Kyoung Jin Kim, Seol A Jang, Su Jin Kwon, Gi Hyeon Seo, Kyoung Min Kim
{"title":"骨质疏松患者使用Denosumab或Alendronate治疗2型糖尿病风险的比较:一项全国性队列研究","authors":"Kyoung Jin Kim, Seol A Jang, Su Jin Kwon, Gi Hyeon Seo, Kyoung Min Kim","doi":"10.1007/s00223-025-01385-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Recent studies have suggested potential metabolic effects of anti-osteoporotic medications, but their impact on type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) risk remains unclear. This study investigated the incidence of T2D in patients with osteoporosis treated with denosumab or alendronate. Using the Korean Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service database, we identified 316,026 patients who received either denosumab or alendronate between October 2017 and June 2022. After 1:3 propensity score matching, 1136 denosumab users and 3303 alendronate users were included. The primary outcome was incident T2D, defined as a new diagnosis followed by an antidiabetic medication prescription within six months. Over a median follow-up of 4.7 years, 57 (5.0%) denosumab users and 196 (5.9%) alendronate users developed T2D, with incidence rates of 10.7 and 12.4 per 1000 person-years, respectively. Denosumab use was not significantly associated with reduced T2D risk (hazard ratio [HR] 0.86, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.64-1.15). Additional adjustment for chronic kidney disease and fractures during follow-up yielded an HR of 0.84 (95% CI 0.62-1.13; P = 0.25). Fine-Gray competing risk analysis considering death produced similar results (HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.62-1.13; P = 0.24). Subgroup analyses showed consistent findings across sex, age groups, comorbidities, and concurrent medication use. These findings suggest no significant difference in T2D risk between denosumab and alendronate users in osteoporosis patients. Both medications appear to have comparable metabolic effects. Further large-scale studies with longer follow-up are warranted to clarify the long-term impact of osteoporosis treatments on diabetes risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":9601,"journal":{"name":"Calcified Tissue International","volume":"116 1","pages":"78"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Type 2 Diabetes Risk in Osteoporosis Patients Treated with Denosumab or Alendronate: A Nationwide Cohort Study.\",\"authors\":\"Kyoung Jin Kim, Seol A Jang, Su Jin Kwon, Gi Hyeon Seo, Kyoung Min Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00223-025-01385-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Recent studies have suggested potential metabolic effects of anti-osteoporotic medications, but their impact on type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) risk remains unclear. This study investigated the incidence of T2D in patients with osteoporosis treated with denosumab or alendronate. Using the Korean Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service database, we identified 316,026 patients who received either denosumab or alendronate between October 2017 and June 2022. After 1:3 propensity score matching, 1136 denosumab users and 3303 alendronate users were included. The primary outcome was incident T2D, defined as a new diagnosis followed by an antidiabetic medication prescription within six months. Over a median follow-up of 4.7 years, 57 (5.0%) denosumab users and 196 (5.9%) alendronate users developed T2D, with incidence rates of 10.7 and 12.4 per 1000 person-years, respectively. Denosumab use was not significantly associated with reduced T2D risk (hazard ratio [HR] 0.86, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.64-1.15). Additional adjustment for chronic kidney disease and fractures during follow-up yielded an HR of 0.84 (95% CI 0.62-1.13; P = 0.25). Fine-Gray competing risk analysis considering death produced similar results (HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.62-1.13; P = 0.24). Subgroup analyses showed consistent findings across sex, age groups, comorbidities, and concurrent medication use. These findings suggest no significant difference in T2D risk between denosumab and alendronate users in osteoporosis patients. Both medications appear to have comparable metabolic effects. Further large-scale studies with longer follow-up are warranted to clarify the long-term impact of osteoporosis treatments on diabetes risk.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9601,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Calcified Tissue International\",\"volume\":\"116 1\",\"pages\":\"78\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Calcified Tissue International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00223-025-01385-7\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Calcified Tissue International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00223-025-01385-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
最近的研究表明抗骨质疏松药物具有潜在的代谢作用,但它们对2型糖尿病(T2D)风险的影响尚不清楚。本研究调查了使用地苏单抗或阿仑膦酸钠治疗的骨质疏松症患者T2D的发生率。使用韩国健康保险审查和评估服务数据库,我们确定了2017年10月至2022年6月期间接受denosumab或阿仑膦酸钠治疗的316,026例患者。经1:3倾向评分匹配后,纳入了1136名denosumab使用者和3303名alendronate使用者。主要结局是T2D的发生,定义为新诊断后6个月内服用降糖药物。在中位4.7年的随访中,57名(5.0%)denosumab使用者和196名(5.9%)阿仑膦酸钠使用者发生T2D,发病率分别为每1000人年10.7和12.4例。使用Denosumab与降低T2D风险无显著相关性(风险比[HR] 0.86, 95%可信区间[CI] 0.64-1.15)。随访期间对慢性肾脏疾病和骨折进行额外调整的风险比为0.84 (95% CI 0.62-1.13;p = 0.25)。考虑死亡的细灰色竞争风险分析也产生了类似的结果(HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.62-1.13;p = 0.24)。亚组分析显示了跨性别、年龄组、合并症和同时用药的一致结果。这些发现表明,在骨质疏松症患者中,denosumab和阿仑膦酸钠使用者之间的T2D风险无显著差异。这两种药物似乎具有相当的代谢作用。为了阐明骨质疏松治疗对糖尿病风险的长期影响,需要进一步的大规模随访研究。
Comparison of Type 2 Diabetes Risk in Osteoporosis Patients Treated with Denosumab or Alendronate: A Nationwide Cohort Study.
Recent studies have suggested potential metabolic effects of anti-osteoporotic medications, but their impact on type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) risk remains unclear. This study investigated the incidence of T2D in patients with osteoporosis treated with denosumab or alendronate. Using the Korean Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service database, we identified 316,026 patients who received either denosumab or alendronate between October 2017 and June 2022. After 1:3 propensity score matching, 1136 denosumab users and 3303 alendronate users were included. The primary outcome was incident T2D, defined as a new diagnosis followed by an antidiabetic medication prescription within six months. Over a median follow-up of 4.7 years, 57 (5.0%) denosumab users and 196 (5.9%) alendronate users developed T2D, with incidence rates of 10.7 and 12.4 per 1000 person-years, respectively. Denosumab use was not significantly associated with reduced T2D risk (hazard ratio [HR] 0.86, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.64-1.15). Additional adjustment for chronic kidney disease and fractures during follow-up yielded an HR of 0.84 (95% CI 0.62-1.13; P = 0.25). Fine-Gray competing risk analysis considering death produced similar results (HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.62-1.13; P = 0.24). Subgroup analyses showed consistent findings across sex, age groups, comorbidities, and concurrent medication use. These findings suggest no significant difference in T2D risk between denosumab and alendronate users in osteoporosis patients. Both medications appear to have comparable metabolic effects. Further large-scale studies with longer follow-up are warranted to clarify the long-term impact of osteoporosis treatments on diabetes risk.
期刊介绍:
Calcified Tissue International and Musculoskeletal Research publishes original research and reviews concerning the structure and function of bone, and other musculoskeletal tissues in living organisms and clinical studies of musculoskeletal disease. It includes studies of cell biology, molecular biology, intracellular signalling, and physiology, as well as research into the hormones, cytokines and other mediators that influence the musculoskeletal system. The journal also publishes clinical studies of relevance to bone disease, mineral metabolism, muscle function, and musculoskeletal interactions.