巴基斯坦卡拉奇不同医院对妊娠期糖尿病妇女的护理质量评估。

IF 1.3 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Javeria Mansoor, Shafaq Alvi, Romaina Iqbal, Narjis Rizvi, Sabahat Naz
{"title":"巴基斯坦卡拉奇不同医院对妊娠期糖尿病妇女的护理质量评估。","authors":"Javeria Mansoor, Shafaq Alvi, Romaina Iqbal, Narjis Rizvi, Sabahat Naz","doi":"10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003362","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Since gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) prevalence is increasing in Pakistan, the quality of care provided to women with GDM is crucial for improving maternal and neonatal outcomes. Therefore, our study aimed to assess the quality of existing healthcare services related to GDM management across different hospitals in Karachi, Pakistan.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used Donabedian's model to evaluate the input, process and output phases. The first two phases were assessed through a cross-sectional design, while the output was evaluated via in-depth interviews. The study included six hospitals, one public and five private. We interviewed department heads (n=6) to assess the workforce and facilities (input) and nurses (n=17) and doctors (n=8) to examine qualifications for GDM management protocols (process). The output phase involved interviewing postpartum women with GDM (n=6) about their understanding of GDM, its complications and lifestyle modifications. We report frequencies and percentages for quantitative and thematic analysis for qualitative data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Monthly, 9000 women sought antenatal care (ANC) services, with 500 deliveries in public hospitals, while 2000-5500 sought ANC services, with 160-461 deliveries in private hospitals. All hospitals, except the public one, had standard GDM protocols. Three hospitals had neonatal intensive care units, six employed an endocrinologist, three had a dietician and only one appointed nursing staff as GDM counsellors. Two hospitals provided blood glucose monitoring charts, three offered diet charts and five gave breastfeeding instructions. While all doctors attended GDM education, no nurses participated. Thematic analysis highlighted postpartum women's lack of knowledge about GDM, its complications and the importance of lifestyle modification postdelivery.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study identified gaps in GDM care and highlighted the need for policies to develop and implement standardised GDM screening and management protocols, ensure mandatory training for healthcare providers and integrate multilingual educational material in healthcare settings to improve health outcomes for mothers and children.</p>","PeriodicalId":9052,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Quality","volume":"14 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12128405/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of the quality of care provided to women with gestational diabetes mellitus by different hospitals in Karachi, Pakistan.\",\"authors\":\"Javeria Mansoor, Shafaq Alvi, Romaina Iqbal, Narjis Rizvi, Sabahat Naz\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003362\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Since gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) prevalence is increasing in Pakistan, the quality of care provided to women with GDM is crucial for improving maternal and neonatal outcomes. Therefore, our study aimed to assess the quality of existing healthcare services related to GDM management across different hospitals in Karachi, Pakistan.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used Donabedian's model to evaluate the input, process and output phases. The first two phases were assessed through a cross-sectional design, while the output was evaluated via in-depth interviews. The study included six hospitals, one public and five private. We interviewed department heads (n=6) to assess the workforce and facilities (input) and nurses (n=17) and doctors (n=8) to examine qualifications for GDM management protocols (process). The output phase involved interviewing postpartum women with GDM (n=6) about their understanding of GDM, its complications and lifestyle modifications. We report frequencies and percentages for quantitative and thematic analysis for qualitative data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Monthly, 9000 women sought antenatal care (ANC) services, with 500 deliveries in public hospitals, while 2000-5500 sought ANC services, with 160-461 deliveries in private hospitals. All hospitals, except the public one, had standard GDM protocols. Three hospitals had neonatal intensive care units, six employed an endocrinologist, three had a dietician and only one appointed nursing staff as GDM counsellors. Two hospitals provided blood glucose monitoring charts, three offered diet charts and five gave breastfeeding instructions. While all doctors attended GDM education, no nurses participated. Thematic analysis highlighted postpartum women's lack of knowledge about GDM, its complications and the importance of lifestyle modification postdelivery.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study identified gaps in GDM care and highlighted the need for policies to develop and implement standardised GDM screening and management protocols, ensure mandatory training for healthcare providers and integrate multilingual educational material in healthcare settings to improve health outcomes for mothers and children.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9052,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Open Quality\",\"volume\":\"14 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12128405/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Open Quality\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003362\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Quality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003362","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:由于巴基斯坦的妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)患病率正在上升,因此为妊娠期糖尿病妇女提供的护理质量对于改善孕产妇和新生儿结局至关重要。因此,我们的研究旨在评估巴基斯坦卡拉奇不同医院与GDM管理相关的现有医疗服务质量。方法:采用Donabedian模型对输入、过程和输出三个阶段进行评价。前两个阶段通过横断面设计进行评估,而输出通过深度访谈进行评估。该研究包括六家医院,一家公立医院和五家私立医院。我们采访了科室负责人(n=6)来评估劳动力和设施(输入),护士(n=17)和医生(n=8)来检查GDM管理方案(过程)的资格。输出阶段包括采访产后GDM妇女(n=6),了解她们对GDM的理解、并发症和生活方式的改变。我们报告频率和百分比用于定量和专题分析用于定性数据。结果:每月有9000名妇女寻求产前保健服务,其中500人在公立医院分娩,2000-5500名妇女寻求产前保健服务,160-461名妇女在私立医院分娩。所有医院,除了公立医院,都有标准的GDM协议。三家医院设有新生儿重症监护室,六家医院聘用了内分泌学家,三家医院聘用了营养师,只有一家医院任命了护理人员作为新生儿糖尿病咨询师。两家医院提供血糖监测图表,三家提供饮食图表,五家提供母乳喂养指导。所有的医生都参加了GDM教育,没有护士参加。专题分析强调了产后妇女对GDM及其并发症缺乏了解以及产后改变生活方式的重要性。结论:我们的研究确定了GDM护理方面的差距,并强调了制定和实施标准化GDM筛查和管理协议的政策的必要性,确保对医疗保健提供者进行强制性培训,并在医疗保健机构中整合多语言教育材料,以改善母亲和儿童的健康结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessment of the quality of care provided to women with gestational diabetes mellitus by different hospitals in Karachi, Pakistan.

Background: Since gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) prevalence is increasing in Pakistan, the quality of care provided to women with GDM is crucial for improving maternal and neonatal outcomes. Therefore, our study aimed to assess the quality of existing healthcare services related to GDM management across different hospitals in Karachi, Pakistan.

Methods: We used Donabedian's model to evaluate the input, process and output phases. The first two phases were assessed through a cross-sectional design, while the output was evaluated via in-depth interviews. The study included six hospitals, one public and five private. We interviewed department heads (n=6) to assess the workforce and facilities (input) and nurses (n=17) and doctors (n=8) to examine qualifications for GDM management protocols (process). The output phase involved interviewing postpartum women with GDM (n=6) about their understanding of GDM, its complications and lifestyle modifications. We report frequencies and percentages for quantitative and thematic analysis for qualitative data.

Results: Monthly, 9000 women sought antenatal care (ANC) services, with 500 deliveries in public hospitals, while 2000-5500 sought ANC services, with 160-461 deliveries in private hospitals. All hospitals, except the public one, had standard GDM protocols. Three hospitals had neonatal intensive care units, six employed an endocrinologist, three had a dietician and only one appointed nursing staff as GDM counsellors. Two hospitals provided blood glucose monitoring charts, three offered diet charts and five gave breastfeeding instructions. While all doctors attended GDM education, no nurses participated. Thematic analysis highlighted postpartum women's lack of knowledge about GDM, its complications and the importance of lifestyle modification postdelivery.

Conclusion: Our study identified gaps in GDM care and highlighted the need for policies to develop and implement standardised GDM screening and management protocols, ensure mandatory training for healthcare providers and integrate multilingual educational material in healthcare settings to improve health outcomes for mothers and children.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Open Quality
BMJ Open Quality Nursing-Leadership and Management
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
226
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信