0.82 vs. 0.57‒0.73).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>DLR improved image quality and diagnostic performance by effectively reducing image noise and improving lesion conspicuity in the diagnosis of PCNs on UHR-CT. The DLR demonstrated greater diagnostic confidence for the assessment of imaging findings associated with PCNs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14691,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Japanese Journal of Radiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1652-1662\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12479652/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Japanese Journal of Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-025-01804-7\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-025-01804-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在评估超高分辨率计算机断层扫描(UHR-CT)中深度学习重建(DLR)算法在胰腺囊性肿瘤(pcn)诊断中的图像质量和临床应用。方法:本回顾性研究纳入了2020年3月至2022年2月期间45例PCNs患者。采用DLR和混合迭代重建(IR)技术对增强后的UHR-CT图像进行重建。测量图像噪声和噪声比(CNR)。两名放射科医生使用5分李克特量表评估与pcn相关的影像学表现的诊断性能。计算诊断性能指标,包括敏感性、特异性和受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)。CT + DLR与混合IR的定性、定量特征比较。还分析了观察员间对定性评估的一致意见。结果:与混合红外相比,DLR在所有目标上均能显著降低图像噪声,提高CNR (p)。结论:DLR在UHR-CT上诊断PCNs时,可有效降低图像噪声,提高病变显著性,从而提高图像质量和诊断性能。DLR在评估与pcn相关的影像学表现方面表现出更高的诊断可信度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Advantages of deep learning reconstruction algorithm in ultra-high-resolution CT for the diagnosis of pancreatic cystic neoplasm.

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the image quality and clinical utility of a deep learning reconstruction (DLR) algorithm in ultra-high-resolution computed tomography (UHR-CT) for the diagnosis of pancreatic cystic neoplasms (PCNs).

Methods: This retrospective study included 45 patients with PCNs between March 2020 and February 2022. Contrast-enhanced UHR-CT images were obtained and reconstructed using DLR and hybrid iterative reconstruction (IR). Image noise and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were measured. Two radiologists assessed the diagnostic performance of the imaging findings associated with PCNs using a 5-point Likert scale. The diagnostic performance metrics, including sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), were calculated. Quantitative and qualitative features were compared between CT with DLR and hybrid IR. Interobserver agreement for qualitative assessments was also analyzed.

Results: DLR significantly reduced image noise and increased CNR compared to hybrid IR for all objects (p < 0.001). Radiologists rated DLR images as superior in overall quality, lesion delineation, and vessel conspicuity (p < 0.001). DLR produced higher AUROC values for diagnostic imaging findings (ductal communication: 0.887‒0.938 vs. 0.816‒0.827 and enhanced mural nodule: 0.843‒0.916 vs. 0.785‒0.801), although DLR did not directly improve sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy. Interobserver agreement for qualitative assessments was higher in CT with DLR (κ = 0.69‒0.82 vs. 0.57‒0.73).

Conclusion: DLR improved image quality and diagnostic performance by effectively reducing image noise and improving lesion conspicuity in the diagnosis of PCNs on UHR-CT. The DLR demonstrated greater diagnostic confidence for the assessment of imaging findings associated with PCNs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Japanese Journal of Radiology
Japanese Journal of Radiology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
自引率
4.80%
发文量
133
期刊介绍: Japanese Journal of Radiology is a peer-reviewed journal, officially published by the Japan Radiological Society. The main purpose of the journal is to provide a forum for the publication of papers documenting recent advances and new developments in the field of radiology in medicine and biology. The scope of Japanese Journal of Radiology encompasses but is not restricted to diagnostic radiology, interventional radiology, radiation oncology, nuclear medicine, radiation physics, and radiation biology. Additionally, the journal covers technical and industrial innovations. The journal welcomes original articles, technical notes, review articles, pictorial essays and letters to the editor. The journal also provides announcements from the boards and the committees of the society. Membership in the Japan Radiological Society is not a prerequisite for submission. Contributions are welcomed from all parts of the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信