膝神经阻滞与皮质类固醇治疗慢性膝关节疼痛:患者报告的结果跨越9年的实践

Mingda Chen , Sercan Tosun , Nicolas R. Thompson , Kush K. Goyal
{"title":"膝神经阻滞与皮质类固醇治疗慢性膝关节疼痛:患者报告的结果跨越9年的实践","authors":"Mingda Chen ,&nbsp;Sercan Tosun ,&nbsp;Nicolas R. Thompson ,&nbsp;Kush K. Goyal","doi":"10.1016/j.inpm.2025.100601","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Genicular nerve blocks (GNB) for knee pain secondary to osteoarthritis (OA) are often performed with an anesthetic only, but corticosteroid can be used as an adjuvant with the goal of extending therapeutic relief. The efficacy of GNB with corticosteroid has been established in small, randomized trials, but its effectiveness in practice remains largely unknown.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Evaluate the therapeutic effect of GNB with corticosteroid using patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in a large patient sample.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Data from consecutive GNBs with corticosteroid performed at an academic medical center from 2015 to 2024 was collected retrospectively. We included all patients aged ≥18 who received a GNB with corticosteroid for chronic knee pain due to OA, and excluded diagnostic GNBs with anesthetic alone and procedures performed using non-classical/modified techniques. Comparisons between pre-versus post-procedure PROs were by mixed-effect regression models with multiple testing corrections.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 123 GNBs (96 patients) with corticosteroid were identified. Post-procedurally, the mean NRS reductions were 3.56 (2–30 days), 2.14 (1–3 months), 1.92 (3–6 months), and 1.23 (6–12 months). 50 % of the patients maintained a pain reduction greater than or equal to the NRS MCID of −2.0 for at least 6.9 months. Post-procedure improvements in PROMIS-GH and PHQ9 were not clinically significant. Mean time to total knee arthroplasty was 16.5 months in 13.5 % of patients (13/96). For active opioid users, opioid usage was significantly decreased from the baseline 28.01 ± 13.20 MME/day to 13.58 ± 16.23 MME/day (p &lt; 0.002) in the first 6 months post-GNB, and this opioid reduction was maintained at 15.59 ± 12.51 MME/day (p &lt; 0.05) after the initial 6-month follow-up period.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>For the majority of patients who received GNB with corticosteroid, we observed statistically and clinically significant pain reduction for 3 months or more in this cohort. While more comparative studies are required to evaluate its effectiveness, GNB with corticosteroid has promising potential as a safe and effective treatment for chronic knee pain.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100727,"journal":{"name":"Interventional Pain Medicine","volume":"4 2","pages":"Article 100601"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Genicular nerve block with corticosteroid for chronic knee Pain: Patient-Reported outcomes across 9-years of practice\",\"authors\":\"Mingda Chen ,&nbsp;Sercan Tosun ,&nbsp;Nicolas R. Thompson ,&nbsp;Kush K. Goyal\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.inpm.2025.100601\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Genicular nerve blocks (GNB) for knee pain secondary to osteoarthritis (OA) are often performed with an anesthetic only, but corticosteroid can be used as an adjuvant with the goal of extending therapeutic relief. The efficacy of GNB with corticosteroid has been established in small, randomized trials, but its effectiveness in practice remains largely unknown.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Evaluate the therapeutic effect of GNB with corticosteroid using patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in a large patient sample.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Data from consecutive GNBs with corticosteroid performed at an academic medical center from 2015 to 2024 was collected retrospectively. We included all patients aged ≥18 who received a GNB with corticosteroid for chronic knee pain due to OA, and excluded diagnostic GNBs with anesthetic alone and procedures performed using non-classical/modified techniques. Comparisons between pre-versus post-procedure PROs were by mixed-effect regression models with multiple testing corrections.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 123 GNBs (96 patients) with corticosteroid were identified. Post-procedurally, the mean NRS reductions were 3.56 (2–30 days), 2.14 (1–3 months), 1.92 (3–6 months), and 1.23 (6–12 months). 50 % of the patients maintained a pain reduction greater than or equal to the NRS MCID of −2.0 for at least 6.9 months. Post-procedure improvements in PROMIS-GH and PHQ9 were not clinically significant. Mean time to total knee arthroplasty was 16.5 months in 13.5 % of patients (13/96). For active opioid users, opioid usage was significantly decreased from the baseline 28.01 ± 13.20 MME/day to 13.58 ± 16.23 MME/day (p &lt; 0.002) in the first 6 months post-GNB, and this opioid reduction was maintained at 15.59 ± 12.51 MME/day (p &lt; 0.05) after the initial 6-month follow-up period.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>For the majority of patients who received GNB with corticosteroid, we observed statistically and clinically significant pain reduction for 3 months or more in this cohort. While more comparative studies are required to evaluate its effectiveness, GNB with corticosteroid has promising potential as a safe and effective treatment for chronic knee pain.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100727,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Interventional Pain Medicine\",\"volume\":\"4 2\",\"pages\":\"Article 100601\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Interventional Pain Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772594425000627\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interventional Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772594425000627","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:膝神经阻滞(GNB)治疗继发性骨关节炎(OA)的膝关节疼痛通常只在麻醉剂的情况下进行,但皮质类固醇可以作为辅助治疗,目的是延长治疗缓解。GNB与皮质类固醇的疗效已在小型随机试验中得到证实,但其在实践中的有效性在很大程度上仍然未知。目的在大量患者样本中,采用患者报告结局(pro)评估GNB与皮质类固醇的治疗效果。方法回顾性收集2015 - 2024年在某学术医疗中心连续行gnb皮质类固醇治疗的数据。我们纳入了所有年龄≥18岁、接受GNB联合皮质类固醇治疗OA引起的慢性膝关节疼痛的患者,排除了单独使用麻醉剂和使用非经典/改良技术进行手术的诊断性GNB。采用多重检验修正的混合效应回归模型比较手术前后的PROs。结果共鉴定出123例gnb(96例)使用皮质类固醇。术后NRS平均降低3.56(2-30天)、2.14(1-3个月)、1.92(3-6个月)和1.23(6-12个月)。50%的患者在至少6.9个月的时间内保持疼痛减轻大于或等于NRS MCID - 2.0。术后promise - gh和PHQ9的改善无临床意义。13.5%的患者(13/96)平均到全膝关节置换术的时间为16.5个月。对于活跃的阿片类药物使用者,阿片类药物使用量从基线的28.01±13.20 MME/天显著下降到13.58±16.23 MME/天(p <;0.002),阿片类药物减少维持在15.59±12.51 MME/天(p <;0.05)。结论:对于大多数接受GNB和皮质类固醇治疗的患者,我们在该队列中观察到3个月或更长时间的统计学和临床显著的疼痛减轻。虽然需要更多的比较研究来评估其有效性,但GNB与皮质类固醇作为一种安全有效的治疗慢性膝关节疼痛的方法有很大的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Genicular nerve block with corticosteroid for chronic knee Pain: Patient-Reported outcomes across 9-years of practice

Background

Genicular nerve blocks (GNB) for knee pain secondary to osteoarthritis (OA) are often performed with an anesthetic only, but corticosteroid can be used as an adjuvant with the goal of extending therapeutic relief. The efficacy of GNB with corticosteroid has been established in small, randomized trials, but its effectiveness in practice remains largely unknown.

Objectives

Evaluate the therapeutic effect of GNB with corticosteroid using patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in a large patient sample.

Methods

Data from consecutive GNBs with corticosteroid performed at an academic medical center from 2015 to 2024 was collected retrospectively. We included all patients aged ≥18 who received a GNB with corticosteroid for chronic knee pain due to OA, and excluded diagnostic GNBs with anesthetic alone and procedures performed using non-classical/modified techniques. Comparisons between pre-versus post-procedure PROs were by mixed-effect regression models with multiple testing corrections.

Results

A total of 123 GNBs (96 patients) with corticosteroid were identified. Post-procedurally, the mean NRS reductions were 3.56 (2–30 days), 2.14 (1–3 months), 1.92 (3–6 months), and 1.23 (6–12 months). 50 % of the patients maintained a pain reduction greater than or equal to the NRS MCID of −2.0 for at least 6.9 months. Post-procedure improvements in PROMIS-GH and PHQ9 were not clinically significant. Mean time to total knee arthroplasty was 16.5 months in 13.5 % of patients (13/96). For active opioid users, opioid usage was significantly decreased from the baseline 28.01 ± 13.20 MME/day to 13.58 ± 16.23 MME/day (p < 0.002) in the first 6 months post-GNB, and this opioid reduction was maintained at 15.59 ± 12.51 MME/day (p < 0.05) after the initial 6-month follow-up period.

Conclusion

For the majority of patients who received GNB with corticosteroid, we observed statistically and clinically significant pain reduction for 3 months or more in this cohort. While more comparative studies are required to evaluate its effectiveness, GNB with corticosteroid has promising potential as a safe and effective treatment for chronic knee pain.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信