Mimansa Sinha , Sanchita Paul , Mili Ghosh Nee Lala
{"title":"以ResNet为骨干的掩膜R-CNN和U-Net架构月球陨石坑探测的对比分析","authors":"Mimansa Sinha , Sanchita Paul , Mili Ghosh Nee Lala","doi":"10.1016/j.pss.2025.106140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Automated detection of lunar craters is crucial for advancing planetary science, enabling efficient geological mapping, surface age estimation, and resource identification. This study compares Mask R-CNN (instance segmentation) and U-Net (semantic segmentation) architectures using ResNet as the backbone for lunar crater detection. Key novelty is comparing model performance in both a Geospatial context (ArcGIS Pro environment) and non-Geospatial environment a method not heretofore attempted. Training and validation were conducted using Geocoded Chandrayaan-2 TMC-2 DEM data, employing a new strategy that facilitates accurate localization and precise detection of small, morphologically complex craters. Mask R-CNN achieved a precision of 91 %, a recall of 85 %, and an Intersection over Union (IoU) of 87 %, excelling in detecting intricate crater edges and identifying crater diameters with accurate geolocation information. However, it struggled to detect craters with less depth or degraded rims. Conversely, U-Net demonstrated superior recall (93 %) but moderate precision (85 %), making it efficient for broader crater localization tasks. U-Net excelled at identifying perfectly shaped craters but faced challenges in detecting larger and very small craters. Mask R-CNN identified previously uncatalogued craters, particularly those smaller than 1 km in diameter, while U-Net excelled at detecting a greater number of overlapping and nested craters, showcasing their complementary strengths. These findings underscore the potential of deep learning to enhance lunar research and future planetary exploration.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20054,"journal":{"name":"Planetary and Space Science","volume":"264 ","pages":"Article 106140"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative analysis of mask R-CNN and U-Net architectures using ResNet as backbone for lunar crater detection\",\"authors\":\"Mimansa Sinha , Sanchita Paul , Mili Ghosh Nee Lala\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.pss.2025.106140\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Automated detection of lunar craters is crucial for advancing planetary science, enabling efficient geological mapping, surface age estimation, and resource identification. This study compares Mask R-CNN (instance segmentation) and U-Net (semantic segmentation) architectures using ResNet as the backbone for lunar crater detection. Key novelty is comparing model performance in both a Geospatial context (ArcGIS Pro environment) and non-Geospatial environment a method not heretofore attempted. Training and validation were conducted using Geocoded Chandrayaan-2 TMC-2 DEM data, employing a new strategy that facilitates accurate localization and precise detection of small, morphologically complex craters. Mask R-CNN achieved a precision of 91 %, a recall of 85 %, and an Intersection over Union (IoU) of 87 %, excelling in detecting intricate crater edges and identifying crater diameters with accurate geolocation information. However, it struggled to detect craters with less depth or degraded rims. Conversely, U-Net demonstrated superior recall (93 %) but moderate precision (85 %), making it efficient for broader crater localization tasks. U-Net excelled at identifying perfectly shaped craters but faced challenges in detecting larger and very small craters. Mask R-CNN identified previously uncatalogued craters, particularly those smaller than 1 km in diameter, while U-Net excelled at detecting a greater number of overlapping and nested craters, showcasing their complementary strengths. These findings underscore the potential of deep learning to enhance lunar research and future planetary exploration.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20054,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Planetary and Space Science\",\"volume\":\"264 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106140\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Planetary and Space Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"101\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0032063325001072\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"物理与天体物理\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Planetary and Space Science","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0032063325001072","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparative analysis of mask R-CNN and U-Net architectures using ResNet as backbone for lunar crater detection
Automated detection of lunar craters is crucial for advancing planetary science, enabling efficient geological mapping, surface age estimation, and resource identification. This study compares Mask R-CNN (instance segmentation) and U-Net (semantic segmentation) architectures using ResNet as the backbone for lunar crater detection. Key novelty is comparing model performance in both a Geospatial context (ArcGIS Pro environment) and non-Geospatial environment a method not heretofore attempted. Training and validation were conducted using Geocoded Chandrayaan-2 TMC-2 DEM data, employing a new strategy that facilitates accurate localization and precise detection of small, morphologically complex craters. Mask R-CNN achieved a precision of 91 %, a recall of 85 %, and an Intersection over Union (IoU) of 87 %, excelling in detecting intricate crater edges and identifying crater diameters with accurate geolocation information. However, it struggled to detect craters with less depth or degraded rims. Conversely, U-Net demonstrated superior recall (93 %) but moderate precision (85 %), making it efficient for broader crater localization tasks. U-Net excelled at identifying perfectly shaped craters but faced challenges in detecting larger and very small craters. Mask R-CNN identified previously uncatalogued craters, particularly those smaller than 1 km in diameter, while U-Net excelled at detecting a greater number of overlapping and nested craters, showcasing their complementary strengths. These findings underscore the potential of deep learning to enhance lunar research and future planetary exploration.
期刊介绍:
Planetary and Space Science publishes original articles as well as short communications (letters). Ground-based and space-borne instrumentation and laboratory simulation of solar system processes are included. The following fields of planetary and solar system research are covered:
• Celestial mechanics, including dynamical evolution of the solar system, gravitational captures and resonances, relativistic effects, tracking and dynamics
• Cosmochemistry and origin, including all aspects of the formation and initial physical and chemical evolution of the solar system
• Terrestrial planets and satellites, including the physics of the interiors, geology and morphology of the surfaces, tectonics, mineralogy and dating
• Outer planets and satellites, including formation and evolution, remote sensing at all wavelengths and in situ measurements
• Planetary atmospheres, including formation and evolution, circulation and meteorology, boundary layers, remote sensing and laboratory simulation
• Planetary magnetospheres and ionospheres, including origin of magnetic fields, magnetospheric plasma and radiation belts, and their interaction with the sun, the solar wind and satellites
• Small bodies, dust and rings, including asteroids, comets and zodiacal light and their interaction with the solar radiation and the solar wind
• Exobiology, including origin of life, detection of planetary ecosystems and pre-biological phenomena in the solar system and laboratory simulations
• Extrasolar systems, including the detection and/or the detectability of exoplanets and planetary systems, their formation and evolution, the physical and chemical properties of the exoplanets
• History of planetary and space research