前列腺放疗对转移性去势敏感前列腺癌患者生存结局的影响:一项随机3期临床试验的荟萃分析

IF 8.3 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Satı Coşkun Yazgan, Emre Yekedüz, Mutlay Sayan, Praful Ravi, Hatice Bölek, Rana R McKay, Serap Akyürek, Liselotte M S Boevé, Alberto Bossi, Nicholas D James, Karim Fizazi, Silke Gillessen, Toni K Choueiri, Yüksel Ürün
{"title":"前列腺放疗对转移性去势敏感前列腺癌患者生存结局的影响:一项随机3期临床试验的荟萃分析","authors":"Satı Coşkun Yazgan, Emre Yekedüz, Mutlay Sayan, Praful Ravi, Hatice Bölek, Rana R McKay, Serap Akyürek, Liselotte M S Boevé, Alberto Bossi, Nicholas D James, Karim Fizazi, Silke Gillessen, Toni K Choueiri, Yüksel Ürün","doi":"10.1016/j.euo.2025.05.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Despite advancements in systemic therapy for metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC), the survival benefits of radiotherapy (RT) remain uncertain. This meta-analysis evaluates whether addition of RT to the standard of care (SOC) improves radiographic progression-free (rPFS) and overall (OS) survival, with a focus on systemic therapy intensification.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A targeted review of three phase 3 trials (HORRAD, STAMPEDE, and PEACE-1) was conducted to assess the role of prostate RT in mCSPC. Two reviewers evaluated study quality, and a meta-analysis using a random-effect model (Review Manager v5.3) analyzed rPFS and OS as the primary outcomes (hazard ratio [HR] with 95% confidence interval [CI]). Subgroup analyses focused on low-volume disease as per the CHAARTED criteria, with heterogeneity assessed via I<sup>2</sup> and significance set at p < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Key findings and limitations: </strong>This meta-analysis of 3665 patients from HORRAD, STAMPEDE, and PEACE-1 found that addition of RT to SOC did not improve rPFS or OS in the overall mCSPC population. However, in low-volume disease, RT with SOC and abiraterone acetate (AA) improved rPFS significantly (HR = 0.65, 95% CI: 0.45-0.93; p = 0.02) without an OS benefit. Limitations include pooled data, patient heterogeneity, and variations in treatments and follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and clinical implications: </strong>Prostate RT does not improve rPFS or OS in the overall mCSPC population, but offers a significant rPFS benefit in low-volume disease when combined with SOC and AA. Although no OS improvement was observed, the synergy between AA and RT underscores the value of RT for carefully selected patients. Further prospective studies are needed to refine treatment strategies and improve outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":12256,"journal":{"name":"European urology oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Prostate Radiotherapy on Survival Outcomes in Patients with Metastatic Castration-sensitive Prostate Cancer: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Phase 3 Clinical Trials.\",\"authors\":\"Satı Coşkun Yazgan, Emre Yekedüz, Mutlay Sayan, Praful Ravi, Hatice Bölek, Rana R McKay, Serap Akyürek, Liselotte M S Boevé, Alberto Bossi, Nicholas D James, Karim Fizazi, Silke Gillessen, Toni K Choueiri, Yüksel Ürün\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.euo.2025.05.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Despite advancements in systemic therapy for metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC), the survival benefits of radiotherapy (RT) remain uncertain. This meta-analysis evaluates whether addition of RT to the standard of care (SOC) improves radiographic progression-free (rPFS) and overall (OS) survival, with a focus on systemic therapy intensification.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A targeted review of three phase 3 trials (HORRAD, STAMPEDE, and PEACE-1) was conducted to assess the role of prostate RT in mCSPC. Two reviewers evaluated study quality, and a meta-analysis using a random-effect model (Review Manager v5.3) analyzed rPFS and OS as the primary outcomes (hazard ratio [HR] with 95% confidence interval [CI]). Subgroup analyses focused on low-volume disease as per the CHAARTED criteria, with heterogeneity assessed via I<sup>2</sup> and significance set at p < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Key findings and limitations: </strong>This meta-analysis of 3665 patients from HORRAD, STAMPEDE, and PEACE-1 found that addition of RT to SOC did not improve rPFS or OS in the overall mCSPC population. However, in low-volume disease, RT with SOC and abiraterone acetate (AA) improved rPFS significantly (HR = 0.65, 95% CI: 0.45-0.93; p = 0.02) without an OS benefit. Limitations include pooled data, patient heterogeneity, and variations in treatments and follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and clinical implications: </strong>Prostate RT does not improve rPFS or OS in the overall mCSPC population, but offers a significant rPFS benefit in low-volume disease when combined with SOC and AA. Although no OS improvement was observed, the synergy between AA and RT underscores the value of RT for carefully selected patients. Further prospective studies are needed to refine treatment strategies and improve outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12256,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European urology oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European urology oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2025.05.003\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European urology oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2025.05.003","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景与目的:尽管转移性去势敏感前列腺癌(mCSPC)的全身治疗取得了进展,但放疗(RT)的生存益处仍不确定。该荟萃分析评估了在标准治疗(SOC)中加入RT是否能改善放射学无进展(rPFS)和总体(OS)生存,重点是全身治疗强化。方法:对三个3期试验(HORRAD、STAMPEDE和PEACE-1)进行了有针对性的回顾,以评估前列腺RT在mCSPC中的作用。两名评论者评估了研究质量,使用随机效应模型(Review Manager v5.3)的荟萃分析分析了rPFS和OS作为主要结局(风险比[HR]和95%置信区间[CI])。根据charted标准,亚组分析集中在小体积疾病上,异质性通过I2评估,显著性设定为p。主要发现和局限性:这项对来自HORRAD、STAMPEDE和和平-1的3665例患者的荟荟性分析发现,在整体mCSPC人群中,在SOC基础上添加RT并没有改善rPFS或OS。然而,在小体积疾病中,SOC和醋酸阿比特龙(AA)联合RT可显著改善rPFS (HR = 0.65, 95% CI: 0.45-0.93;p = 0.02),没有操作系统的好处。局限性包括合并数据、患者异质性、治疗和随访的差异。结论和临床意义:前列腺RT不能改善整体mCSPC人群的rPFS或OS,但当与SOC和AA联合使用时,可显著改善小容量疾病的rPFS。虽然没有观察到OS改善,但AA和RT之间的协同作用强调了RT对精心挑选的患者的价值。需要进一步的前瞻性研究来完善治疗策略和改善结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of Prostate Radiotherapy on Survival Outcomes in Patients with Metastatic Castration-sensitive Prostate Cancer: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Phase 3 Clinical Trials.

Background and objective: Despite advancements in systemic therapy for metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC), the survival benefits of radiotherapy (RT) remain uncertain. This meta-analysis evaluates whether addition of RT to the standard of care (SOC) improves radiographic progression-free (rPFS) and overall (OS) survival, with a focus on systemic therapy intensification.

Methods: A targeted review of three phase 3 trials (HORRAD, STAMPEDE, and PEACE-1) was conducted to assess the role of prostate RT in mCSPC. Two reviewers evaluated study quality, and a meta-analysis using a random-effect model (Review Manager v5.3) analyzed rPFS and OS as the primary outcomes (hazard ratio [HR] with 95% confidence interval [CI]). Subgroup analyses focused on low-volume disease as per the CHAARTED criteria, with heterogeneity assessed via I2 and significance set at p < 0.05.

Key findings and limitations: This meta-analysis of 3665 patients from HORRAD, STAMPEDE, and PEACE-1 found that addition of RT to SOC did not improve rPFS or OS in the overall mCSPC population. However, in low-volume disease, RT with SOC and abiraterone acetate (AA) improved rPFS significantly (HR = 0.65, 95% CI: 0.45-0.93; p = 0.02) without an OS benefit. Limitations include pooled data, patient heterogeneity, and variations in treatments and follow-up.

Conclusions and clinical implications: Prostate RT does not improve rPFS or OS in the overall mCSPC population, but offers a significant rPFS benefit in low-volume disease when combined with SOC and AA. Although no OS improvement was observed, the synergy between AA and RT underscores the value of RT for carefully selected patients. Further prospective studies are needed to refine treatment strategies and improve outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.50
自引率
2.40%
发文量
128
审稿时长
20 days
期刊介绍: Journal Name: European Urology Oncology Affiliation: Official Journal of the European Association of Urology Focus: First official publication of the EAU fully devoted to the study of genitourinary malignancies Aims to deliver high-quality research Content: Includes original articles, opinion piece editorials, and invited reviews Covers clinical, basic, and translational research Publication Frequency: Six times a year in electronic format
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信